Originally posted by: Tuvoc
I tried to set my memory at 1000 5-5-5-15 and got the dreaded long beep meaning a memory error. Of course then the BIOS defaulted back to 800, which is in the "hole" area and it wouldn't boot at all again until I removed 1 stick of memory. It then booted I set it at 711, put the 4th stick back in, and all is well. That's the trouble with the 4 x 1GB memory hole, when you're experimenting it is a total pain to have to remove and refit the 4th stick when you hit a problem. I guess 5-5-5-18 or a little more viltage may have helped.
Anyway - running at 853 at the moment. When I increase memory speed I see a *tiny* increase in Sandra bandwidth, like 1-2%. Must be the board doing something with the sub-timings ? My numbers in outright terms are quite low - 4-4-4-12 2T at 711 was 5445 and at 853 is 5571. So a 20% increase in memory speed led to a 2% increase in bandwidth. And of course this is why my real applications see no benefit from the 2%.... I may as well go back to 711 and remain in spec. Could be this behaviour is specific to the quad cores
That's how I feel about overclocking the memory. You need it ONLY to accomodate the increased data bandwidth due to overclocking the processor. Otherwise, the risk of instability is too great, considering relatively minimal gains in performance.
I think you should leave it at 853 though, that should give it a sufficient throughput for your potential future overclock.