I'm not voting because I don't like the options, mostly because they don't address any of the real issues with the respective industries.
Wrt music, saying it's wrong under any circumstances is like saying that the current state of the products is acceptable. As far as I've thought about it, the product was fine before the internet became a major player in the ability to pirate. Piracy happened but not on a scale that anyone really cared about because it wasn't practical. Similarly, now that it is practical, it would be nice if everyone just felt wrong about it and didn't do it. Then the industry could continue to sell straight-up, standardized products in an open market. Of course, that's not the case and there's no sense in pretending it is (like the riaa does when they try to litigate their way through it).
Obviously something needs to change. The media industries seem to think that something is drm. Opinions on that are pretty clear: it does more harm to the honest customer than the pirate by putting up easy-to-bypass security hassles, harming cross-compatiblity of technologies and even passing the cost of development of such stupid technologies on to the paying customer. That's only going to drive piracy up. Obviously a new model for the industry is needed although I can't say I know what that is. Online music stores are an interesting concept but they offer reduced quality products with artificial limitations (songs that can only be played by a limited number of programs/devices) so I can't see that really helping anything. Personally, I almost wish that the entire media industry would collapse tomorrow. Music and theatre certainly benefit from money but they aren't motivated or inspired by it so the music industry's claims that we'd lose all that music we love so much is pure crap. There'd be a period where sharing music would certainly be less convenient but humans will never stop producing it.
My personal take on music is that I try not to pirate, just because I'd prefer not to resort to something that is technically illegal. I do copy cds from friends here and there, but mostly with the intention of buying them myself eventually if I really like them. I buy cds, generally without too much concern for drm as it hasn't given me much trouble, but I think I would avoid Sony on principle and write the artist to tell them why I didn't buy their music. I generally only deal with the cd long enough to rip it once anyways.
My take on the software industry is largely the same. Selling off-the-shelf proprietary software has just become too icky with respect to stopping pirates while giving paying customers minimal hassle. Luckily there is a business model I think is better, namely open source software. So I try to avoid the whole piracy vs. paying thing by simply using an alternative. It doesn't have all the answers yet, but I'm happy enough so far. I also use os x on my powerbook which would seem like a bit of a contradiction but I haven't noticed too many piracy issues surrounding os x yet and I don't use any non-open 3rd party software. I'm not overly attached to it so if apple does something to annoy me enough (which I'm sure they will eventually do) I'll just not buy another one.
Now if you're asking whether it's morally acceptable or not, I'd still so no, as it is against the law, and I don't wanna hear the "damn the man" arguments either 
Facebook
Twitter