That would not be seeing the whole picture. Would you rather pay $10/gal and have a one minute wait or would you rather pay the normal price and wait 10 hours?I can not fathom a single reason you could legitimately side with a business that is taking advantage of people in need for their own benefit and profit.
That would not be seeing the whole picture. Would you rather pay $10/gal and have a one minute wait or would you rather pay the normal price and wait 10 hours?
Are you sure the gas he was selling was already in his storage tanks or had already purchased gas at a higher price from a local distributor?
So implement rationing, and if this increases your costs (i.e. having smaller transactions), then increase price slightly to compensate.That would not be seeing the whole picture. Would you rather pay $10/gal and have a one minute wait or would you rather pay the normal price and wait 10 hours?
Depending upon your car, how you drive and other factors, a full tank of gas can go a long way.
Also, don't forget that the State of NJ gets revenue from gas sales without full consent of the people paying it while those who were "gouged" had other options or at least weren't forced to pay something they may not have wanted to under threat of violence being committed against them.
Anyway, the aforementioned is still just part of the whole.
I had a sliver of hope coming in here you might side with nj here, but of course that was a very long shot. I can not fathom a single reason you could legitimately side with a business that is taking advantage of people in need for their own benefit and profit.
Here's a few reasons:
1. The ability to charge premium prices during power outages encourages gas station owners to invest in backup generators for future events.
2. The high prices would reduce lines and wait times for those you do get gas.
3. In times when gas is scare, it is reasonable to allocate the gas by willingness to pay.
4. Restrictions on gas stations charging a fair market price created a black market for gas in the tri-state area. This has many negative consequences for public safety.
5. Higher prices would have encouraged truckers and oil companies to bring more gas into the area from further away
If you have a problem take it up with Chris Christie.
If you have a problem take it up with Chris Christie.
Christie is bound to enforce whatever laws are on the books.
But I haven't heard him say anything about it.
He does seem to have made himself the chief of the recovery. He seems to be doing a good job of it, btw.
New Jersey has filed lawsuits against eight businesses for allegedly gouging customers with exorbitant prices in the days after Superstorm Sandy roared ashore, the state's attorney general said Friday.
Link
Is this just? It's not in my opinion, because of supply and demand issues. $5.50 was kind of generous considering the facts.
If the owners costs have increased, the owner is allowed to increase his prices to compensate.Are you sure the gas he was selling was already in his storage tanks or had already purchased gas at a higher price from a local distributor?
I disagree that it reduces supply, unless you suspect that people would horde the gasoline if sold at pre-storm prices? Supply had already been decreased through stations being closed. Demand exceeded supply. People are simply going to buy it until it's gone.Yes, it's supply and demand. And it's also gouging.
I have a problem with gouging laws in that they reduce the supply of important commodities when they are needed.
Since when is the free market illegal?
Another example of the government putting the clamps on small businesses. Fuck you Obama, as a small business owner, I can jack up my prices whenever I want, I don't need the government telling me how to run my business.