Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
- May 14, 2012
- 6,762
- 1
- 0
*If* and it's a big *if* we pretend that you have established that higher prices would have lead to increased supply, sooner (how much sooner? An hour?), you still haven't proven that this is a 'best outcome'.
"Best outcome" is a subjective assessment. My claim was that allowing prices to float increases supply -- and it does.
Not everyone will consider this a "best outcome". But many will, including those who actually need the items in short supply the most.
You claimed to have objections to that principle, but haven't outlined what they are. So, no, so far it is not a "big if". It's well-established market behavior.
Your assumptions of voluntary behavior, and others your model requires are certainly in doubt in crisis situations.
Sorry, I don't know what you are talking about here.
Again, if you want to make an argument that price controls do not increase supply during shortages, please do so. You haven't yet.