• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The second Steele memo

I'm not believing any of it 'til I see Hannity and Limbaugh mention their support for it on their shows. I mean, there's a trust issue involved here and Hannity and Limbaugh are the ONLY guys a person can trust now days. /S

Don't mind me, I just wanted to see what it felt like to be a Trump chump. Turns out I was laughing my ass off as I was tapping out that sarcy script because it felt like my brain started to shut down and the room was getting darker every time I hit a key and then I started seeing ISIS terrorists in every corner of the room and Obama swinging out of a tree coming right at me. lol
 
"Do as I say, or I will nuke Mar-a-Lago".

_100239698_floridatarget.jpg
 
Steele's sources are Putin and Clinton. And you gleefully use them to assault the USA / a political opponent.
What? Space Aliens? Who?

If THAT is your take away from this story I dont know man... lost in space, lost in space.. Steele is the attack, the assault, on the USA? Ok dude... have fun with those gay frogs.
 
What? Space Aliens? Who?

He has repeatedly argued that since Steele used sources within the Russian government that somehow indicates that STEELE (and therefore the Democrats who hired him) were colluding with the Russian government/Putin.

I have never been able to determine how this argument makes even the slightest shred of sense. That's like saying if we got James Comey's notes on his meetings with Trump then our source was Trump and therefore can't be trusted.
 
He has repeatedly argued that since Steele used sources within the Russian government that somehow indicates that STEELE (and therefore the Democrats who hired him) were colluding with the Russian government/Putin.

I have never been able to determine how this argument makes even the slightest shred of sense. That's like saying if we got James Comey's notes on his meetings with Trump then our source was Trump and therefore can't be trusted.
Yea Ive seen that argument being tossed around.. it is insane... it is like that Trump vs Clinton debate "no you are the puppet, you are the puppet"... just take whatever argument your opponent is throwing at you and flip it 180.. "No YOU are the white supremacist".. "dude I am black" .. "BENGHAZI!"
 
He was used because he was already an expert on Russia from his spy days. Had established contacts.
This is what everyone knows, except of course conservatives and Republicans holding their hands over their ears and yelling la la la la.........
 
Yea Ive seen that argument being tossed around.. it is insane... it is like that Trump vs Clinton debate "no you are the puppet, you are the puppet"... just take whatever argument your opponent is throwing at you and flip it 180.. "No YOU are the white supremacist".. "dude I am black" .. "BENGHAZI!"

I'm still trying to figure out how anyone would be expected to compile intelligence on the actions of the Russian government without using sources in the Russian government. Maybe people on a tour of the Kremlin who got lost and wandered into a top secret intelligence briefing? (good thing that tourist speaks Russian!)
 
He has repeatedly argued that since Steele used sources within the Russian government that somehow indicates that STEELE (and therefore the Democrats who hired him) were colluding with the Russian government/Putin.

I have never been able to determine how this argument makes even the slightest shred of sense. That's like saying if we got James Comey's notes on his meetings with Trump then our source was Trump and therefore can't be trusted.
I guess it makes the Dems useful idiots of Russia then?
 
He has repeatedly argued that since Steele used sources within the Russian government that somehow indicates that STEELE (and therefore the Democrats who hired him) were colluding with the Russian government/Putin.

I have never been able to determine how this argument makes even the slightest shred of sense. That's like saying if we got James Comey's notes on his meetings with Trump then our source was Trump and therefore can't be trusted.
Steele was supposed to use the Acme Objective Bothsides spy agency.
 
Back
Top