Wow, liberal trifecta!
I seem to recall that if you had a preexisting condition you couldn't get health insurance, or if you went past your cap on your child it was time for it to die, or you couldn't get any insurance for a sick child to begin with. Do you remember stuff like that?
Yes, I remember that. In fact, I believe those things are still true until 2014. But you have a point, there are good things about ObamaCare.
The states were handling health care prior to the recent law?
Yes, health care (or rather, the health care insurance that pays for health care for most of us) was handled by the states prior to this bill. Medicare/Medicaid was administered by the states and presumably still will be, though subject to federal oversight.
You must mean the changes invoked by our democratically elected representatives, modified and nearly blocked by an over represented minority in the Senate?
If we, the people, enjoyed truly proportional representation in that body, we'd have a much better result.
An overly represented minority? Either you believe in our system of democratically elected representatives, or you don't. Since all members of Congress* are elected by popular vote, by definition they are proportionally representing the populace. If you wish a parliamentarian system, there are a number of choices for your moving pleasure.
*The Senate that passed ObamaCare did include a record number of Senators who were appointed rather than elected - seven initially, six in the final vote. All those were Democrats. If your position is that Democrats were unfairly represented then I suppose you have a ghost of a point, but if memory serves all those replaced Democrats. Since both parties voted in lockstep in the Senate, this apparently would make no difference. In the House of course, opposition was bipartisan, whereas support was still partisan.