The role of meat and fire in human evolution.

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,436
1,569
126
Now reading up on human evolution it seems that meat eating started the process of of our oldest ancestors becoming human, but the learning how to control fire and especially using to it cook food is what lead them down that path towards us.

Cooking not only made meat safer to eat, but also rendered otherwise toxic plants into food sources that made available a larger range and increasing survival rates.

Anyone have any thought about this? I'll post links once I find them again.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,611
30,887
146
It's generally considered the food that fed our cerebellum as that part of our brain grew larger and larger to further define us as modern humans. For millions of years, there was no other source of protein and iron that could feed that need. Good old red meat.

We certainly evolved to eat meat, and cooking and food processing was an essential, non-replaceable tool that allowed that to happen.

"Raw diet" morons can go eff themselves. /side rant

What I always wondered...how many forests were burned to the ground as idiot humans were first starting to figure that out? :D
 

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,436
1,569
126
It's generally considered the food that fed our cerebellum as that part of our brain grew larger and larger to further define us as modern humans. For millions of years, there was no other source of protein and iron that could feed that need. Good old red meat.

We certainly evolved to eat meat, and cooking and food processing was an essential, non-replaceable tool that allowed that to happen.

"Raw diet" morons can go eff themselves. /side rant

What I always wondered...how many forests were burned to the ground as idiot humans were first starting to figure that out? :D
Yeah as far I know folks eating a raw diet don't thrive well on it. Plus meat eating also provides a good amount of B12 and Zinc as well.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
[QUOTE="zinfamous, post: 39423458, member: 198296


What I always wondered...how many forests were burned to the ground as idiot humans were first starting to figure that out? :D[/QUOTE]
Not as many as were purposely set on fire.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,611
30,887
146
Not as many as were purposely set on fire.

That's a good point--it would be a devastating technology employed against rival tribes and groups. However, for much of those early periods, Human were still highly nomadic, relatively small groups that didn't have much need for forests. The first civilizations probably began popping up in desert areas (well if we ignore what was going on in Mesoamerica, probably at the same time--then again, those folks cleared out epic hectares of forest land).

...but that makes me curious. One wonders if that could be a contributing factor to keeping human tribes nomadic for generations and generations longer than they otherwise would have been, further delaying technology and progress that would have happened earlier with organized cities. It doesn't make much sense to settle if you are constantly being burned out of your land. Then you start finding folks gathering in fertile plains and desert regions, where weaponized fire isn't going to have that kind of an impact.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
98,973
17,389
126
It's generally considered the food that fed our cerebellum as that part of our brain grew larger and larger to further define us as modern humans. For millions of years, there was no other source of protein and iron that could feed that need. Good old red meat.

We certainly evolved to eat meat, and cooking and food processing was an essential, non-replaceable tool that allowed that to happen.

"Raw diet" morons can go eff themselves. /side rant

What I always wondered...how many forests were burned to the ground as idiot humans were first starting to figure that out? :D


I think they found vha
That's a good point--it would be a devastating technology employed against rival tribes and groups. However, for much of those early periods, Human were still highly nomadic, relatively small groups that didn't have much need for forests. The first civilizations probably began popping up in desert areas (well if we ignore what was going on in Mesoamerica, probably at the same time--then again, those folks cleared out epic hectares of forest land).

...but that makes me curious. One wonders if that could be a contributing factor to keeping human tribes nomadic for generations and generations longer than they otherwise would have been, further delaying technology and progress that would have happened earlier with organized cities. It doesn't make much sense to settle if you are constantly being burned out of your land. Then you start finding folks gathering in fertile plains and desert regions, where weaponized fire isn't going to have that kind of an impact.


Food is migratory, you follow the food.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
That's a good point--it would be a devastating technology employed against rival tribes and groups. However, for much of those early periods, Human were still highly nomadic, relatively small groups that didn't have much need for forests. The first civilizations probably began popping up in desert areas (well if we ignore what was going on in Mesoamerica, probably at the same time--then again, those folks cleared out epic hectares of forest land).

...but that makes me curious. One wonders if that could be a contributing factor to keeping human tribes nomadic for generations and generations longer than they otherwise would have been, further delaying technology and progress that would have happened earlier with organized cities. It doesn't make much sense to settle if you are constantly being burned out of your land. Then you start finding folks gathering in fertile plains and desert regions, where weaponized fire isn't going to have that kind of an impact.
Forests occur mainly in temperate zones which are far more conducive to civilization. It's all too common to think our ancestors weren't as intelligent as modern man but, the key to survival and the cornerstone of science is observation.
 

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,436
1,569
126
Forests occur mainly in temperate zones which are far more conducive to civilization. It's all too common to think our ancestors weren't as intelligent as modern man but, the key to survival and the cornerstone of science is observation.
I wonder if modern civilization tends to allow a large amount of the stupid to survive and reproduce who otherwise would have been killed off early on by their stupidity?
 

dasherHampton

Platinum Member
Jan 19, 2018
2,592
517
126
Ancient humanoids came across animals that had died in a fire, tried the roasted meat, and immediately made controlling fire the #1 scientific priority of all time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whm1974

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
69,818
13,393
126
www.anyf.ca
Blood type can also play a role in the diet you should follow, though it's probably more of a guide line than a rule. I'm type A negative so technically I should avoid most meat. I don't avoid meat completely but I happen to not eat it a lot. Not really because I try to follow this diet, just so happens that I don't eat a lot of it.

https://www.livestrong.com/article/291595-diet-for-a-negative-blood/

I'm not sold on the whole grains part though, there's lot of studies now saying that grain based diet is actually really bad for you. Then again there's lot of studies saying it's good too, can't really take any of this stuff to heart because nobody, even scientists, have it figured out. Everything in moderation is probably the only thing you can really go by.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
I wonder if modern civilization tends to allow a large amount of the stupid to survive and reproduce who otherwise would have been killed off early on by their stupidity?

Absolutely. There were no warning labels on the sabertooth tigers saying "warning, may eat you before you eat it".

The real question to ponder is did stupidity get more people killed during those early days when there was virtually no society to help or after the invention of alcohol?
 

whm1974

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2016
9,436
1,569
126
Blood type can also play a role in the diet you should follow, though it's probably more of a guide line than a rule. I'm type A negative so technically I should avoid most meat. I don't avoid meat completely but I happen to not eat it a lot. Not really because I try to follow this diet, just so happens that I don't eat a lot of it.

https://www.livestrong.com/article/291595-diet-for-a-negative-blood/
The blood type diet is a bunch of nonsense started in Japan. What in Hell does your blood type have to do what foods you should or shouldn't eat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eikelbijtertje

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
I wonder if modern civilization tends to allow a large amount of the stupid to survive and reproduce who otherwise would have been killed off early on by their stupidity?
Very much so. That's why I don't begrudge many "celebrities" their money. They'd literally die without it.
 

Denly

Golden Member
May 14, 2011
1,435
229
106
I wonder if modern civilization tends to allow a large amount of the stupid to survive and reproduce who otherwise would have been killed off early on by their stupidity?

Yes, it open up a whole can of worm since we bet natural selection and go in to god mode. With the adv in medical science, our population will continue to grow until the dead end(see agent Smith) unless we able to break from earth.