MongGrel
Lifer
- Dec 3, 2013
- 38,466
- 3,067
- 121
Sure there are some that did it for that, but many did it because it was either that or go bankrupt.
Bullshit.
Sure there are some that did it for that, but many did it because it was either that or go bankrupt.
You appear to be young and ignorant.LOL you on the left are so warped. Republicans are to blame? Democrats were charge of government for how long now? When is your side going to take responsibility?
this is the current warped view of the world the left has.
If republicans have a majority of government, they are responsible for everything bad
If republicans have a minority of government, they are responsible for everything bad
:awe:Man that isn't fair, NOBODY rails on the rich shipping overseas more than myself. Check my posting history. Why does McOwned get all the credit for attacking the rich? When do I get my props?
Because I wasn't born yesterday. Roofing houses isn't a shit job. It's not a legit job for "guest workers", to give some dipshit's little roofting company an out for having to pay decent wages and turn another profession into shit. Man, imagine if every company starts using that excuse how quickly we can get to third-world status. (Don't worry, we're actually well on the way to that.)A lot of assumption. How do you assume illegal?
True.
Sounds like you need to find another line of work. One problem is, a lot of dumbasses never learn to do much, never develop any interests that they can turn into fullfilling occupations, and so they drift lifelessly into some dull, paper-pushing bullshit like it sounds like you're mired in. Then they get all cynical and mad at everything and everyone and just become dicks. In worst case scenarios, they end up doing nothing much but bitching about "da man" and "outsercing err jerbs!" and claiming no one else is ever doing any work or anything valid... ie burnout dick ravings.
Probably too late for you, but if possible find something you enjoy doing instead of slaving away shuffling other people's paper around, and make that pay. Eventually your outlook won't be so bleak. Maybe you'll even opt out of the ongoing National Pity Party and start laughing a bit at those a little too caught up wallowing in it. Maybe.
HAHA nice edit. Was that just a bit too much burnout dick-raving before?
Anyway... look, I don't actually give a shit what you do, so no need for you to over-justify anything proving to yourself you actually love pushing paper around. I just pointed out your answer to DSF was needlessly dickish, because his reason was perfectly valid- dick ravings of you being the only one that knows anything about finance aside.
Because I wasn't born yesterday. Roofing houses isn't a shit job. It's not a legit job for "guest workers", to give some dipshit's little roofting company an out for having to pay decent wages and turn another profession into shit. Man, imagine if every company starts using that excuse how quickly we can get to third-world status. (Don't worry, we're actually well on the way to that.)
It's simply another thing that's been turned into a shit job, because of people like the asshole in your example, aided and abetted by corrupt government, and "rockstar" citizens who think they're too good to do anything anymore. (And HIGHLY IRONICALLY whine about no one doing any actual hard work- it's almost laughable!)
McDonalds is your go-to comparison?!You're still guessing and assuming. When I visit McDonalds and it's 100% Mexican are they all illegal too? Thats a Fortune 500. He had over 100 employees and 4 crews. One crew was a union crew for prevailing wage & govt work. Hardly a shit little company with bad wages but keep assuming.
For asshole slave-labor racketeers like your friend, of course it isn't. Go have another beer and point the finger as someone else over it. "That guy! Over there! His fault! He has more money than me! Must be him!"And you missed my point entirely when you went off on your racial tangent. Success and wealth is it's not about hard work.
Riiiiight and you know more than Zacks, and and The Street (Buying back one's own stock is seen as a sign of confidence, a sign that you believe the stock is undervalued) and a pretty much ANY financial source that will of course list that as a possible reason for a stock buyback.Never said I knew everything about finance, just said I know more than you or DSF, otherwise you two wouldn't be spewing the same old shit.
Riiiiight and you know more than Zacks, and and The Street (Buying back one's own stock is seen as a sign of confidence, a sign that you believe the stock is undervalued) and a pretty much ANY financial source that will of course list that as a possible reason for a stock buyback.
You're clearly too burned out to know I'm not claiming that's the case one way or another (in fact, I've said before I don't like many of the bullshit reasons companies use to buy back stock) just that undervaluation IS a reason often cited. If you actually bothered to read anything (like the Zacks link, clearly you were being too much of a know-it-all dick to actually do so) other's aren't actually saying that's ALWAYS the reason either, and many have criticism of it.
Shuffling other people's paper around in your dead-end job while pretending you're the only one doing any work is just making you a bitter dickhead- that's why I say find something more worthwhile to do if it's not too late.
I grew up in it. It didn't start with the jobs being shipped overseas. Most people weren't on the edge of bankruptcy with the only thing keeping them afloat being the availability of cheaper imported crap. It started with cheap crap made overseas by foreign companies. It wasn't American companies closing shop here and opening there just to make crap and then sell it in America. The majority of that came later. I think Bober was right, you do have willful ignorance
How can you live being so wrong?
A CEO no longer runs a factory of a few hundred people. They run international corporations with tens of thousands of employees. The amount earned per employee from small business to international conglomerate isn't all that different, it's just a matter of scale. Companies are simply bigger now. Do you really think it's realistic that the CEO of a company with yearly revenues nearing half a trillion dollars would only make $500K/yr just because the janitor only makes $15k/yr?
If you want to talk about companies getting too big, that's an interesting discussion. But just talking about wealth disparity because a handful of people run extremely large companies is not productive.