The recession will be over sooner than you think.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
Would be amusing if this was what the Obama administration was thinking and so they were desperate to pass the stimulus and take credit for it.
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
snip......


You see, if the securitization trust just allows a judicial foreclosure, they recover only 40k. If they write down everything, they recover 55K+. Which scenario is "better"?

LK, the point is is that a loan modification such as being discussed by our gov't triggers the bankruptcy clause. BKs can affect all tranches equally so your AAA super nice tranche can potentially take a hit.... and those tranches are the super-senior debt. Something like a money market fund.

That's not scary?
 

JMapleton

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2008
4,179
2
81
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: JMapleton
Economists at Stanford believe it will be over soon.

Originally posted by: Skoorb
BTW the authors to this essay are an "assistant professor" and a "PhD Candidate".

:laugh:

That still carries more credibility than "Lifer."
:laugh:
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Was that guy calling the housing bubble back in 2005? No? Than his opinion isnt worth shit.

To be fair, another 12 to 18 months is probably a reasonable length to the recession. That would make this a 2-3 year recession which is very severe. Keeping in mind that when things start heading up next year, well still be significantly lower than we are even right now, itll be probably a good 3-4 years from now until we reach where we were in 2007.

 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Farang
Would be amusing if this was what the Obama administration was thinking and so they were desperate to pass the stimulus and take credit for it.

Given that only about 20% of the 800B is going to spent this year, it could very well be the case.
 

BigJelly

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Farang
Would be amusing if this was what the Obama administration was thinking and so they were desperate to pass the stimulus and take credit for it.

Given that only about 20% of the 800B is going to spent this year, it could very well be the case.

Given the stupidity of the american public and the bias of the press, he'll get away with it even if the recession gets worse when businesses realize that the "stimulus" will demand higher taxes from them soon.

I got an idea...I give the government $13 a week this year and $8 next year and they give me $9713 with interest.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Zebo
My Dad think this too he is buying up homes on auction block right now .... Contrarian investing is nothing new.


It's a great time to buy.

Indeed, sadly in a negative equity position on my current home means I cant partake in the buying :(

There's a reason why Buffet and many others are contrarian investors. There's a good reason why there's the saying of be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy, or when there's blood on the streets, buy. It's because people like GT Keeper can never see the mitigating factors of a downturn, or even an upturn. He's a "here and now" guy.

I hear you. Taking what money I have and plowing it into the stock market. If I cant get in on a house. I think there is good profit to be made by this low valued market. Sure I think it may fall some more through this year. But I have a feeling the worst will be over by the end of 09. Buy in at 7-8K and see it appreciate back to 11-13K in 2010-11.

Yeah maybe you guys are right but I think too many deadbeats in this country voting themselves stuff combined with BabyBoomers about to tap govt coffers makes for big long term issues. I'm a permanent bear. Not a grizzly though more like a teddy and will hedge.

When i used to work I had a 403b and that means I could never roll over to IRA of any kind - forced into a pick of about 10 funds, can't move until I hit about 50 something i think 59.... - and all 10 are shit like lost 2/3 of what was in there in 2001. Anyway - I recent;y moved all into a "growth" type fund hoping to catch the potential rebound - or crash and burn - I dont care anymore it's not much to talk about either way.
 

nullzero

Senior member
Jan 15, 2005
670
0
0
These analyst and optimistic people need to look at reality... Until they can actually show some concrete numbers on a recovery they should shut up. I am sick of hearing this line; "history shows that we usually rebound in X amount of months, and the U.S. is the most sound economy in the world" We are indeed in a big crap hole right now regarding this economy.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: nullzero
These analyst and optimistic people need to look at reality... Until they can actually show some concrete numbers on a recovery they should shut up. I am sick of hearing this line; "history shows that we usually rebound in X amount of months, and the U.S. is the most sound economy in the world" We are indeed in a big crap hole right now regarding this economy.

That's what I say because we have maxed our credit out collectively. No more will foreigners believe these flimflam US bankers selling securities rated AAA by flimflam US rating agencies. The party is over, has been over since the 90's, only by hook or crook were we able to extract more credit line from actual producers in the world,
 

CLite

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,726
7
76
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: nullzero
These analyst and optimistic people need to look at reality... Until they can actually show some concrete numbers on a recovery they should shut up. I am sick of hearing this line; "history shows that we usually rebound in X amount of months, and the U.S. is the most sound economy in the world" We are indeed in a big crap hole right now regarding this economy.

That's what I say because we have maxed our credit out collectively. No more will foreigners believe these flimflam US bankers selling securities rated AAA by flimflam US rating agencies. The party is over, has been over since the 90's, only by hook or crook were we able to extract more credit line from actual producers in the world,

Hold.The.Phone.

Please look at U.S. Treasury's they are in huge demand,look to their yield. Currently Wallstreet's ineptitude and the whole securities debacle has not phased the Treasury market at all, infact it has strengthened it due to the overall global crunch.

*edit: by Treasury's I obviously mean notes
 

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
Originally posted by: JMapleton
Originally posted by: GTKeeper

Based on your research here, I am assuming you are doubling down on the market right now? Buy some equitites, go ahead, see where you are at at the end of the year.

Warren Buffett wrote an article in our newspaper about 4 months ago saying he was 100% in stocks because it was such a great time to buy. I think that speaks for itself.
Warren Buffet can afford to lose more money than practically any one person or even some countries.
To bet the way he does is a sucker's play.
What he does is not relevant to me and my situation.

 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: JMapleton
Originally posted by: GTKeeper

Based on your research here, I am assuming you are doubling down on the market right now? Buy some equitites, go ahead, see where you are at at the end of the year.

Warren Buffett wrote an article in our newspaper about 4 months ago saying he was 100% in stocks because it was such a great time to buy. I think that speaks for itself.
Warren Buffet can afford to lose more money than practically any one person or even some countries.
To bet the way he does is a sucker's play.
What he does is not relevant to me and my situation.

Buffet is responsible for millions of people's well being and knows his words have major impact on world economies. He has the track record of a responsible guy, as good as anyone else's, so his words mean something. And, frankly, his record speaks for itself.
 

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: JMapleton
Originally posted by: GTKeeper

Based on your research here, I am assuming you are doubling down on the market right now? Buy some equitites, go ahead, see where you are at at the end of the year.

Warren Buffett wrote an article in our newspaper about 4 months ago saying he was 100% in stocks because it was such a great time to buy. I think that speaks for itself.
Warren Buffet can afford to lose more money than practically any one person or even some countries.
To bet the way he does is a sucker's play.
What he does is not relevant to me and my situation.

Buffet is responsible for millions of people's well being and knows his words have major impact on world economies. He has the track record of a responsible guy, as good as anyone else's, so his words mean something. And, frankly, his record speaks for itself.
Well, WB can buy and sell us all, so what's your point? Everyone thought Bernie Madeoff was a mensch, too.
He (WB & BM) still has discretionary income. I do not.
He (WB) is in "Investment" mode. I am in "Survival".

Apparently it IS a Zero Sum Game. If you have a ZERO sum, you can't play the game!

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Can't believe you compare Buffet to MadeOFF.

Anyway I disagree with the premise some of you have that Buffet investing in stocks means it will go up in the short term since he takes long term view of things. Could be 5 years for or 1 we don't know his feelings on this.
 

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Can't believe you compare Buffet to MadeOFF.

Anyway I disagree with the premise some of you have that Buffet investing in stocks means it will go up in the short term since he takes long term view of things. Could be 5 years for or 1 we don't know his feelings on this.
I didn't compare him, I associated him.
You are comparing them.
Please know the difference.


As for Warren Buffet, I believe he could be the bait in The Bear Trap.

All good cons need a "big name" to lure as many marks in for the last play. Once they believe "the big guy" is "all in" the marks go in, hoping to ride the wave.
Only thing is the marks don't have the ability to re-fill after "an unexpected dip" occurs and wipes everyone out. Everyone except the "big guy".
It's never a Zero-Sum Game until you're wiped out.

 

gingermeggs

Golden Member
Dec 22, 2008
1,157
0
71
economists are in mathematics the equivalent of shrinks to neuro-surgeons.
Their science is foundless like witchkraft!
They talk it up so they can suck a buck or two from it, they are like mudskippers in the everglades, spewing shit and sucking scum. Its good to see this whole thing and the grubs which feed of it all burn!
I reckon this is great stuff to watch, as all these wanna be rich types, who only 6months ago, drove round in beamers wearing gucci and wayfarers, now sit in queues for food stamps, hell it makes me wanna wet my pants seein' this crap! please let it last for years as I like to see the Y-gen get fucked over too, because they are whinny cock suckers like their babyboomer folks!
This is just free karma shitcakes for capitalists!
My tip is get into funeral palours or anti-depressant medication supply, big future in these sectors.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
snip......


You see, if the securitization trust just allows a judicial foreclosure, they recover only 40k. If they write down everything, they recover 55K+. Which scenario is "better"?

LK, the point is is that a loan modification such as being discussed by our gov't triggers the bankruptcy clause. BKs can affect all tranches equally so your AAA super nice tranche can potentially take a hit.... and those tranches are the super-senior debt. Something like a money market fund.

That's not scary?

I'm not much of a RMBS guy (never did the term deal side of those, only warehousing) and even the other guy I know here who did RMBS term had never seen this type of structure (he usually did prime non-conforming).

Yeah, after reading through the PPM and tracing the definitions, it's pretty apparent that "excess losses" above the special reserves (BK, fraud...etc) are allocated to all bondholders.

This is a valid point, to a certain extent. The government is already considering purchasing the bonds and then modifying the loans. To the extent that the Servicer wants to seek an amendment to alter this situation they'd most likely need 100% of noteholder consent, as is usually the case for any alterations of prin balance or significant note attributes.

This is a problem but one that can be circumvented.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Was that guy calling the housing bubble back in 2005? No? Than his opinion isnt worth shit.

To be fair, another 12 to 18 months is probably a reasonable length to the recession. That would make this a 2-3 year recession which is very severe. Keeping in mind that when things start heading up next year, well still be significantly lower than we are even right now, itll be probably a good 3-4 years from now until we reach where we were in 2007.
I'd actually like to jump on board your train. Which is to say that with a recession being defined as contraction, the further shrinking of the economy may very well end this year, but from a more practical perspective, which I think is return to where the economy was, clearly that will not happen this year; i.e. the ground lost to date and ground that will continue to lose going forward is certainly not going to be recovered this year.

 

extra

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,947
7
81
Originally posted by: JMapleton
Originally posted by: Skoorb
That's it? He bases this all on some fear index. Like that's basically all of it. Not convinced, however he has a promising career working for the Federal Reserve with attitudes like his.

I understand it's the "cool thing" to be a pessimist and claim you know "what really goes on."

However, if such an index has been correct in all previous recessions, why should it be different?

On the outside, a fear index may seem to be not very telling of the where the economy truly is. But the point made in the article is that companies fear uncertainty and freeze hiring when no end of a recession is in sight, thus prolonging recessions.

It should not be long until the dwindling of uncertainty becomes noticeable and companies begin to hire again, which would create a ripple effect that will end the recession. I give it until next holiday season when holiday sales rebound and consumer confidence rebounds and creates a clear message to companies that it's safe to hire again.

BTW the authors to this essay are an "assistant professor" and a "PhD Candidate".

I would guess that more credibility than you have or almost everyone else on anandtech.

I see a lot of posts like this. You know, I really hope you are right. Part of me looks around and says that you are...

Unfortunately it also seems to me like many experts and hell, leaders in our society, have been so dead wrong, makes it hard to have much faith.