The rape of America.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: taltamir
it was democrats who deregulated housing causing its bubble... and opposed republicans who tried to regulate it. Democrats =! regulation.
How did deregulation cause a housing bubble?
Were previous housing bubbles caused by deregulations?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: SSSnail
60 Minutes segment on oil and speculations.

I just can't imagine the day we'll have governmental oversight over commodities (again). Free market? Yeah, right...

Edit: Oh, and you "supply and demand" guys? Go douse yourselves in oil and smoke a cigarette.

Well why on earth did the speculators allow oil to go all the way down $40 a barrel. Did they get tired of raping us?

The reality is there was speculation in the oil market, but they were only able to drive prices up because supply was so tight. Prices went up, more supply came online, demand dropped and prices plummeted. It really is that simple.

They had to stop because the massive redemptions in the hedge fund industry, not to mention they just couldn't keep the scheme going in light of the failing economy.

As with the housing scheme, once the music stopped, they knew they would be left without a chair, so they all left the market.

Now there are many without a chair, so they're storing oil in massive tankers, praying it'll go up enough so they don't lose all of their money.

It was all a big fucking joke.

As evidenced by this...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...R2008082003898_pf.html

Yes the bubble was formed and popped for many reasons.

Not "many" reasons. As shown in the link, ONE speculator held 11% of the contracts trading in the market. They weren't holding them for delivery, but for speculation. Creating that much demand, out of thin air, WILL drive prices up.

Yes it will. But that one speculator was only able to do that because supply was tight and could keep turning over the contract without having the take delivery. Once supply and demand came back into equalibrium, flipping the contracts was no longer an option so they money left that market.

Jesus fucking christ, do you not fucking get it?

Demand was equiv to supply for years. If it was truly supply/demand, you'd have seen some people NOT get enough oil, simply because higher paying people would TAKE the oil from them by out-bidding them. I never once saw a story about oil shortages. The market was adequately supplied and was continued to be adequately supplied. There was not one fucking "fundamental" that changed between 2006 and 2008 that lead to a 600% price appreciation.

The only thing that changed was a paper investment of more than $800bn that fled from the debt/mortgage market to the commodities market.

It's why EVERY commodity shot up, not just oil. It's why EVERY commodity (except for gold) has come crashing down. Everybody plowed into commodities, then when the redemptions hit, everybody came out.

I'd buy your bullshit argument if the supply side was limited to oil, and the crash in demand of oil caused a crash in price, resulting in an over-supply.

Even now, with them trying to prop up the price through supply cuts they can't keep up. That's because it had NOTHING to do with supply/demand.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: taltamir
it was democrats who deregulated housing causing its bubble... and opposed republicans who tried to regulate it. Democrats =! regulation.
How did deregulation cause a housing bubble?
Were previous housing bubbles caused by deregulations?

Previous housing bubbles were caused by local market perturbations, not through lack of regulation. It's why I laughed my ass off when people kept saying this housing burst would still be local. They fail to understand that securitization has turned housing from a local investment to an international investment.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: SSSnail
60 Minutes segment on oil and speculations.

I just can't imagine the day we'll have governmental oversight over commodities (again). Free market? Yeah, right...

Edit: Oh, and you "supply and demand" guys? Go douse yourselves in oil and smoke a cigarette.

Well why on earth did the speculators allow oil to go all the way down $40 a barrel. Did they get tired of raping us?

The reality is there was speculation in the oil market, but they were only able to drive prices up because supply was so tight. Prices went up, more supply came online, demand dropped and prices plummeted. It really is that simple.

Fighting for a supply/demand excuse for oil prices all the way to the end, eh? Somehow, I think a mountain of evidence could fall on you, and you'd still continue to spew on and on about it.

That's because he's ignorant. I've trounced him all over here and he still comes back to the same lame-ass argument.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
[

Jesus fucking christ, do you not fucking get it?

Demand was equiv to supply for years. If it was truly supply/demand, you'd have seen some people NOT get enough oil, simply because higher paying people would TAKE the oil from them by out-bidding them. I never once saw a story about oil shortages. The market was adequately supplied and was continued to be adequately supplied. There was not one fucking "fundamental" that changed between 2006 and 2008 that lead to a 600% price appreciation.


Higher prices keep shortages from happening. Industry found ways to do the same job with less. I could give you countless examples of how industry changed so they could use less. I can also give you countless examples of how supply rose.


The only thing that changed was a paper investment of more than $800bn that fled from the debt/mortgage market to the commodities market.
Yes and they fled because they were going to have to start taking delivery rather than flipping contracts.

It's why EVERY commodity shot up, not just oil. It's why EVERY commodity (except for gold) has come crashing down. Everybody plowed into commodities, then when the redemptions hit, everybody came out.

Oil like most other commodities are heavily used for industrial production. By the time the oil bubble popped, several of the world economies were already in recession, so industrial production was falling. Which means demand for those commodities were falling as well.
I'd buy your bullshit argument if the supply side was limited to oil, and the crash in demand of oil caused a crash in price, resulting in an over-supply.

Even now, with them trying to prop up the price through supply cuts they can't keep up. That's because it had NOTHING to do with supply/demand.


And then demand dropped because of global recession and that has pushed demand quite low.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: SSSnail
60 Minutes segment on oil and speculations.

I just can't imagine the day we'll have governmental oversight over commodities (again). Free market? Yeah, right...

Edit: Oh, and you "supply and demand" guys? Go douse yourselves in oil and smoke a cigarette.

Well why on earth did the speculators allow oil to go all the way down $40 a barrel. Did they get tired of raping us?

The reality is there was speculation in the oil market, but they were only able to drive prices up because supply was so tight. Prices went up, more supply came online, demand dropped and prices plummeted. It really is that simple.

Fighting for a supply/demand excuse for oil prices all the way to the end, eh? Somehow, I think a mountain of evidence could fall on you, and you'd still continue to spew on and on about it.

That's because he's ignorant. I've trounced him all over here and he still comes back to the same lame-ass argument.

You have not trounced me, I am just at a bigger picture than you are. I do realize hedge funds played a role. I have not denied that. But you at least need to admit that tight supply is what allowed the hedge funds to drive up the price.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: taltamir
Originally posted by: frostedflakes
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Yea I saw that. No new real info for me. I kept up with some of the info and saw the majority of oil futures went to people that never took delivery of it. All the demand we kept hearing about was never really there. In fact after prices went up a little demand started to drop. and so on...

The problem is as soon as more money gets back into the market oil will jump again. That and the middle east is cutting back a little as well. So unless soemthing is done then gas can get higher then it was before. I am kinda glad Obama and Dems have more power now and hopefully they have not been paid off like the republicans were for oil/broker houses.
With a stronger Democratic majority in Congress, we may actually be able to get some legislation pushed through to help curb rampant speculation. There were some bills being pushed through during the summer, but they got held up by the Republicans.

it was democrats who deregulated housing causing its bubble... and opposed republicans who tried to regulate it. Democrats =! regulation.

BS
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

Eventually Bubbles burst. Speculators started seeing the writing on the wall and realized that they'd be unable to keep Selling what they were Buying. Last one out ends up Losing everything, don't be that Schmuck.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

Eventually Bubbles burst. Speculators started seeing the writing on the wall and realized that they'd be unable to keep Selling what they were Buying. Last one out ends up Losing everything, don't be that Schmuck.

Your right, demand dropped, supply came up and the game was over.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

Eventually Bubbles burst. Speculators started seeing the writing on the wall and realized that they'd be unable to keep Selling what they were Buying. Last one out ends up Losing everything, don't be that Schmuck.

Your right, demand dropped, supply came up and the game was over.

Demand has dropped from where it was. The problem was that Demand was never more than Supply. Supply didn't "come up", Demand just dropped further under Supply.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

Uh, no. The gig was up, the smart ones got out, Price collapsed.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

No, because every speculative bubble eventually pops.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Speculated Supply =| Real Supply

These criminals helped crush the whole worlds economy. I sure hope we find a way to charge them with something..WHAT next.. some essential foods and medicines?
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: dahunan
Speculated Supply =| Real Supply

These criminals helped crush the whole worlds economy. I sure hope we find a way to charge them with something..WHAT next.. some essential foods and medicines?

The global economy was going down anyway. This just accelerated the downturn.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

No, because every speculative bubble eventually pops.

And they pop because prices get to high, which forces those consumers to do something else.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

No, because every speculative bubble eventually pops.

And they pop because prices get to high, which forces those consumers to do something else.

Not in this case.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

No, because every speculative bubble eventually pops.

And they pop because prices get to high, which forces those consumers to do something else.

Not in this case.

So you deny that both consumers and industry alike changed how they used oil, so they could use less of it? You deny that rig count went to high not seen in 30 years?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You're wrong Charrison, just admit it. Every single person on the planet recognizes that speculation, NOT supply/demand drove the price of oil. Except for you. You're the lone hold-out.

And if it was purely speculation, why did the let the price of oil go back downt o 40.

I give up dude, you're a lost cause. :roll:

Well if it purely speculation, then prices should still be high...

No, because every speculative bubble eventually pops.

And they pop because prices get to high, which forces those consumers to do something else.

Not in this case.

So you deny that both consumers and industry alike changed how they used oil, so they could use less of it? You deny that rig count went to high not seen in 30 years?

No, but that's not what burst this Bubble.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,805
6,361
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: sandorski
No, but that's not what burst this Bubble.

It all played a part. The bubble did not just collapse on its own.

It's already been explained why it collapsed. No one said it did on its' own.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: sandorski
No, but that's not what burst this Bubble.

It all played a part. The bubble did not just collapse on its own.

It's already been explained why it collapsed. No one said it did on its' own.

Yes it collapsed when the speculators could no longer flip contracts because supply started to exceed demand.