Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
If you could turn profits from 11 million to 243 million in 4 years while covering LESS people, costs are NOT the problem.
Keep repeating it though!
Costs ARE a problem. They are rising at more than twice the rate of inflation. No matter what level of profits you are seeking to achieve, higher health care costs that are covered drive premiums higher.
It's not that hard to understand. Get insurance quotes on a Camry vs a Rolls. The Rolls is much higher. Not because it's riskier, but because any cost that will be covered under the policy is much higher. reduce the costs of care, reduce the premium.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
We already pay for people using the ER as their personal doctor, yet you are worried about covering pre-existing conditions like allergies and acne? Makes complete sense.
I hear this repeated constantly and it's BS.
If you don't have an emergency you don't go to the ER unless you're an idiot. Bestowing HI upon an idiot doesn't make them smarter.
Even in my little town we have multiple out-patient clinincs, some right next to the hospital. That's where you go, whether or not you're insured, when you have an non-emergency type need.
The ER should simply re-direct those arriving without a bona-fide ER need to the outpatient clinic. Nor is there any reason for non-ER treatment given at an ER to be more expensive than similar treatment at a clinic.
BTW: None of this is addressed in the current UHC proposal as far as I can tell (it should have been).
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Who cares about fellow americans though? 15% tax to profit companies is important to keep. Just watch out if they deny you cancer coverage and cancel your health insurance because of your acne!
Federal level corporate tax is 35%, not 15%. Then there is state level income tax.
What's with the repeated BS about acne lately? The only people who never had acne arte those who haven't reached puberty yet. Too much hysteria.
"But I'll say this - people with pre-existing coverage are looking for others to subsidize their health care costs/"
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I'll say this, people who get sick or get cancer are looking for others to subsidize them. Oh, you mean like insurance? The whole idea is based on subsidizing. How about taking that $243 million in profit a year to subsidize them along with the 24 million dollar ceo salary? That's what would be done with UHC.
No insurance is not "subsidizing", it's a pooling of risk. Once the event has occurred, it's no longer "risk", but an actuality.
I'm no defender of HI companies, I've criticized them and their lame policies here frequently. But the level of hysteria and exaggeration in these threads is ridiculous.
Fern
"Among the other testimony heard by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation was that of Robin Beaton. It reflected some of the insurance company tactics condemned by Potter.
It was a nightmare scenario. The day before she was scheduled to undergo a double mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, Robin Beaton's health insurance company informed her that she was "red flagged" and they wouldn't pay for her surgery. The hospital wanted a $30,000 deposit before they would move forward. Beaton had no choice but to forgo the life-saving surgery.
Beaton had dutifully signed up for individual insurance when she retired from nursing to start a small business. She had never missed a payment, but that didn't matter. Blue Cross cited two earlier, unrelated conditions that she hadn't reported to them when signing up ? acne and a fast beating heart ? and rescinded her policy.
Beaton pleaded with the company and had her doctors write letters on her behalf to no avail. It was not until Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) personally called Blue Cross that her policy was reinstated and she could undergo surgery. In that year, Beaton's tumor doubled in size, leading to further complications necessitating the removal of her lymph glands as well."
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/profile.html
Of course, if you actually read the sources, you'd know that.
And no, if we pay DOUBLE every other country and still have 50 million uninsured and countless millions with pre-existing conditions exempted while profits go up 1000%, costs are not related.
"Federal level corporate tax is 35%, not 15%. Then there is state level income tax. "
15% is how much people generally pay for their insurance.
"The annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $12,700."
The median income of this country is 40k. That $12,700 to a profit company is essentially a tax paid, without counting for costs of everything denied or exempted from you.
http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml -according to The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Employee Health Benefits: 2008 Annual Survey. September 2008.