The Public Option...

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
If you could turn profits from 11 million to 243 million in 4 years while covering LESS people, costs are NOT the problem.

Keep repeating it though!

Costs ARE a problem. They are rising at more than twice the rate of inflation. No matter what level of profits you are seeking to achieve, higher health care costs that are covered drive premiums higher.

It's not that hard to understand. Get insurance quotes on a Camry vs a Rolls. The Rolls is much higher. Not because it's riskier, but because any cost that will be covered under the policy is much higher. reduce the costs of care, reduce the premium.

Originally posted by: shadow9d9
We already pay for people using the ER as their personal doctor, yet you are worried about covering pre-existing conditions like allergies and acne? Makes complete sense.

I hear this repeated constantly and it's BS.

If you don't have an emergency you don't go to the ER unless you're an idiot. Bestowing HI upon an idiot doesn't make them smarter.

Even in my little town we have multiple out-patient clinincs, some right next to the hospital. That's where you go, whether or not you're insured, when you have an non-emergency type need.

The ER should simply re-direct those arriving without a bona-fide ER need to the outpatient clinic. Nor is there any reason for non-ER treatment given at an ER to be more expensive than similar treatment at a clinic.

BTW: None of this is addressed in the current UHC proposal as far as I can tell (it should have been).

Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Who cares about fellow americans though? 15% tax to profit companies is important to keep. Just watch out if they deny you cancer coverage and cancel your health insurance because of your acne!

Federal level corporate tax is 35%, not 15%. Then there is state level income tax.

What's with the repeated BS about acne lately? The only people who never had acne arte those who haven't reached puberty yet. Too much hysteria.

"But I'll say this - people with pre-existing coverage are looking for others to subsidize their health care costs/"

Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I'll say this, people who get sick or get cancer are looking for others to subsidize them. Oh, you mean like insurance? The whole idea is based on subsidizing. How about taking that $243 million in profit a year to subsidize them along with the 24 million dollar ceo salary? That's what would be done with UHC.

No insurance is not "subsidizing", it's a pooling of risk. Once the event has occurred, it's no longer "risk", but an actuality.

I'm no defender of HI companies, I've criticized them and their lame policies here frequently. But the level of hysteria and exaggeration in these threads is ridiculous.

Fern


"Among the other testimony heard by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation was that of Robin Beaton. It reflected some of the insurance company tactics condemned by Potter.

It was a nightmare scenario. The day before she was scheduled to undergo a double mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, Robin Beaton's health insurance company informed her that she was "red flagged" and they wouldn't pay for her surgery. The hospital wanted a $30,000 deposit before they would move forward. Beaton had no choice but to forgo the life-saving surgery.

Beaton had dutifully signed up for individual insurance when she retired from nursing to start a small business. She had never missed a payment, but that didn't matter. Blue Cross cited two earlier, unrelated conditions that she hadn't reported to them when signing up ? acne and a fast beating heart ? and rescinded her policy.

Beaton pleaded with the company and had her doctors write letters on her behalf to no avail. It was not until Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) personally called Blue Cross that her policy was reinstated and she could undergo surgery. In that year, Beaton's tumor doubled in size, leading to further complications necessitating the removal of her lymph glands as well."


http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/profile.html


Of course, if you actually read the sources, you'd know that.

And no, if we pay DOUBLE every other country and still have 50 million uninsured and countless millions with pre-existing conditions exempted while profits go up 1000%, costs are not related.



"Federal level corporate tax is 35%, not 15%. Then there is state level income tax. "

15% is how much people generally pay for their insurance.

"The annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $12,700."

The median income of this country is 40k. That $12,700 to a profit company is essentially a tax paid, without counting for costs of everything denied or exempted from you.


http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml -according to The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Employee Health Benefits: 2008 Annual Survey. September 2008.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RyanPaulShaffer
Shh...it's supposed to be a secret! Despite all of the lies being spouted by Obama, when people start reading the bill, they come across monstrosities like this.

It is very real, and you should be very afraid.

LOL @ you and your lies and secrets and general FUD. If you think what's being kicked around is anything close to what will be put to vote you're crazy.

I lived through 2000-2008 under what I (and many) consider to be the worst president in modern history. I think I'll live through your 'monstrosities' under Obama.

That's a very interesting perspective. Can you name one specific, direct legislation that Bush signed, or executive order that he issued, that impacted you directly?

The only one I can think of are tax cuts. I'm open for others...

Don't derail, take that to another thread.
What cereal box did you get your deputy moderator badge from?

 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

Again, we'll take the word of the CBO over you. Sorry for your luck.

 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: blanghorst
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

Again, we'll take the word of the CBO over you. Sorry for your luck.
They weren't my words. They were all quoted from multiple sources. Don't let facts get in the way of what you want to hear!
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: blanghorst
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

Again, we'll take the word of the CBO over you. Sorry for your luck.

""Among the other testimony heard by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation was that of Robin Beaton. It reflected some of the insurance company tactics condemned by Potter.

It was a nightmare scenario. The day before she was scheduled to undergo a double mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, Robin Beaton's health insurance company informed her that she was "red flagged" and they wouldn't pay for her surgery. The hospital wanted a $30,000 deposit before they would move forward. Beaton had no choice but to forgo the life-saving surgery.

Beaton had dutifully signed up for individual insurance when she retired from nursing to start a small business. She had never missed a payment, but that didn't matter. Blue Cross cited two earlier, unrelated conditions that she hadn't reported to them when signing up ? acne and a fast beating heart ? and rescinded her policy.

Beaton pleaded with the company and had her doctors write letters on her behalf to no avail. It was not until Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) personally called Blue Cross that her policy was reinstated and she could undergo surgery. In that year, Beaton's tumor doubled in size, leading to further complications necessitating the removal of her lymph glands as well."


http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/profile.html "


You like to ignore reality.

How will the current plan fix this WITHOUT increasing costs?

 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: blanghorst
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

Again, we'll take the word of the CBO over you. Sorry for your luck.
They weren't my words. They were all quoted from multiple sources. Don't let facts get in the way of what you want to hear!

You are the one letting facts get in the way. The CBO clearly says costs are an issue, which you say are not.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: blanghorst
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: blanghorst
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

Again, we'll take the word of the CBO over you. Sorry for your luck.
They weren't my words. They were all quoted from multiple sources. Don't let facts get in the way of what you want to hear!

You are the one letting facts get in the way. The CBO clearly says costs are an issue, which you say are not.

I say we pay double what other countries pay and get less. I say there are more important issues than costs in the end.

It is a FACT that insurances have made 400-1000% profit over 5 years while covering less.

"Profits at 10 of the country?s largest publicly traded health insurance companies rose 428 percent from 2000 to 2007, while consumers paid more for less

coverage. One of the major reasons, according to a new study, is the growing lack of competition in the private health insurance industry that has led to

near monopoly conditions in many markets."

http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/05...-create-near-monopoly/



Take a look at a recent report "Insuring Health or Ensuring Profit?; A look at the Financial Gains of Washington's Health Insurers." According to the

report, the big three carriers in Washington, Regence BlueShield, Premera Blue Cross and Group Health Cooperative saw profits increase from $11 million

in 2002 to $243 million in 2003 and $431 million in 2006. Their cash surplus went from $833 million in 2002 to $2.2 billion (with a "B") in 2006.

Interestingly enough they did it while covering less people. Over 2.37 million people were covered by the three in 2002 compared to 1.9 million in 2006.

http://vancouver.injuryboard.c...r.aspx?googleid=230780



Potter, who spent 15 years at CIGNA, said health plans have a financial incentive to cancel the policies of their most costly members and have

implemented strategies to do so. ?They look carefully to see if a sick policyholder may have omitted a minor illness, a pre-existing condition, when

applying for coverage, and then they use that as justification to cancel the policy,? he testified. And canceling policies for even a small number of

such members can have ?a big effect? on the bottom line, he added. ?Where is the logic and the humanity of having pre-existing conditions not covered in

our society?? Potter asked. He noted that his testimony wasn?t aimed at CIGNA specifically, but rather at an industry that he said is ?taking this

country in the wrong direction.?

http://www.aishealth.com/Bnow/hbd070909.html

""They confuse their customers and dump the sick ? all so they can satisfy their Wall Street investors," said Wendell Potter, who retired as CIGNA's vice

president of corporate communications last year. He spent nearly 15 years at the company and four years at Humana."

"Potter, for instance, recalled a trip on a corporate jet from Philadelphia, where CIGNA is headquartered, to Connecticut, where the company's health

insurance business is based in Bloomfield. During the flight, he was served lunch on gold-rimmed china with a gold-plated knife and fork.

"I realized for the first time that someone's insurance premiums were paying for me to travel in such luxury," he said on his blog."

"He condemned insurers' efforts to get rid of unprofitable customers, sell policies that can mislead consumers and offer very limited coverage, and pay

out as small a portion of premiums as possible for claims in order to boost profits and please Wall Street."

"Potter described in written testimony how insurers use "purging" ? unrealistic rate increases ? to drive off less profitable employers. Citing a USA

Today report, he recalled how CIGNA boosted rates in 2006 for the Entertainment Industry Group Insurance Trust so much that for some family plans,

premiums would have topped $44,000 a year."

"CIGNA, responding to Potter's testimony, said Wednesday, "Although we respect that there are different opinions on the solutions, we strongly disagree

with the suggestion that, motivated by profits, the insurance industry has deliberately attempted to confuse or unfairly treat covered individuals.""

http://www.courant.com/busines...tjun25,0,4107201.story


"Among the other testimony heard by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation was that of Robin Beaton. It reflected some of the insurance

company tactics condemned by Potter.

It was a nightmare scenario. The day before she was scheduled to undergo a double mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, Robin Beaton's health insurance

company informed her that she was "red flagged" and they wouldn't pay for her surgery. The hospital wanted a $30,000 deposit before they would move

forward. Beaton had no choice but to forgo the life-saving surgery.

Beaton had dutifully signed up for individual insurance when she retired from nursing to start a small business. She had never missed a payment, but that

didn't matter. Blue Cross cited two earlier, unrelated conditions that she hadn't reported to them when signing up ? acne and a fast beating heart ? and

rescinded her policy.

Beaton pleaded with the company and had her doctors write letters on her behalf to no avail. It was not until Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) personally called

Blue Cross that her policy was reinstated and she could undergo surgery. In that year, Beaton's tumor doubled in size, leading to further complications

necessitating the removal of her lymph glands as well."


http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/profile.html


Of course, if you actually read the sources, you'd know that.

And no, if we pay DOUBLE every other country and still have 50 million uninsured and countless millions with pre-existing conditions exempted while

profits go up 1000%, costs are not related.




"The annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $12,700."

The median income of this country is 40k. That $12,700 to a profit company is essentially a tax paid, without counting for costs of everything denied or

exempted from you.


http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml -according to The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Employee Health Benefits: 2008 Annual Survey. September 2008.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
As soon as the actual facts and evidence come in, the shills disappear. Shocker!

You do realize that not everyone can be online 24/7 like you?

I've reread your posts in this thread, putting aside the anecdotal and/or emotional type stuff, your support for UC comes down to your complaints about HI companies. Again, I don't support and have complained against them myself (one of the reasons I oppose this legislation). The concerns about their lack of competition and the resulting growth in profits in valid. No doubt there are legitimate complaints about their denail of coverage for some proceedures (just as there are likely cases where the denial is proper).

To the point - do you understand that the puiblic (gov provided) insurance option is an on-again off-again part of this legislation? I personally think it highly unlikely to make it into the final bill; there are about 500k employees in that industry and the wide-spread belief is the public insurance option would drive them all out of business fairly quickly.

If there is no public option, what you are left with is a bill that forces us to buy insurance from the very companies that you hate. And that has been my long-standing opposition to the core of the Dems UHC plan - get everybody on insurance. Again, as I have said several times in thread and numerous other times - insurance reform must come 1st before this type of UHC is enacted.

Cliffs: Your "damn the torpedos, full speed ahead" approach is most likely going to drive us all into the arms of the very HI companies you hate with no meaningful reforms to their product/policies or behavior. Is that what you want? If not, let's slow down and make sure what we get is something beneficial. Otherwise, you may end up with your worse-case nightmare.

Fern