• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Official Walker vs. Barrett Debate Thread.

Walker vs. Barrett debate: Who will win?

  • Walker

  • Barrett

  • I don't know/I don't care

Results are only viewable after voting.
Democrats needs to win the public over in this debate, I suspect. I don't know him.

I know he's no Arnold Schwarzeneggar, but hopefully he'll win.
 
When did the mind control ray go out and make all the libs have to spew "Koch Bros" every time they get into a spittle creating tyrade?
 
I don't know what's to debate. Walker will stand there like the lying stooge he is and maintain he created 30 thousand jobs, exactly 60 thousand more that the Government has counted job loss, for the biggest error in government history. I don't know why they recalled him, they should have gone in there with pitchforks and tossed him. This recall is just a statement to those who can see how the Supreme court fuck the American people when they ruled that money is speech.
 
sportage said:
You do realize there is a Three Stooges marathon airing at the same time on another channel? Hard choice....
Click to expand...

President Obama, Vice-President Biden and Senator Reid are giving marathon speeches? Cool what channel and time? Just curious which one is playing Moe?
 
Moonbeam said:
I don't know what's to debate. Walker will stand there like the lying stooge he is and maintain he created 30 thousand jobs, exactly 60 thousand more that the Government has counted job loss, for the biggest error in government history. I don't know why they recalled him, they should have gone in there with pitchforks and tossed him. This recall is just a statement to those who can see how the Supreme court fuck the American people when they ruled that money is speech.
Click to expand...

one small set of federal goverment numbers showed a lose of jobs.

one large set of federal goverment numbers showed a gain of jobs.


Why do you belive one set of goverment numbers but not the others?
 
Moonbeam said:
I doubt you really care because you did nothing to suggest why I shouldn't but if you go here:

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wiscon...-to-create-jobs-number-fe5ht47-153791995.html

you will see that Walker's claims are mostly false.
Click to expand...


It don't matter what the truth is. With the galactic-ally stupid decision by the SCOTUS finding that Free Speech extends to Corporations we lost the ability to provide with convincing backup anything that conflicts with the barrage of faulty interpretations provided by Big Money Corporations in any race they wish to corrupt.

We desperately need to Amend the Constitution to create a fair and much less expensive means to select every level of our representative Government.

We should also consider Amending the Constitution to eliminate the games the Senate plays... IF the people elect a majority of Conservatives then they should hold sway...
And, SCOTUS justices should have a 10 year term with renomination possible. Life terms for what appears to be Politically active Justices who wouldn't or at best vaguely answered questions during the 'approval' process in the Senate seems to be an imperative.
 
LunarRay said:
It don't matter what the truth is. With the galactic-ally stupid decision by the SCOTUS finding that Free Speech extends to Corporations we lost the ability to provide with convincing backup anything that conflicts with the barrage of faulty interpretations provided by Big Money Corporations in any race they wish to corrupt.

We desperately need to Amend the Constitution to create a fair and much less expensive means to select every level of our representative Government.

We should also consider Amending the Constitution to eliminate the games the Senate plays... IF the people elect a majority of Conservatives then they should hold sway...
And, SCOTUS justices should have a 10 year term with renomination possible. Life terms for what appears to be Politically active Justices who wouldn't or at best vaguely answered questions during the 'approval' process in the Senate seems to be an imperative.
Click to expand...

Long before any of this happens, I think, we will all be speaking Chinese.
 
Moonbeam said:
I doubt you really care because you did nothing to suggest why I shouldn't but if you go here:

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wiscon...-to-create-jobs-number-fe5ht47-153791995.html

you will see that Walker's claims are mostly false.
Click to expand...

did you read your link?

Its fact that wisconsin gained numbers last year.

But somehow idiot libertards cannot stand that fact.

heres another article explaining the difference, not that it will matter to brain dead union puppets like yourself

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statep...e-requires-closer-look-kc5i8b3-154560275.html
 
I didn't catch the debate, however what I know is this.

I live in WI, my wife and I work hard, make decent money, and pay our taxes. We own a house and live comfortably. Additional taxes on us would make life more difficult.

I appreciate that Walker was able to fix WI's budget defecit without raising our taxes any more.

I also don't feel that public sector employees need to be represented by a union and see the conflict of interest when the school board members and unions who are supposed to negotiate contracts are playing for the same team.

I support Gov Walker.
 
Last edited:
michal1980 said:
did you read your link?

Its fact that wisconsin gained numbers last year.

But somehow idiot libertards cannot stand that fact.

heres another article explaining the difference, not that it will matter to brain dead union puppets like yourself

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statep...e-requires-closer-look-kc5i8b3-154560275.html
Click to expand...

My statement was the Walker's job claims are mostly lies which is what your and my link said:

"Walker's ad says there are 33,200 more jobs in Wisconsin since he took office.

To reach the number, he combined two data sets - one that involves unofficial (but generally more accurate) numbers that could change in the weeks after the election; the other is volatile, but still official monthly numbers. From an accounting standpoint this would be flagged as a mistake. From a political standpoint, he is mixing and matching to present the best possible view.

Walker presents it all as final and official, offering no cautionary notes or caveats - even though there are many.

And Walker credits his policies for the improvement, which overstates the impact a governor can make on broad economic trends in a short period of time.

There is clearly some truth to the numbers. But in mixing everything together and not making it clear these numbers are preliminary, Walker ignores critical facts that would give a different impression.

That is our definition for Mostly False."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top