Why would anyone need to stream the superbowl? It's available in HD on basic cable or OTA.
I want the packers to win but realistically I think the steelers are
I'd love to see Pouncey in because he's not only a pro bowl center but a real class act rookie. The league could use more guys like him, but I'd hate to see an injury in his first year turn into something more serious.
The football stadium can fit 72 percent of the town inside of it. One in every 54,000 Chicagoans is a Bears' fan, but one in 1,900 Green Bay residents is a Packers' fan.
Fox is asking between $2.8 and $3 million for 30-second spots, which comes out to $100,000 per second. Companies should do something else with this money than make a stupid commercial, feeding the homeless or buying p.c.'s for a school would get them more respect in my book.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6079827
I'm confused. If the stadium can hold 72% of the population of Green Bay, but only 1/1900 people in Green Bay are packers fans, wouldn't that pretty much equate to an empty stadium? And how is only 1/1900 people a fan. That seems ridiculously low. These numbers seem completely wrong.
Really? Feeding the homeless isn't going to make them money. Advertising during the single most highly viewed program in the world will make them a ton of money. They aren't operating a charity.Fox is asking between $2.8 and $3 million for 30-second spots, which comes out to $100,000 per second. Companies should do something else with this money than make a stupid commercial, feeding the homeless or buying p.c.'s for a school would get them more respect in my book.
Yeah, that's a horribly written article. I have no idea what he means by 1/1900 people are Packer fans. I don't think you'd have to talk to 1900 people in Green Bay to find a single Packer fan. And actually, take the population of Green Bay (101k) and divide by 1900 and that's 53. So there are 53 Packer fans in Green Bay. Sounds about right.
I emailed the author to see what he meant. It sounds like he wrote that part while drunk or something.
EDIT: Ooh, I think I figured it out. He meant 1/1,900 Green Bay residents is a Packer player, while 1/54,000 Chicago residents is a Bears player.
Green Bay's population is 101,000, divide by 1,900 and you get about 53 (size of an NFL roster). Chicago's population is 2.9 million, divide by 54,000 and you also get about 53.
Anyway, this is a freaking fantastic article that came out last week on the concussion crisis and exuberant play in football. It's a bit mroe complex than most of us have acknowledged...it even caused me to reconsider my more abrasive opinions of certain players. :sneaky:
also pretty much settles the "biggest pussy sport" ..."argument"
every football fan should read this,
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/31/110131fa_fact_mcgrath