The Official Republican voter suppression/election fraud thread

Page 18 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,309
4,953
136
And when you run out of ways to intimidate voters, you can always go the way of this 18-yr-old lad who threatened Harris supporters with a machete. It happened, of course, in Florida.

Caleb Williams has been charged with aggravated assault on a person 65 years of age or older and improper exhibition of a firearm or dangerous weapon as well as voter intimidation or suppression.

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
And when you run out of ways to intimidate voters, you can always go the way of this 18-yr-old lad who threatened Harris supporters with a machete. It happened, of course, in Florida.

Caleb Williams has been charged with aggravated assault on a person 65 years of age or older and improper exhibition of a firearm or dangerous weapon as well as voter intimidation or suppression.

Man the Bears just can't catch a break.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: compcons

DarthKyrie

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2016
1,617
1,395
146
And when you run out of ways to intimidate voters, you can always go the way of this 18-yr-old lad who threatened Harris supporters with a machete. It happened, of course, in Florida.

Caleb Williams has been charged with aggravated assault on a person 65 years of age or older and improper exhibition of a firearm or dangerous weapon as well as voter intimidation or suppression.

I doubt this idiot learned anything from this.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,343
4,973
136
Only white male property owning church goers whose parents and grand parents were born on continental US soil.

Glenn Youngkin Wants Voting Rules Changed Nationwide

The Virginia governor said he hoped for a Republican-run Congress and White House to implement new registration rules.



To be fair IF you check a box stating that you are not a citizen or not check the box indicating that you are a citizen then you have to assume that the person is not a citizen. Removed from the roles, notified at their last known address and they have two weeks to correct any errors and re-register.

Even then they can show up at the polling station register to vote and still vote a provisional ballot on election day in Virginia.

It wasn't a purge. It was an individual action based on the registered persons input.

Common sense and the law dictates that non-citizens should not vote or be registered to vote in a national election.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,395
3,812
136
To be fair IF you check a box stating that you are not a citizen or not check the box indicating that you are a citizen then you have to assume that the person is not a citizen. Removed from the roles, notified at their last known address and they have two weeks to correct any errors and re-register.

Even then they can show up at the polling station register to vote and still vote a provisional ballot on election day in Virginia.

It wasn't a purge. It was an individual action based on the registered persons input.

Common sense and the law dictates that non-citizens should not vote or be registered to vote in a national election.


I have read over how to register to vote in Virginia…. A drivers license is not document that has anything to do with voting.. it’s like the education department seeking guidance from the sanitation department

Number 2. In my state a drivers license is valid for 4 years. When they received their license they could have not been a citizen but became one and not updated their license

Number 3 they violated the federal 90 days to update the voter registration. They could have done it 6 months ago and no one would have cared. But they did a dick move
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,565
10,243
136
Get a load of this MAGAt pussy. First he gets confronted on camera for stealing and destroying Harris/Walz signs at an early voting site. But then he had the audacity to tell the newscaster on a phone call after the fact that HE is the victim because a 70+ old lady “touched” him, causing him to drop his keys and break a keychain (he likely dropped them while attempting to rip up the signs with his keys.)

His shit-for-MAGAT-brains thinks that it’s his God given right to destroy signs on public property because he is essentially just cleaning up litter and exercising HIS free speech.

Why are MAGATS so fucking dumb?

 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,780
8,353
136
Get a load of this MAGAt pussy. First he gets confronted on camera for stealing and destroying Harris/Walz signs at an early voting site. But then he had the audacity to tell the newscaster on a phone call after the fact that HE is the victim because a 70+ old lady “touched” him, causing him to drop his keys and break a keychain (he likely dropped them while attempting to rip up the signs with his keys.)

His shit-for-MAGAT-brains thinks that it’s his God given right to destroy signs on public property because he is essentially just cleaning up litter and exercising HIS free speech.

Why are MAGATS so fucking dumb?


And there's Darth Bannon in the shadows across the street rolling palm over fist hissing out "yeeeeesssssss, yeeeeessss, that's it....that's it young MAGAt.

True to life it is.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,284
2,380
136
To be fair IF you check a box stating that you are not a citizen or not check the box indicating that you are a citizen then you have to assume that the person is not a citizen. Removed from the roles, notified at their last known address and they have two weeks to correct any errors and re-register.

Even then they can show up at the polling station register to vote and still vote a provisional ballot on election day in Virginia.

It wasn't a purge. It was an individual action based on the registered persons input.

Common sense and the law dictates that non-citizens should not vote or be registered to vote in a national election.



To be fair, the MAGA republican states are purposely breaking the 90 day quiet period law. It doesn't matter what the problem is, states by law cannot remove anyone from the voter roles in the 90 day period. MAGAs are doing this to create election chaos and to get their supporters riled up because MAGAs are idiots and they only see one thing when this happens - oh noes, we can't let 1 single illegal immigrant vote. [These states had plenty of time to perform their voter roll checks before the 90 day quiet period] MAGA republican states are jamming up the court system with this crap going all the way to SCOTUS. After the election they will use their illegal actions to try and justify there was election fraud [if trump loses]. trump and his MAGAs have really fucked up our country.

edited.
 
Last edited:

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,993
1,433
136
In KY they had a proposed constitutional amendment for the state, under the guise of non citizens not being allowed to vote in the state. Which is already illegal.

At the very end of you read it. It said #3 Idiots and Insane people.

Who gets to decide who are idiots? "The General Assembly"
They are also the ones that wanted to take money from public schools and allocate it to private schools.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,284
2,380
136
In KY they had a proposed constitutional amendment for the state, under the guise of non citizens not being allowed to vote in the state. Which is already illegal.

At the very end of you read it. It said #3 Idiots and Insane people.

Who gets to decide who are idiots? "The General Assembly"
They are also the ones that wanted to take money from public schools and allocate it to private schools.



I just had to go look that up about idiots. That would exclude most of the MAGA folks, LOL.

Section 145 Persons entitled to vote. Every citizen of the United States of the age of eighteen years who has resided in the state one year, and in the county six months, and the precinct in which he offers to vote sixty days next preceding the election, shall be a voter in said precinct and not elsewhere but the following persons are excepted and shall not have the right to vote. 1. Persons convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of treason, or felony, or bribery in an election, or of such high misdemeanor as the General Assembly may declare shall operate as an exclusion from the right of suffrage, but persons hereby excluded may be restored to their civil rights by executive pardon. 2. Persons who, at the time of the election, are in confinement under the judgment of a court for some penal offense. 3. Idiots and insane persons. Text as Ratified on: November 8, 1955. History: 1955 amendment was proposed by 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 2, sec. 1; original version ratified August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,343
4,973
136
To be fair, the MAGA republican states are purposely breaking the 90 day quiet period law. It doesn't matter what the problem is, states by law cannot remove anyone from the voter roles in the 90 day period. MAGAs are doing this to create election chaos and to get their supporters riled up because MAGAs are idiots and they only see one thing when this happens - oh noes, we can't let 1 single illegal immigrant vote. [These states had plenty of time to perform their voter roll checks before the 90 day quiet period] MAGA republican states are jamming up the court system with this crap going all the way to SCOTUS. After the election they will use their illegal actions to try and justify there was election fraud [if trump loses]. trump and his MAGAs have really fucked up our country.

edited.



After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit left Giles’ order in place, the state came to the Supreme Court. Virginia maintained that the NVRA’s “quiet period” provision does not apply to Youngkin’s order because the law does not bar the removal of noncitizens who were not eligible to vote in the first place. But in any event, the state added, its voter-purge program is not the kind of “systematic” program prohibited by the “quiet period” provision, but instead an “individualized process” that gives the would-be voter two chances to correct any mistakes about citizenship status.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,395
136


After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit left Giles’ order in place, the state came to the Supreme Court. Virginia maintained that the NVRA’s “quiet period” provision does not apply to Youngkin’s order because the law does not bar the removal of noncitizens who were not eligible to vote in the first place. But in any event, the state added, its voter-purge program is not the kind of “systematic” program prohibited by the “quiet period” provision, but instead an “individualized process” that gives the would-be voter two chances to correct any mistakes about citizenship status.
Hey. Your shitty party is going to lose on Tuesday.

Let me send you some sandpaper spiked with hot sauce for your tears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie