After reading your first thread, I decided and went for the MSI a few weeks ago. I had all items for a second box (except mobo and video) and this was an excellent choice).
I also recommend the MSI over Asus - in the last years I had only problems with Asus boards - including problems with cold boot and finally a sudden death on the first AN8 board - it was not even overclocked. After that, I have stayed clear of Asus. I had many MSI's in the meanwhile and ZERO problems.
In my case (3700+ San Diego, 1GB Crucial Ballistix) the original BIOS 3.00 was not stable even at default speeds. After going through your thread I tried the Beta 3.13 and despite the fewer choices for O/C (ram dividers), it was stable.
I am running my SD @ 2400 (218x11) and Crucial Ballistix @218 (2.5-2-2) since many days, no problems. Prime95 stable for 16 hours (I stopped the test). I am using also Cool and Quite, it works when overclocked also.
Now the rig is a Aspire Qpack case. I have just to replace the original case fan for a quiet operation.
Many thanks for your thread!!
I also recommend the MSI over Asus - in the last years I had only problems with Asus boards - including problems with cold boot and finally a sudden death on the first AN8 board - it was not even overclocked. After that, I have stayed clear of Asus. I had many MSI's in the meanwhile and ZERO problems.
In my case (3700+ San Diego, 1GB Crucial Ballistix) the original BIOS 3.00 was not stable even at default speeds. After going through your thread I tried the Beta 3.13 and despite the fewer choices for O/C (ram dividers), it was stable.
I am running my SD @ 2400 (218x11) and Crucial Ballistix @218 (2.5-2-2) since many days, no problems. Prime95 stable for 16 hours (I stopped the test). I am using also Cool and Quite, it works when overclocked also.
Now the rig is a Aspire Qpack case. I have just to replace the original case fan for a quiet operation.
Many thanks for your thread!!