Phokus
Lifer
- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
I'm not saying they got anything wrong per se. I'm saying that they have a glaringly obvious agenda that severely diminishes their credibilty. Surely you can see this.
My take on this article is that they're advocating that wealth inequities are solely related to tax rates and the rich should be taxed more to compensate....simple as that. It makes no attempt to analyze other potential causes of income inequities and other possible solutions. This kind of shit is the epitome of intellectual dishonesty.
Come on...I know you're an incredibly smart guy....please do yourself a favor and stop drinking the koolaid.
I don't see where they explicitly say tax rates are the only problem (it certainly is PART of the problem, but i would probably rank the mobility of capital/global labor arbitrage/technological changes as a bigger part of it). They're just basically reposting data from other sources (and sourcing them).
Edit: They don't even really have all that much commentary.
