werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
This article lost a lot of credit with me as impartial once they grouped anyone making under $165k as the bottom 90%.
I don't fall in the top 10% but I certainly don't fit in with the people making $31k. How about a more realistic breakdown. I'm sure there are a ton of people in the 50-75k range alone.
Somebody slap Craig, he's stuck on stupid again.
I don't think the disparity really matters for the US. Even most of those in the lower income brackets have housing with heat and AC, they have HD TV's and cable, computers and internet and do not go hungry. Not a whole lot for them to get upset over.
LOL Probably true, not not a sufficient reason for him not to be slapped.That kind of stupid can't be fixed.
Have you considered becoming a government?I eat and have a computer and internet... But my cash flow is negative. Credit is an amazing thing.
Lol...I'm not "riled up" or "bitching"...just trying to have a civil discussion. But I'm getting a vibe that this may be difficult for you.You can volunteer to pay more so they can pay less. No skin off of my back.
Not sure how you arrive that they aren't doing better. Their percent of income went up by 305% while their percent of tax went up 246%. If their tax rates would have remained the same, it would have went up by 305% instead of 246%. Just exactly what is wrong with that picture that has you riled up?
Are you bitching because the people, who's incomes have regressed after inflation for the last decade + aren't paying enough? You wanting the lower's to pay more so the uppers can pay less?
Lol...I'm not "riled up" or "bitching"...just trying to have a civil discussion. But I'm getting a vibe that this may be difficult for you.
No really. Fair tax as I understand it is a flat tax @~20-25% no deductions no exclusions, no discounts from source.. e.g. capital gains, dividends all count.. No rich pay 20% now. It's said they pay 17% but it's really much much lower because they reduce basis via expenses tremendously which s not allowed under fair tax.95% of what is said about liberals here is wrong or lies, I can't remember the other 5%.
No, you're not. That's what progressives are for that the right including you fight them on as your 'policies'.
You are just too clueless to understand the effect of the policies you push.
You are a dupe of the right-wing propaganda to sell you on polices - let's take the dishonestly named 'fair tax' for example, that does nothing but shift taxes off the rich.
That's the point of their propaganda, lie to you to get you to back policies good for them.
No really. Fair tax as I understand it is a flat tax @~20-25% no deductions no exclusions, no discounts from source.. e.g. capital gains.. No rich pay 20% now. It's said they pay 17% but it's really much much lower because they reduce basis via expenses tremendously which s not allowed under fair tax.
Yes...the rich got richer all right...but the important question to ask is "Why?". It might be wise to answer this before jumping to conclusions that increased taxation is the answer to the problem.Didnt slow em down none from getting richer.
Me too...let's keep it that way. Have a good weekend!Nah, I'm in a good mood today. Like I said, no skin off my back.
Somebody above mentioned the fact that the rich are getting richer off of the backs of labor being outsourced to China.
That's 100% of the problem, China. The second we brand them a currency manipulator and slap a tariff on them is the second you see a HUGE portion of jobs come back here. It's also the reason why we are persuing QE.
We are loading a 357 and putting it against China's head. They either revalue or they drown in inflation. One way or another, this bullshit has to end.
I only wish our politicians had the balls to stand up against the people who are not only outsourcing jobs to China for labor arbitrage, but also doubling down by investing a huge amount of money with the Chinese for superior returns.
The engineer with a masters degree whose job was eliminated and shipped off somewhere else because he was 'too expensive'. Was he lazy/unmotivated? The more white collar jobs get eliminated, the more competition there is for those few remaining jobs and wages will be brought down and there will be mass unemployment. This isn't just affecting your 'lazy poor people'.
Then maybe we Americans need to start living more humble lives and take lower pay. I mean if someone somewhere else is willing to do it for cheaper... we have to compete so we have to offer better incentives than just "cheaper" the problem is, we can't.
Well the top 1% earns 22% of income and pay 40% of total taxes... so the tax system is obviously still progressive. Unless their income is really much much more than 22% of total because they have ways of disguising income, like stock options.
Yes...the rich got richer all right...but the important question to ask is "Why?". It might be wise to answer this before jumping to conclusions that increased taxation is the answer to the problem.
Then maybe we Americans need to start living more humble lives and take lower pay. I mean if someone somewhere else is willing to do it for cheaper... we have to compete so we have to offer better incentives than just "cheaper" the problem is, we can't.
Well the top 1% earns 22% of income and pay 40% of total taxes... so the tax system is obviously still progressive. Unless their income is really much much more than 22% of total because they have ways of disguising income, like stock options.
Then maybe we Americans need to start living more humble lives and take lower pay.
Somebody above mentioned the fact that the rich are getting richer off of the backs of labor being outsourced to China.
That's 100% of the problem, China. The second we brand them a currency manipulator and slap a tariff on them is the second you see a HUGE portion of jobs come back here. It's also the reason why we are persuing QE.
We are loading a 357 and putting it against China's head. They either revalue or they drown in inflation. One way or another, this bullshit has to end.
I only wish our politicians had the balls to stand up against the people who are not only outsourcing jobs to China for labor arbitrage, but also doubling down by investing a huge amount of money with the Chinese for superior returns.
Reality doesn't lie either. Worthless piece of shits stay worthless, producers make money.
Its labor and regulation arbitrage. The sheer fact of the matter is that we have setup factories and other industry that would not meet many US pollution and other regulation. Moving many of these jobs back to the USA would not only cause an increase in cost via the labor rate but also the increase regulatory cost so you are getting hit on two ends.
The Renminbi depreciation will only help on a labor or PPP problem it isn't going to help on a regulatory exchange problem.
To move jobs back to the USA we need both appreciation of the Chinese currency and a simultaneous increase in pollution and regulation in China or a decrease in our pollution and regulatory stance.
Going to China is something that most Americans can't even understand. No matter how much you hear it the pollution is SO much worse than anything you can imagine.