- Mar 4, 2011
- 11,395
- 1,189
- 126
I went in with an open mind. It sucks horribly.
1. Acting overall is terrible. Emma Watson was not a good pick as a provincial girl Belle. She's a capable actress, but 90% of the time- she did this awkward grin staring at CGI characters for 90 mins. You can't blame CGI for this, because there are tons of movies where IRL actors & CGI characters did a great job
Crap eating grin.
This facking grin right here.
The. WHOLE. MOVIE.
2. IRL character adaptations are awful. Gaston should've been much more buff. There are plenty of guys who could've pulled this off better. Beast sucks too- looks like a 150 pound cat than an imposing BEAST.
3. NO FACIAL EXPRESSIONS of Lumiere, Cogsworth, Chip & Mrs Potts. These characters CARRIED the original movie. They could've went with ANY CGI art direction - but they chose this stiff version, which results in them not engaging the audience. This is my biggest gripe.
This remake sucked. It made Disney pretty penny, but it's awful. Period.
1. Acting overall is terrible. Emma Watson was not a good pick as a provincial girl Belle. She's a capable actress, but 90% of the time- she did this awkward grin staring at CGI characters for 90 mins. You can't blame CGI for this, because there are tons of movies where IRL actors & CGI characters did a great job
Crap eating grin.

This facking grin right here.

The. WHOLE. MOVIE.

2. IRL character adaptations are awful. Gaston should've been much more buff. There are plenty of guys who could've pulled this off better. Beast sucks too- looks like a 150 pound cat than an imposing BEAST.
3. NO FACIAL EXPRESSIONS of Lumiere, Cogsworth, Chip & Mrs Potts. These characters CARRIED the original movie. They could've went with ANY CGI art direction - but they chose this stiff version, which results in them not engaging the audience. This is my biggest gripe.

This remake sucked. It made Disney pretty penny, but it's awful. Period.