Dear ch33zw1z:
You say, "Cool, prove God exists with tangible data that can be recreated over and over again."
By data you mean evidence.
What about that babies and roses are appearing again and again in every neighborhood, they are evidence to the existence of God, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
ch33zw1z Yesterday at 9:11 PM #477
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- Marius Dejess said:
Dear ch33zw1z:
You say, "Cool, prove God exists with tangible data that can be recreated over and over again."
By data you mean evidence.
What about that babies and roses are appearing again and again in every neighborhood, they are evidence to the existence of God, in concept as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
No, by data I mean data that God himself or herself exists. You're providing examples found in the world around you, that you attribute to a creator. Where, those same examples, are also explained by science. Again, this is faith (that gut feeling) creating a belief without the data to support it. IMO, you're entitled to this, you're not entitled to force it on others, or tell them their wrong until you can prove without a doubt you're right, with tangible data.
=================
Processed Cheese Ambassador to the Amused Fsck Off and Die Club
that's just God-bot gibberish.Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
that's just God-bot gibberish.
Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
Today at 12:17 AM #484 from Iron Woode
- Marius Dejess said:
Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
that's just God-bot gibberish.
Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
======================
Rig: Ryzen R5 3600, 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600, Asus Prime X570-P, Kingston A2000 1TB Nvme, Zotac GTX 1070 TI AMP!, Corsair Enthusiast Series TX650
TBF, I don't actually think you're a bot, but I do think you're a piece of shit and really wish you'd straight up fuck off forever.Dear readers, I ask you, according to your honest intelligent productive examination, which concept of evidence is simpler, easier, and quicker to comprehend and that correctly, mine or Iron Woode's?
Dear ch33zw1z:
I see that you are not accustomed to precision thinking at all.
Take the word evidence or what you call tangible data, show me that you know what is evidence, by giving me at least two examples of evidence, and most important what the examples are evidence to.
Dear readers, let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness any instance of precision thinking with ch33zw1z.
that's just God-bot gibberish.
Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
His definition is correct, yours is wooly minded bollocks that doesn't mean anything.Dear Iron Woode:
Thanks, first of all, that you recognize me to be not any bot, now to the business of us two concurring on a mutually agreed on concept on what is evidence.
I say:
Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
You say:
Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
Dear readers, I ask you, according to your honest intelligent productive examination, which concept of evidence is simpler, easier, and quicker to comprehend and that correctly, mine or Iron Woode's?
Dear Iron Woode:
Thanks, first of all, that you recognize me to be not any bot, now to the business of us two concurring on a mutually agreed on concept on what is evidence.
I say:
Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
You say:
Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
Dear readers, I ask you, according to your honest intelligent productive examination, which concept of evidence is simpler, easier, and quicker to comprehend and that correctly, mine or Iron Woode's?
empirical, proof, verified, experimentation.Dear readers and all honest intelligent productive posters here, let us all work as to arrive at a communally agreed on concept of what is evidence, and that concept must apply in all instances where evidence is invoked to prove the existence of something.
Now, in addition, let no one who has some stock knowledge and information for being a literate educated human being i.e. a homo sapiens, search in dictionaries, for that is already evidence to his ignorance of what is evidence.
Wherefore: here are two proposed concepts of evidence:
From Marius
- Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
From Iron Woode
- Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
Don't you all notice that with my definition of evidence, there is no word which any literate educated person has to know the meaning of, whereas with the definition of Iron Woode, the following words might make the readers ask themselves the meanings of: empirical, proof, verified, experimentation.
So, on that consideration I submit my definition of evidence is simpler, easier, and quicker to comprehend than that of Iron Woode.
If anyone does not agree with me, then let him just point out to every reader and every honest intelligent productive poster here, what words they meet in my definition which they have no idea what these words mean.
Dear readers and all honest intelligent productive posters here, let us all work as to arrive at a communally agreed on concept of what is evidence, and that concept must apply in all instances where evidence is invoked to prove the existence of something.
Now, in addition, let no one who has some stock knowledge and information for being a literate educated human being i.e. a homo sapiens, search in dictionaries, for that is already evidence to his ignorance of what is evidence.
Wherefore: here are two proposed concepts of evidence:
From Marius
- Evidence is anything at all existing which brings man to know another thing to be existing. (16 words)
From Iron Woode
- Evidence is empirical proof of something that can be verified by repeatable experimentation.
Don't you all notice that with my definition of evidence, there is no word which any literate educated person has to know the meaning of, whereas with the definition of Iron Woode, the following words might make the readers ask themselves the meanings of: empirical, proof, verified, experimentation.
So, on that consideration I submit my definition of evidence is simpler, easier, and quicker to comprehend than that of Iron Woode.
If anyone does not agree with me, then let him just point out to every reader and every honest intelligent productive poster here, what words they meet in my definition which they have no idea what these words mean.
There is something satisfying about this poster spending countless posts calling others low IQ anti-intellectuals then demanding others accept a definition of evidence because it's easier to understand. This is most religions to a T.
Just because y'all know big words don't make you smart! If'n you were smart, you could explain it in small words!There is something satisfying about this poster spending countless posts calling others low IQ anti-intellectuals then demanding others accept a definition of evidence because it's easier to understand. This is most religions to a T.
There is something satisfying about this poster spending countless posts calling others low IQ anti-intellectuals then demanding others accept a definition of evidence because it's easier to understand. This is most religions to a T.
Just because y'all know big words don't make you smart! If'n you were smart, you could explain it in small words!
(A statement I've actually heard someone say)