From Marius Dejess
Sunday at 5:01 AM #274
Dear readers here and my opponents here:
Today I will tell you when you know already that a poster is cognizant that he has lost in the battle of honest intelligent productive thinking, it is when he starts posting filthy texts in his posts, which filthy texts definitely reflect on his true filthy character - even though erstwhile he was acting as a gentleman intellectual.
Will he change from his now filthy character? That remains to be seen.
For filthy texts, e.g. like this text, "Sure, lets go with the whale fart."
Now dear readers and posters here, beware of filthy posters who have come to cognizance that they have lost in the battle for honest intelligent productive thinking.
Next to filthy posters are nonsense and/or derailing posters, you will see them all the time here in my thread, on the topic:
"The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not."
.
.
ANNEX
[For your orientation]
Title of thread: The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not.
Thread starter: Marius Dejess
Start date: Jun 7, 2016
Post #1
There is endless debate over God existing or not.
But there is no talk at all about how to concur on what it is or how to prove or disprove that something at all exists in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
I think I can and do so prove for myself that God exists, and you can also if you will concur with me on how to prove that something at all exists in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
Here is step No. 1 in proving or disproving that something at all, be it the nose in our face or God existing in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind:
No. 1 Parties engaged in proving or disproving something to exist must first work to concur on the concept of the thing, anything at all be it the nose in our face or God, otherwise it is an insane exchange of thoughts because parties will be talking past each other's head, and that is not communication at all or getting connected at all.
What do you guys here say?
When you accept my step No. 1, then I will or you guys here can propose step No. 2 for us all to work on to concur on it.
.
.
SMOGZINN said:
The are literally infinite. Quantum Flux, a endless cycle of expansion and contraction, intelligent being, a whale fart that traveled backward in time, a golden teapot. I can type anything at all and claim it as an reason for the first cause. That last sentence could have caused the universe. Now this one could.
It is my observation that in almost every reply I write less than you.
Sure, lets go with the whale fart.