Dear readers and posters here, do you notice that Smog has not produced his concept of what is an argument in the least number of words from his own brain tissues?
That is proof from evidence that the man can’t think for himself.
My desire is to probe whether the man can think and write for himself, by himself, through himself, in himself, from himself and for himself, but zero he is all zero.
It is impossible for him to do what the thread is all about, namely:
"The need to concur on HOW TO PROVE God exists or not."
How? By ARGUMENT!*
Read my message and his message below, and see that again he has taken to his gimmick of evasive flight owing to his being frightened to think for himself, how to present his own concept of what is an argument in the least number of words he can master.
Here is my concept of what is an argument in the least number of words that I can master, namely. Argument is “communication to prove something,” (four words).
See! Only four words for my concept of what is argument: “communication to prove something.”
Okay, Smog, see if you can think as to produce your concept of what is argument, in the least number of words you can(?) master.
__________________________
From Marius Yesterday at 1:54 AM #317
Dear Smog, as usual you have nothing of anything at all which you have come to with your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking, but must depend on the thinking of others.
I challenge you before this forum's readers and posters, to produce a concept of what is an argument in the least number of words, that you can master from your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking.
Dear readers and porters, Smog will again go into searching for something in re the word argument: so that he can get it from others what is in the shortest number of words, the concept of the word argument.
If he is not a filthy poster, he is a most miserable no self thinker altogether.
Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.
______________________
From Smog Yesterday at 2:13 AM #319
Marius Dejess said:
Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.
Smog said: (blah blah blah)
I gave you every opportunity to say something. To give an argument or to even engage with me in a discussion. You have done nothing but keep asking for someone else to post something. You are either a bot or a troll, you are certainly not someone that intends to have a honest conversion. If I am wrong about you being nothing more than a bot or troll, tell us something. Don't ask for anything this time, tell us something of your philosophy. Tell us why we should have this conversation. Start the conversation you want to have, instead of asking pointless questions, that have already been answered. If you do nothing but attack me again, you will be ignored as a bot.
(Blah blah blah, nothing of any concept of argument in the least number of words he Smog can(not) master.)
______________________
*Dear Smog, do it now, produce your concept of argument in the least number of words you can master, then we will proceed to work together as to arrive at a mutually agreed on concept of what is an argument, okay?
.