The need to concur on how to prove God exists or not.

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,331
7,986
136
01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101110 01100011 01110101 01110010 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01001111 01010000 00100000 01100101 01111000 01101001 01110011 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00101110
 
  • Love
Reactions: skyking

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
62,678
11,019
136
01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101110 01100011 01110101 01110010 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01001111 01010000 00100000 01100101 01111000 01101001 01110011 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00101110

You mis-spelled 00100000. Should have been 00100010
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,331
7,986
136
You mis-spelled 00100000. Should have been 00100010
01000001 01101000 00100000 01100011 01110010 01100001 01110000 00100001 00100000 01001001 00100111 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100010 01101100 01100001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110000 01100101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100101 01100011 01101011 00100001
 

Marius Dejess

Senior member
Sep 7, 2015
320
34
101
Dear readers and posters here, do you notice that Smog has not produced his concept of what is an argument in the least number of words from his own brain tissues?

That is proof from evidence that the man can’t think for himself.

My desire is to probe whether the man can think and write for himself, by himself, through himself, in himself, from himself and for himself, but zero he is all zero.

It is impossible for him to do what the thread is all about, namely:
"The need to concur on HOW TO PROVE God exists or not."

How? By ARGUMENT!*


Read my message and his message below, and see that again he has taken to his gimmick of evasive flight owing to his being frightened to think for himself, how to present his own concept of what is an argument in the least number of words he can master.

Here is my concept of what is an argument in the least number of words that I can master, namely. Argument is “communication to prove something,” (four words).

See! Only four words for my concept of what is argument: “communication to prove something.”


Okay, Smog, see if you can think as to produce your concept of what is argument, in the least number of words you can(?) master.

__________________________


From Marius Yesterday at 1:54 AM #317
Dear Smog, as usual you have nothing of anything at all which you have come to with your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking, but must depend on the thinking of others.

I challenge you before this forum's readers and posters, to produce a concept of what is an argument in the least number of words, that you can master from your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking.


Dear readers and porters, Smog will again go into searching for something in re the word argument: so that he can get it from others what is in the shortest number of words, the concept of the word argument.

If he is not a filthy poster, he is a most miserable no self thinker altogether.


Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.

______________________

From Smog Yesterday at 2:13 AM #319

Marius Dejess said:
Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.

Smog said: (blah blah blah)
I gave you every opportunity to say something. To give an argument or to even engage with me in a discussion. You have done nothing but keep asking for someone else to post something. You are either a bot or a troll, you are certainly not someone that intends to have a honest conversion. If I am wrong about you being nothing more than a bot or troll, tell us something. Don't ask for anything this time, tell us something of your philosophy. Tell us why we should have this conversation. Start the conversation you want to have, instead of asking pointless questions, that have already been answered. If you do nothing but attack me again, you will be ignored as a bot.

(Blah blah blah, nothing of any concept of argument in the least number of words he Smog can(not) master.)

______________________



*Dear Smog, do it now, produce your concept of argument in the least number of words you can master, then we will proceed to work together as to arrive at a mutually agreed on concept of what is an argument, okay?

.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,331
7,986
136
Dear readers and posters here, do you notice that Smog has not produced his concept of what is an argument in the least number of words from his own brain tissues?

That is proof from evidence that the man can’t think for himself.

My desire is to probe whether the man can think and write for himself, by himself, through himself, in himself, from himself and for himself, but zero he is all zero.

It is impossible for him to do what the thread is all about, namely:
"The need to concur on HOW TO PROVE God exists or not."

How? By ARGUMENT!*


Read my message and his message below, and see that again he has taken to his gimmick of evasive flight owing to his being frightened to think for himself, how to present his own concept of what is an argument in the least number of words he can master.

Here is my concept of what is an argument in the least number of words that I can master, namely. Argument is “communication to prove something,” (four words).

See! Only four words for my concept of what is argument: “communication to prove something.”


Okay, Smog, see if you can think as to produce your concept of what is argument, in the least number of words you can(?) master.

__________________________


From Marius Yesterday at 1:54 AM #317
Dear Smog, as usual you have nothing of anything at all which you have come to with your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking, but must depend on the thinking of others.

I challenge you before this forum's readers and posters, to produce a concept of what is an argument in the least number of words, that you can master from your very own self personal honest intelligent productive thinking.


Dear readers and porters, Smog will again go into searching for something in re the word argument: so that he can get it from others what is in the shortest number of words, the concept of the word argument.

If he is not a filthy poster, he is a most miserable no self thinker altogether.


Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.

______________________

From Smog Yesterday at 2:13 AM #319

Marius Dejess said:
Let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what is the next gimmick of Smog.

Smog said: (blah blah blah)
I gave you every opportunity to say something. To give an argument or to even engage with me in a discussion. You have done nothing but keep asking for someone else to post something. You are either a bot or a troll, you are certainly not someone that intends to have a honest conversion. If I am wrong about you being nothing more than a bot or troll, tell us something. Don't ask for anything this time, tell us something of your philosophy. Tell us why we should have this conversation. Start the conversation you want to have, instead of asking pointless questions, that have already been answered. If you do nothing but attack me again, you will be ignored as a bot.

(Blah blah blah, nothing of any concept of argument in the least number of words he Smog can(not) master.)

______________________



*Dear Smog, do it now, produce your concept of argument in the least number of words you can master, then we will proceed to work together as to arrive at a mutually agreed on concept of what is an argument, okay?

.
01010111 01101000 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101101 01101001 01101110 01101001 01101101 01110101 01101101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01101101 01100010 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01100100 01110011 00111111 00100000 01000001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01010010 01000001 01001101 00111111
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,244
10,748
136
That is proof from evidence that the man can’t think for himself

However at least he actually HAS brain-tissue to think with.

More then this lame script can do.

Oh as for the lame scripts creator ... give it up loser your covers have been yanked.
 
Last edited:

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
30,854
12,353
136
My desire is to probe whether the man can think and write for himself, by himself, through himself, in himself, from himself and for himself, but zero he is all zero.

tenor.gif
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,202
4,401
136
Dear readers and posters here, do you notice that Smog has not produced his concept of what is an argument in the least number of words from his own brain tissues?

You have failed the Turing Test and are now on ignore. You are either a bot, or a human that is not sentient.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
94,663
14,929
126
I have at least posted video evidence of one deity talking about another. I have yet to see any evidence of his god. And my deity is not real. So his god is faker than mine. QED
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,244
10,748
136
Actually after reviewing my last few posts in this thread ... no I really don't.

But okay.