Those against OWS cannot possibly know the mission because you are the target of the mission.
Can you say that again, this time with less Yoda.
Those against OWS cannot possibly know the mission because you are the target of the mission.
OWS kitchen stops serving food and starts serving up delicious irony.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/zuccotti_hell_kitchen_i5biNyYYhpa8MSYIL9xSDL
How dare they? They're withholding food from homeless, starving beggars. They protest the 1%, while becoming their own 1%. Fucking hilarious.
They feel under appreciated? Who cares? They have the means, others have the need. Why aren't they doing their fair share?
"Give the peasants some scraps, we'll go have organic steaks."
Why wouldn't they be thrilled to offer these free meals? Would they rather the homeless starve?
Looks like they even got a little police state instituted. Did they have warrants for all those tents?
And so we all get a glimpse of this fabulous microcosm of a socialist society, in the heart of the financial capital of the world...
He's not "falling for it." He abusing it, intentionally and maliciously. A blind partisan forms his beliefs first, then invents whatever reality he needs to support it. This is especially true when demonizing opponents. No lie is too outrageous because the end justifies his means.
Oh I thought this was pretty ironic as well.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/10/in_downtown_portland_fears_tha.html
Protest corporations
Become a corporation
That might be ironic ... if they were protesting corporations. They aren't. They're protesting corruption. If the allegations discussed in the article are correct, they've now been victimized by a corrupt person who infiltrated Occupy Portland.Oh I thought this was pretty ironic as well.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/10/in_downtown_portland_fears_tha.html
Protest corporations
Become a corporation
That might be ironic ... if they were protesting corporations. They aren't. They're protesting corruption. If the allegations discussed in the article are correct, they've now been victimized by a corrupt person who infiltrated Occupy Portland.
the criminal and professional homeless aren't protesting, are you sure?
Protesters are using resources that are valueable. The more resources misdirected the less time they are able to be out there protesting. Feeding criminals and professional homeless are the foodbanks and food kitchen jobs, not OWS.
Criminals and people which choose to be homeless are not part of the protest, which is the point
You are trying really too hard like Eskimo pointed out earlier. Take a breather once in a while. Go read up on fallacious reasoning. Take this as a teachable.moment to educate yourself. You can't assign bogus characteristics to a group of people then try to tear them down on it. That is a straw man fallacy and you are falling for it in practically every thread in here.
The protest is for the 99%, no? The protest is allegedly not for the police department but every rally I've seen the protesters ask the NYPD to cross the line because they too are the 99%. What's the difference between a cop crossing the line and a homeless guy?
The answer is OWS has no clear agenda. Nobody in OWS can seem to agree what the mission statement is so you just end up with contradictions and confusion.
And you know these freeloaders are criminals and professional homeless, how? These people could legitimately be part of the 99% and could really use some goat cheese.
The protesters aren't eating gourmet meals
Hundreds of grimy protesters laying siege to Wall Street and stuffed into the now-smelly Zuccotti Park dine each night on gourmet meals prepared by a former hotel chef using only the finest organic ingredients.
“We’re running a five-star restaurant down there,’’ crowed Eric Smith, 38, the ex-le Chef de Tournant at the Sheraton in Midtown, who works out of a soup kitchen in East New York, Brooklyn, churning out the meals for more than 1,000 protesters every day.
“The other day, we made some wonderful salmon cakes with dill sauce and some quinoa salad and a wonderful tomato salad with fennel and red onion,’’ he said.
“We use organic, grass-fed meats, and the other day, we made a wonderful fried rice and root vegetables and all kinds of soup.”
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/..._kitchen_PIZ7EsDJEZqzPgzzEWKX7I#ixzz1cI09AWn7
They seem to be eating better than I am. Last night I had a can of soup. They could probably feed more people if they cut back a bit.
The terror of the knowledge of how worthless you feel demands that you look down on others. You are the bottom of human dreg because it's how you feel. Your demented notion that you have achieved something via your own efforts that makes you better than others is a transparency that will fool nobody with real self respect. All those worthless folk you see is who you are. You poor sick monster.
Amen
This certainly has the righties on here in a tight wad :thumbsup:
Now, Dear Moonie, tell me why I hate myself please!
This so-called irony is non-existent. OP is putting words in the OWS-protestors' mouths, and then pretending they're being hypocrites.
OWS is movement is NOT saying "the haves should take care of the have-nots." They're saying, "The top 1% have stacked the economic deck, and the remaining 99% of the population are increasingly suffering; the rules should be changed to reverse this trend."
OP thinks the 99% (as represented by the OWS protestors) should be taking care of the hungry, and that's EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of the OWS message: OWS is saying more of the burden should be shifted AWAY from the 99% and more ONTO the 1%. The right wants to shift more of the burden onto the 99% and away from the 1%, exactly what the OP is advocating.
It's incredibly easy. This protest is not made to feed the homeless of NYC. There are way too many of them to do that, and it's not the right venue.
Similarly to how you can support increased aid to the homeless without housing one of them in your living room, you can be for more equitable distribution of wealth without feeding the homeless population of whatever city you happen to be in as well. What's so hard about that?
This so-called irony is non-existent. OP is putting words in the OWS-protestors' mouths, and then pretending they're being hypocrites.
OWS is movement is NOT saying "the haves should take care of the have-nots." They're saying, "The top 1% have stacked the economic deck, and the remaining 99% of the population are increasingly suffering; the rules should be changed to reverse this trend."
OP thinks the 99% (as represented by the OWS protestors) should be taking care of the hungry, and that's EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of the OWS message: OWS is saying more of the burden should be shifted AWAY from the 99% and more ONTO the 1%. The right wants to shift more of the burden onto the 99% and away from the 1%, exactly what the OP is advocating.
So basically a NIMBY situation....
Now they don't even want to share the park with the homeless.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...laza-article-1.969320?localLinksEnabled=false
You republicans sure spend a lot of time trying to find ways to discredit this group as a whole. I dont think ive ever seen anything like it.
Not a Republican, conservative, or otherwise. Just a guy with a distaste for idiots who think they're revolutionists when they can't even figure out what they stand for.
I pointed that out in the main OWS thread too. He's awfully obsessed with a movement he claims doesn't matter.You republicans sure spend a lot of time trying to find ways to discredit this group as a whole. I dont think ive ever seen anything like it.
