Excellent statistics. The thing is how badly some people can identify the remedy.
The progressives have long been the only political force with the answers to these issues.
They're the ones discussing things like Thom Hartmann's "Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class -- And What We Can Do About It":
Beginning with the Reagan administration, the U.S. government has steadily instituted policies and legislation that favor corporations over citizens, argues Air America host Hartmann (The Ultimate Sacrifice). Analyzing the rhetoric and policies of the current administration's "compassionate conservatism," Hartmann goes on to detail the ways in which safety nets for working people (from progressive taxation to antitrust legislation to Social Security) have been steadily weakened, and argues that an empowered, educated middle class is crucial to a functioning democracy. Chapters detail the ways in which what gets called "the free market" is not really free (for good reason, he notes), how "We the People create the middle class," how the policies of the Founding Fathers and figures like FDR still have a lot to teach us, and ways for "Leveling the Playing Field."
And dozens of similar books.
In the meantime, the right has offered things like Tom Friedman's worshipful books praising globalism - which have some truth, but as I've long said, support raw globalism that screws the American middle class, rather than a planned globalism which combines benefits of globalism with protections for the middle class.
We have a lot of America duped into supporting the wrong side. It's one thing to point out there are problems, but that becomes obvious. Then the issue is the side to take.
Everyone claims to want a strong middle class, but the sides have contradictory policies, some of which help and some of which damage.
But there's a clue - the side that is *fixated* on the poor getting anything, which is such a tiny bit of the economy, should notice how it is so fixated on a small part.