The mess in Texas.

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/07/opinion/07krugman.html?_r=1&hp

The Texas Omen

By PAUL KRUGMAN


These are tough times for state governments. Huge deficits loom almost everywhere, from California to New York, from New Jersey to Texas.

Wait — Texas? Wasn’t Texas supposed to be thriving even as the rest of America suffered? Didn’t its governor declare, during his re-election campaign, that “we have billions in surplus”? Yes, it was, and yes, he did. But reality has now intruded, in the form of a deficit expected to run as high as $25 billion over the next two years.

And that reality has implications for the nation as a whole. For Texas is where the modern conservative theory of budgeting — the belief that you should never raise taxes under any circumstances, that you can always balance the budget by cutting wasteful spending — has been implemented most completely. If the theory can’t make it there, it can’t make it anywhere.

How bad is the Texas deficit? Comparing budget crises among states is tricky, for technical reasons. Still, data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities suggest that the Texas budget gap is worse than New York’s, about as bad as California’s, but not quite up to New Jersey levels.

The point, however, is that just the other day Texas was being touted as a role model (and still is by commentators who haven’t been keeping up with the news). It was the state the recession supposedly passed by, thanks to its low taxes and business-friendly policies. Its governor boasted that its budget was in good shape thanks to his “tough conservative decisions.”

Oh, and at a time when there’s a full-court press on to demonize public-sector unions as the source of all our woes, Texas is nearly demon-free: less than 20 percent of public-sector workers there are covered by union contracts, compared with almost 75 percent in New York.

So what happened to the “Texas miracle” many people were talking about even a few months ago?

Part of the answer is that reports of a recession-proof state were greatly exaggerated. It’s true that Texas job losses haven’t been as severe as those in the nation as a whole since the recession began in 2007. But Texas has a rapidly growing population — largely, suggests Harvard’s Edward Glaeser, because its liberal land-use and zoning policies have kept housing cheap. There’s nothing wrong with that; but given that rising population, Texas needs to create jobs more rapidly than the rest of the country just to keep up with a growing work force.

And when you look at unemployment, Texas doesn’t seem particularly special: its unemployment rate is below the national average, thanks in part to high oil prices, but it’s about the same as the unemployment rate in New York or Massachusetts.

What about the budget? The truth is that the Texas state government has relied for years on smoke and mirrors to create the illusion of sound finances in the face of a serious “structural” budget deficit — that is, a deficit that persists even when the economy is doing well. When the recession struck, hitting revenue in Texas just as it did everywhere else, that illusion was bound to collapse.

The only thing that let Gov. Rick Perry get away, temporarily, with claims of a surplus was the fact that Texas enacts budgets only once every two years, and the last budget was put in place before the depth of the economic downturn was clear. Now the next budget must be passed — and Texas may have a $25 billion hole to fill. Now what?

Given the complete dominance of conservative ideology in Texas politics, tax increases are out of the question. So it has to be spending cuts.

Yet Mr. Perry wasn’t lying about those “tough conservative decisions”: Texas has indeed taken a hard, you might say brutal, line toward its most vulnerable citizens. Among the states, Texas ranks near the bottom in education spending per pupil, while leading the nation in the percentage of residents without health insurance. It’s hard to imagine what will happen if the state tries to eliminate its huge deficit purely through further cuts.

I don’t know how the mess in Texas will end up being resolved. But the signs don’t look good, either for the state or for the nation.

Right now, triumphant conservatives in Washington are declaring that they can cut taxes and still balance the budget by slashing spending. Yet they haven’t been able to do that even in Texas, which is willing both to impose great pain (by its stinginess on health care) and to shortchange the future (by neglecting education). How are they supposed to pull it off nationally, especially when the incoming Republicans have declared Medicare, Social Security and defense off limits?

People used to say that the future happens first in California, but these days what happens in Texas is probably a better omen. And what we’re seeing right now is a future that doesn’t work.



Cliffs:

Texas faces huge deficits.

The "conservative" fiscal policies of Texas have resulted in the same problems as states like New York, California and New Jersey.

Texas has the same unemployment rate as New York and Massachusettes.

Texas spends the least on student education and leads the nation in having the LEAST amount of people with health insurance.

The serious problems in Texas are only now coming to light because Texas has a two year budget and only now is the recession being factored in.




Well, I guess its time to mess with Texas!
 
Last edited:

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
has there ever been any rigorous showing that money spent = classroom performance? i'm pretty sure there hasn't. nice how the NYT assumes that low spending per student necessarily means the education system sucks. when the opposite certainly hasn't been true.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
The schools my children attend requested printer paper, art supplies, hand sanitizer, tissues as well as other common needed items be brought by the students at the start of the school year.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
If they have a 12.5 Billion\year deficit then they clearly havent implemented fiscal conservatism enough. There is 12.5 billion worth of cuts to be made. And what is a "modern conservatism budget" theory? Balancing a budget is common sense and has been since the advent of budgets. What a stupid article.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
If Texas had the income tax that Hawaii does, they'd probably have a real surplus.... and I wouldn't be able to afford to live there either. But Texas does have very high property taxes-- about 2-3% depending on the municipality.
 
Last edited:

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=711

Any way you look at the figures, Texas looks a lot better than California, and most other states for that matter.

Take into consideration that Texas is in this position despite making significantly fewer cutbacks than other states, as well as having no income tax.

Texas also received and used significantly less federal stimulus money in plugging budget holes in the past. California, as well as many other states, enacted budgets based on their assumption that they'd receive certain federal stimulus dollars, and instead of enacting cuts, they spent the money unwisely, and are now having to rewrite budgets to avoid massive shortfalls.

Indiana, on the other hand, has aggressively cut spending and relied on reserves to avoid tax increases, and did not budget any "expected" federal dollars for the next FY.

Point being, CA's problems are far deeper than those of TX and IN, and even when the economy eventually recovers to pre-recession levels, I am pretty confident that states like TX and IN are going to be in much better positions and not facing the problems that CA will continue to face for years to come.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
has there ever been any rigorous showing that money spent = classroom performance? i'm pretty sure there hasn't. nice how the NYT assumes that low spending per student necessarily means the education system sucks. when the opposite certainly hasn't been true.

this.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
The schools my children attend requested printer paper, art supplies, hand sanitizer, tissues as well as other common needed items be brought by the students at the start of the school year.

Cheaper than raising taxes, then sending those dollars through layers of bureaucracy in order to buy those supplies.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=711

Any way you look at the figures, Texas looks a lot better than California, and most other states for that matter.

Take into consideration that Texas is in this position despite making significantly fewer cutbacks than other states, as well as having no income tax.

Texas also received and used significantly less federal stimulus money in plugging budget holes in the past. California, as well as many other states, enacted budgets based on their assumption that they'd receive certain federal stimulus dollars, and instead of enacting cuts, they spent the money unwisely, and are now having to rewrite budgets to avoid massive shortfalls.

Indiana, on the other hand, has aggressively cut spending and relied on reserves to avoid tax increases, and did not budget any "expected" federal dollars for the next FY.

Point being, CA's problems are far deeper than those of TX and IN, and even when the economy eventually recovers to pre-recession levels, I am pretty confident that states like TX and IN are going to be in much better positions and not facing the problems that CA will continue to face for years to come.

this too.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
If Texas had the income tax that Hawaii does, they'd probably have a real surplus.... and I wouldn't be able to afford to live there either. But Texas does have very high property taxes-- about 2-3% depending on the municipality.
Texas doesn't have an equivalent CA Prop 13 yet their residents don't suffer being taxed out of their homes?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
The Texas legislature only meets every two years for about 8 months or so. So the budget for 2011 was devised in 2009 based on expected sales tax revenue. What no one saw was 14 months of declining sales tax revenue thanks to a declining economy. Additionally, our property taxes have decreased the last two years based, again, on projected revenue streams that haven't come about. So, yes, there is a projected budget deficit ($18 to $25B) for 2012 but that is because the revenue projections were done back in 2009. When the legislature comes back this year, they will do what they always do, cut back on spending (3-5%), raise the property tax rates (which they've already said they would do), maybe dip into the state's rainy day fund (which has $8B in it), raise some fees and close the gap.

As the economy gets back on track (which it will like any other cycle) revenues will again rise, we will be in a surplus and Californians and New Yorkers will once again be jealous as they're looking up from the bottom of their hole.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Nick has a great point. 3 is a bigger number than 1!

Republicans and Democrats both can't govern. Neither party can run a state, let alone a country. Everything they touch gets fucked up. I can see it. senseamp and his buddies only think its the Republicans.
 

ConstipatedVigilante

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2006
7,670
1
0
The schools my children attend requested printer paper, art supplies, hand sanitizer, tissues as well as other common needed items be brought by the students at the start of the school year.

My parents supplied all of that stuff while I was in school. I thought it was the norm. Those things are included in other schools' budgets?