shira
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2005
- 9,500
- 6
- 81
Ironic, isn't it, that in the same paragraph that you "defend" free speech you tell me to STFU? You're such a moron that you can't even keep a consistent thought in your head from one sentence to the next.why are you trying to restrict speech? This was already covered by the supreme court so STFU and move on.
you on the left are so full of it. A law that requires someone to register to collect petitions = bad. Someone spending their money on politics = bad.
PS heres a billionaire going to spend hundreds of millions to elect members of the church of man made global warming.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/18/e...edges-to-spend-100-million-in-2014-elections/
Are you on the left going to go all nutter against him? Or now that he supports your side its ok.
Edit,
If you have such a problem with secrecy, you must hate buffet:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/05/13/warren-buffet-donates-12-billion-to-abortion-groups/
Who funnels over a billion dollars to various abortion groups, many who do campaigning.
Furthermore, mandatory reporting requirements by groups receiving contributions from big donors hasn't been addressed by the SCOTUS for the very simple reason that there's currently no such law on the books. So "this" has NOT "already been covered by the supreme court," and Congress is free to pass such laws. But of course the right continually blocks passage of sunshine laws because they would make it easier to determine the motivation behind the right-wing propaganda being fed to the American people.
