The Koch Brothers and George Soros

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
why are you trying to restrict speech? This was already covered by the supreme court so STFU and move on.


you on the left are so full of it. A law that requires someone to register to collect petitions = bad. Someone spending their money on politics = bad.


PS heres a billionaire going to spend hundreds of millions to elect members of the church of man made global warming.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/18/e...edges-to-spend-100-million-in-2014-elections/

Are you on the left going to go all nutter against him? Or now that he supports your side its ok.

Edit,

If you have such a problem with secrecy, you must hate buffet:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/05/13/warren-buffet-donates-12-billion-to-abortion-groups/

Who funnels over a billion dollars to various abortion groups, many who do campaigning.
Ironic, isn't it, that in the same paragraph that you "defend" free speech you tell me to STFU? You're such a moron that you can't even keep a consistent thought in your head from one sentence to the next.

Furthermore, mandatory reporting requirements by groups receiving contributions from big donors hasn't been addressed by the SCOTUS for the very simple reason that there's currently no such law on the books. So "this" has NOT "already been covered by the supreme court," and Congress is free to pass such laws. But of course the right continually blocks passage of sunshine laws because they would make it easier to determine the motivation behind the right-wing propaganda being fed to the American people.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
How I miss the Good'ol days when the young Earth had ten million year long ice ages covering the world in ice (oceans froze to the bottom) pole to pole.
How? A calculation of the early Sun's output, Earth's orbit and the likely "Life Zone" at the time.
Climate Science got its real start in the 80's when computers grew fast enough for the task. What science does show is temperature increase follows Mankind's use of fossil fuels and release of CO2.

What was the topic about?
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Ironic, isn't it, that in the same paragraph that you "defend" free speech you tell me to STFU? .
.

nelson-haha.jpg
 

Stewox

Senior member
Dec 10, 2013
528
0
0
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/28...cking-movie-financed-by-oil-rich-arab-nation/

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...ome-temps-week-broke-every-record-s-ever-been

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/23/President-Obama-I-Look-Like-Morgan-Freeman

Temperatures rise = Global Warming
Temperatures lower = Global Warming
Climate gets wet = Global Warming
Climate gets dry = Global Warming
More hurricanes = Global Warming
Fewer hurricanes = Global Warming
Milder winters = Global Warming
Harsher winters = Global Warming
Hotter summers = Global Warming
Cooler summers = Global Warming
Car breaks down = Global Warming
Cat gets pregnant = Global Warming
...and on and on.

Global Warming (previously known as Global Cooling and occasionally known as Climate Change, Extreme Weather, and other euphemisms) is a religion. And like a religion, it's full of arbitrary, contradictory, self-affirming, shifting, and incoherent claims asserted as unassailable truth (immediately dropped the moment another becomes more advantageous) that literally anything can be true, for any reason, from any person, at any time.

The biggest hoax on the planet.


Also, dirty harry reid http://www.infowars.com/breaking-sen-harry-reid-behind-blm-land-grab-of-bundy-ranch/