• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Jussie Smollett Affair

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
And link my posts where I’ve said over and over it was a figure of speech meaning this crap happens all the time. And I’ve shown that to be true. Y’all know I’m right so argue something ridiculous as a way to save face. Just admit I’m right and it happens frequently. Or argue about statistics and “well acktuwallys” if you want but it just makes you look ridiculous.

No, sorry, "Happens frequently" is a totally relative term and you haven't proven any such thing.

You're using ill-defined words rather than numbers to stake out your position on this. Highly convenient since no one can prove that something does or does not "happen frequently" without any definition or baseline to compare it to. Which makes what you're saying unfalsifiable. Also meaningless.

And by the way, if "90% of the time" was a "figure of speech," then I get a freebie as well. So was "arm's length list."
 
Do you just follow him around to comment on his posts?

Here are you last 15 posts. 5 of those are for Ugly. So 33% of your last 15 posts are to him. Further, there is nothing there other than a single line for 14 of those posts.

Truly pathetic.
You dumb. Sad.
Do you hate Winston Churchill as well?
And bigoted jackass number 2 shows up.
Jackass
Israel has to exist in order for the end times to happen. + Link
And apparently it makes you feel all warm and tingly.
ROFL
She's one of my favorite American political cartoonists.
Prove it.
That puddle of drool just keeps growing.
It's been pointed out several times and he obviously doesn't care.
He's a troll looking for a reaction. <shrug>
He seems to be one of those incredibly ignorant 'burn it all down' kinda guys.
History provides many good lessons. Humans tend not to pay attention though.

Update: you can add

bullshit.

to your list.

I think someone doesn't like UC too much.
 
I think UC is positioning himself for a win-win. If Jussie made up even a part of it he will be like...

"I told you black people make this stuff"

If it turns out true as he described, UC will be like...

"Well I never said he was lying and black people make up enough other stuff"
 
I think UC is positioning himself for a win-win. If Jussie made up even a part of it he will be like...

"I told you black people make this stuff"

If it turns out true as he described, UC will be like...

"Well I never said he was lying and black people make up enough other stuff"

Lol your defense of the situation instead of acceptance is just fucking hilarious you dumb fuck little twit. Show your ignorance more you fool.

God forbid you show a little bit of rational reasoning. But we can't have that now can we?
 
Lol your defense of the situation instead of acceptance is just fucking hilarious you dumb fuck little twit. Show your ignorance more you fool.

God forbid you show a little bit of rational reasoning. But we can't have that now can we?
I'm choosing to believe Jussie until facts show otherwise. I know you are another one who is praying for him to have made it up just so you can get a talking point.

There's nothing to accept until the investigation is over.
 
Lol your defense of the situation instead of acceptance is just fucking hilarious you dumb fuck little twit. Show your ignorance more you fool.

God forbid you show a little bit of rational reasoning. But we can't have that now can we?
You're awfully emotional for someone supposedly so rational.
 
Update: you can add



to your list.

I think someone doesn't like UC too much.

I find it so pathetic yet funny he is posting to him knowing he is blocked. He knows he went see them. He is yelling at a fucking nothing. Haha how useless. I could see if he did not know, but how hollow must you be to do it over and over knowing he won't see them. My God it's so funny. Lol.
 
I find it so pathetic yet funny he is posting to him knowing he is blocked. He knows he went see them. He is yelling at a fucking nothing. Haha how useless. I could see if he did not know, but how hollow must you be to do it over and over knowing he won't see them. My God it's so funny. Lol.

There are certain individuals on this forum that I can easily equate their IQ based on the number of characters in their average post.

It's like they are on Twatter and can't dare to post more than 140 characters.
 
There are certain individuals on this forum that I can easily equate their IQ based on the number of characters in their average post.

It's like they are on Twatter and can't dare to post more than 140 characters.
This post barely exceeded 140 characters. Just sayin'
 
Guy, he has you blocked and apparently you know this. It's fucking hilarious that you post one liners to him knowing he can't see them. But hey, you do you old man.

I don't believe in 'blocking'. Never have, never will.

If there's something I don't wish to read, there's this thing called "scrolling" that you can do with your mouse.

If a person makes a post in a public forum that I feel like addressing in some way, I do so. It's their issue as to whether or not they see it, not mine. <shrug>

And this amuses you? Weird.
 
I find it so pathetic yet funny he is posting to him knowing he is blocked. He knows he went see them. He is yelling at a fucking nothing. Haha how useless. I could see if he did not know, but how hollow must you be to do it over and over knowing he won't see them. My God it's so funny. Lol.

You do realize that everyone on the forum can see his replies even if UC cannot, right? Has it occurred to you that he doesn't care if UC reads them or not?
 
I don't believe in 'blocking'. Never have, never will.

If there's something I don't wish to read, there's this thing called "scrolling" that you can do with your mouse.

If a person makes a post in a public forum that I feel like addressing in some way, I do so. It's their issue as to whether or not they see it, not mine. <shrug>

And this amuses you? Weird.

None of that is relevant to what I said. You are talking to a person that came hear you. You are addressing nothing. Do you also have dinner parties of one?
 
You do realize that everyone on the forum can see his replies even if UC cannot, right? Has it occurred to you that he doesn't care if UC reads them or not?

Yep, that is why I said he is doing it for others. That is part of what I find funny. His comments on Ugly's posts are funny because of what they are and the implications.

It's the equivalent of seeing a picture of a cute dog, and, saying to yourself, "I need to leave a note for others so they know I thought the did was cute. So you leave a note that said "cute dog" stuck to the picture. It's so stupid and pointless. Then, imagine if that made up 33% of your writing.
 
What they’re conveniently leaving out was the plethora of posts I’ve made clarifying that I meant as a figure of speech since everyone here is statisticians that takes everything literally. Point of the post is thisnhappens a lot. But they don’t want to argue the point of the post because it’s true, this happens a lot. Instead they try to pick apart little gotchas in there to save face.
Bullshit.

He said this immediately after the "90%" quote:

90% figure is out of my ass but I’ll fibd examples when I get off work. This stuff happens all the time.

Then people in the thread went on and on asking him to prove 90%. Seems they completely missed the next post he made right after.
 
No, sorry, "Happens frequently" is a totally relative term and you haven't proven any such thing.

You're using ill-defined words rather than numbers to stake out your position on this. Highly convenient since no one can prove that something does or does not "happen frequently" without any definition or baseline to compare it to. Which makes what you're saying unfalsifiable. Also meaningless.

And by the way, if "90% of the time" was a "figure of speech," then I get a freebie as well. So was "arm's length list."
So now "all the time" or "more often than most people realize" is taboo. I guess he was right to throw out an obviously made-up number. Just can't win.
 
I had like 50 new posts when I clicked on this thread right now and all of them but 1 were a buncha fucking douchebags trying to one up each other and 1 who is the biggest of them all who responds constantly to someone he knows has him ignored, with posts that have no substance just being a complete tool.

Anyways, thanks @MomentsofSanity for at least making it worthwhile to click on this thread to see an update.
 
Back
Top