Originally posted by: Literati
Originally posted by: fs5
it's flash 8, and it's nike. A multi-billion dollar company.
I'm sure it didn't cost more than 20 bucks.
I disagree.
Anyone else have an idea?
It's flashy (no pun intended

) and pretty, but the problem with flash-only sites is that they break some of the basic principles of web interfaces that all web users are familiar with.
For instance, most users expect to be able to hit the back button and return to the page they last visited. This doesn't work on a flash-only site.
Good user interfaces should reuse interface controls that the user knows and is comfortable with. That's why Windows applications generally reuse the same Microsoft common controls; if I need to save a file, I'm immediately familiar with the dialog window regardless of the application I'm using. Web sites are no different, and it's best to work with the familiar concepts of HTML and browser navigation rather than to try and subvert them.