The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

[JEDIYoda]

Guys! Guys! You don’t understand, the issue isn’t whether or not an incident happened but whether or not democrats are held to the standards Starbucks has created for them. It doesn’t matter that Starbuck is holding democrats to a standard they never created, all that matters is we hold them to his standards. Otherwise how can he “both sides” this bitch?

Were you being nasty ? She said he penetrated her front side, she never mentioned anything about the pother side.......

 

[sandorski]

Shame on you. You should apologize.

You won’t, but you should.

For what?

 

[Starbuck1975]

You should be ashamed and you should apologize. You won’t, but you should.

Why would I apologize for Democrat hypocrisy? You shouldn’t carry water for them, yet you do.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Lol

You are like an articulate version of IJSSTG, your whole schtick is, “democrats are stupid phucktards!!” Only you use more words.

You remind me of another poster as well, werepossum, whose view of progressive democrats, was like yours, entirely made up in order to fit a narrative. Your last straw man/post was indicative of that.

You remind me of a more articulate version of the passive aggressive waterboy peanut gallery.

 

[fskimospy]

Why would I apologize for Democrat hypocrisy? You shouldn’t carry water for them, yet you do.

Because even after it appears an allegation is false you kept running with it because you care about concern trolling more than the truth.

Absolutely shameful. Again, you owe everyone an apology for your behavior. I mean how shitty does someone have to be to continue to amplify a non-credible rape allegation just to troll people because you think they made a bad statement? Serious question - just how huge of a piece of shit does someone need to be to do that?

 

[brycejones]

For what?

Your behavior in this thread. Starbuck liking your posts should clue you in a bit.

 

[fskimospy]

For what?

For amplifying a non-credible accusation and then calling the people who pointed out the holes in it rape apologists.

 

[Greenman]

You’re concern trolling for a liar. I guess you have to live with that. I was hoping you were adult enough to apologize but apparently not.

Concern trolling, yet another label of the left used in an attempt to discredit opposition without having to defend a position. When can we expect you to whip out the single most feared term in debate, the unbeatable "double dog dare"?

 

[sandorski]

For amplifying a non-credible accusation and then calling the people who pointed out the holes in it rape apologists.

First, the allegation has not been disproved. If it ever gets disproved I will admit I was wrong. I won't be apologizing though.

Secondly, you keep mischaracterizing what I said. In contrast more than 1 person has called me a Liar, a Troll, and implied other overused terms.

 

[fskimospy]

Concern trolling, yet another label of the left used in an attempt to discredit opposition without having to defend a position. When can we expect you to whip out the single most feared term in debate, the unbeatable "double dog dare"?

In case you haven’t read the thread (or even any meaningful part of it) I’ve very clearly defended my position. You have it precisely backwards - concern trolling is what someone does when they can’t defend their position. After all, if they could they would just attack Biden directly and say they think he is a rapist. It’s exactly because their position is so weak they have to pretend to be concerned about something else.

It is now abundantly clear that Tara Reade is a lifelong liar. If people want to say they believe her anyway then just own it.

 

[dank69]

First, the allegation has not been disproved. If it ever gets disproved I will admit I was wrong. I won't be apologizing though.

Secondly, you keep mischaracterizing what I said. In contrast more than 1 person has called me a Liar, a Troll, and implied other overused terms.

You'll apologize when someone proves a negative?

 

[fskimospy]

First, the allegation has not been disproved. If it ever gets disproved I will admit I was wrong. I won't be apologizing though.

You can’t prove a negative so this will almost certainly never be disproved. What we have learned though is that Tara Reade has provably lied about numerous other aspects of her life. Since the entirety of her allegation relies on her personal credibility this destroys her position.

If someone is shown to lie about so much else in their life then there is no rational reason to believe them in a case that relies 100% on their credibility.

Secondly, you keep mischaracterizing what I said. In contrast more than 1 person has called me a Liar, a Troll, and implied other overused terms.

I don’t care what other people called you, that doesn’t excuse your actions. You called me all sorts of crazy names for telling you she was shady and lo and behold I was right. You should take responsibility for that.

 

[sandorski]

You'll apologize when someone proves a negative?

No.

 

[sandorski]

You can’t prove a negative so this will almost certainly never be disproved. What we have learned though is that Tara Reade has provably lied about numerous other aspects of her life. Since the entirety of her allegation relies on her personal credibility this destroys her position.

If someone is shown to lie about so much else in their life then there is no rational reason to believe them in a case that relies 100% on their credibility.


I don’t care what other people called you, that doesn’t excuse your actions. You called me all sorts of crazy names for telling you she was shady and lo and behold I was right. You should take responsibility for that.

This is all off topic to the discussion. I have stated why I won't be apologizing and I won't be. End of discussion.

 

[Jhhnn]

First, the allegation has not been disproved. If it ever gets disproved I will admit I was wrong. I won't be apologizing though.

Secondly, you keep mischaracterizing what I said. In contrast more than 1 person has called me a Liar, a Troll, and implied other overused terms.

You've been all of those things, or just a chump suffering from highly motivated reasoning. Pick it.

 

[fskimospy]

This is all off topic to the discussion. I have stated why I won't be apologizing and I won't be. End of discussion.

I know you won’t be, but you should. Same with Starbuck. I am nearly certain we will never get an apology out of him either, but his behavior was disgraceful.

 

[shortylickens]

I APOLOGIZE FOR RAPING JOE BIDEN!!

 

[Starbuck1975]

And, uhh, what about Tara's bogus story? I thought it was cute the way you pretended to actually believe her & defended her mendacity. Plus your demand that anybody should apologize to her is pure chutzpah.

And now with extra whataboutism over Michael Avenatti? Utterly shameless.

I anticipated you would respond, and this is precisely what I thought you would say.

 

[Starbuck1975]

I know you won’t be, but you should. Same with Starbuck. I am nearly certain we will never get an apology out of him either, but his behavior was disgraceful.

I apologize for disagreeing with you

 

[interchange]

A long time ago I watched an episode of Judge Mathis where one person sued another for harassment and the counter-sued for harassment.

The end went something like this: "I find that y'all have been harassing each other. Cases dismissed."

 

[fskimospy]

I apologize for disagreeing with you

Lol. Just as I predicted.

 

[ivwshane]

You remind me of a more articulate version of the passive aggressive waterboy peanut gallery.

Edgy

 

[theeedude]

The media should apologize to Joe Biden for helping this lying woman smear him.

 

[ivwshane]

The media should apologize to Joe Biden for helping this lying woman smear him.

No, for the most part the “media” did its job and properly vetted her and her claims. Fox News on the other hand...

 

[Starbuck1975]

No, for the most part the “media” did its job and properly vetted her and her claims. Fox News on the other hand...

And by vetting her claim, you mean exhaustively investigating aspects of her life unrelated to her claim