The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

[theeedude]

If the crime scene never existed, the crime never happened.
The End.

 

[eelw]

Yeah odd how she chose to say it happen in the hallway. She must have been alone before in his office. Far more likely situation that the halls of Congress. Well wait for her to change her story and say that she was so emotionally scarred, that she mixed up the location of the abuse.

 

[fskimospy]

So now it appears Tara Reade lied about her attendance and visiting professorship at a university.

Tara Reade: A complicated life and conflicting accounts muddle efforts to understand allegation against Joe Biden | CNN Politics

As Tara Reade was leaving her job at Joe Biden’s Senate office in 1993, she told a close colleague that she believed she was being let go for an unfair reason – that she was being terminated because of a medical issue she had been dealing with.

amp.cnn.com

Reade told CNN that she received a bachelor of arts degree from Antioch University in Seattle under the auspices of a "protected program," personally working with the former president of the school to ensure her identity was protected while she obtained credits for her degree. She also said that she was a visiting professor at the school, on and off for five years.

Presented with this, Karen Hamilton, an Antioch University spokesperson, told CNN that "Alexandra McCabe attended but did not graduate from Antioch University. She was never a faculty member. She did provide several hours of administrative work."

An Antioch University official told CNN that such a "protected program" does not exist and never has.

Sandorski, Starbuck, you guys should seriously apologize.

 

[TheVrolok]

So now it appears Tara Reade lied about her attendance and visiting professorship at a university.

Tara Reade: A complicated life and conflicting accounts muddle efforts to understand allegation against Joe Biden | CNN Politics

As Tara Reade was leaving her job at Joe Biden’s Senate office in 1993, she told a close colleague that she believed she was being let go for an unfair reason – that she was being terminated because of a medical issue she had been dealing with.

amp.cnn.com

Sandorski, Starbuck, you guys should seriously apologize.

Look eski, just because she's a habitual liar and has, in the past, committed fraud, doesn't mean she's not totally being honest about the version of her story she's telling now.

 

[interchange]

Look eski, just because she's a habitual liar and has, in the past, committed fraud, doesn't mean she's not totally being honest about the version of her story she's telling now.

Yeah, seriously! And because we can't explicitly disprove this version of her story then we must believe her because Biden once said we should believe women!

 

[Starbuck1975]

So now it appears Tara Reade lied about her attendance and visiting professorship at a university.

Tara Reade: A complicated life and conflicting accounts muddle efforts to understand allegation against Joe Biden | CNN Politics

As Tara Reade was leaving her job at Joe Biden’s Senate office in 1993, she told a close colleague that she believed she was being let go for an unfair reason – that she was being terminated because of a medical issue she had been dealing with.

amp.cnn.com

Sandorski, Starbuck, you guys should seriously apologize.

Again, why would we apologize for holding Democrats to the standard they advocated for. There is not a prerequisite that an accuser be sympathetic or even a good person. There are a few good articles out from the Atlantic, New Yorker and other reputable publications that understand this distinction.

Her erratic behavior is actually fairly characteristic of a victim.

 

[fskimospy]

Again, why would we apologize for holding Democrats to the standard they advocated for. There is not a prerequisite that an accuser be sympathetic or even a good person. There are a few good articles out from the Atlantic, New Yorker and other reputable publications that understand this distinction.

Her erratic behavior is actually fairly characteristic of a victim.

Lying about graduating from a university, the program she entered under, and a visiting professorship is characteristic of a victim?

You’re too dug in to apologize now but you should. This whole thread goes down with the Kavanaugh thread where you fought to the death to be on the wrong side of sexual assault victims.

 

[ivwshane]

Guys! Guys! You don’t understand, the issue isn’t whether or not an incident happened but whether or not democrats are held to the standards Starbucks has created for them. It doesn’t matter that Starbuck is holding democrats to a standard they never created, all that matters is we hold them to his standards. Otherwise how can he “both sides” this bitch?

 

[fskimospy]

Guys! Guys! You don’t understand, the issue isn’t whether or not an incident happened but whether or not democrats are held to the standards Starbucks has created for them. It doesn’t matter that Starbuck is holding democrats to a standard they never created, all that matters is we hold them to his standards. Otherwise how can he “both sides” this bitch?

You would think at some point the fact that Biden’s accuser was an obvious liar would become an issue for Starbuck.

You would be wrong. All he cares about is the concern trolling.

 

[Jhhnn]

Guys! Guys! You don’t understand, the issue isn’t whether or not an incident happened but whether or not democrats are held to the standards Starbucks has created for them. It doesn’t matter that Starbuck is holding democrats to a standard they never created, all that matters is we hold them to his standards. Otherwise how can he “both sides” this bitch?

You said it better than what I could come up with.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Lying about graduating from a university, the program she entered under, and a visiting professorship is characteristic of a victim?

You’re too dug in to apologize now but you should. This whole thread goes down with the Kavanaugh thread where you fought to the death to be on the wrong side of sexual assault victims.

The only person deserving of an apology is Reade. Outside of the Democrat echo chamber, the hypocrisy and double standard is obvious for all to see. I wouldn’t expect you to acknowledge it.

 

[fskimospy]

The only person deserving of an apology is Reade. Outside of the Democrat echo chamber, the hypocrisy and double standard is obvious for all to see. I wouldn’t expect you to acknowledge it.

Like I said, you’re willing to die on the hill of a liar. Ironically, you were willing to die on the hill of a different liar with Kavanaugh.

If you had a sense of shame you would apologize. I know you won’t so I’ll leave it at this: we both know Reade’s credibility is demolished, you just can’t admit it.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Like I said, you’re willing to die on the hill of a liar. Ironically, you were willing to die on the hill of a different liar with Kavanaugh.

If you had a sense of shame you would apologize. I know you won’t so I’ll leave it at this: we both know Reade’s credibility is demolished, you just can’t admit it.

As always I appreciate your concern and am quite flattered that you insist on making your hypocrisy about me.

The Democrats, so desperate to stop a SCOTUS nomination, that they shoved an accuser who wished to remain anonymous into the public eye, and then rushed to embrace a grifter porn star lawyer in their failed attempt to establish a pattern of behavior that never solidified.

Fast forward two years, and the Democrats move the goal posts once their candidate is held to the same standard they advocated for, and then proceed to use the same shameful playbook to smear the accuser, similarly leveraged against other women like Paula Jones and Anita Hill.

The Democrats are the ones who chose to opportunistically politicize #metoo. Full stop.

It is clear to me who is on the wrong side of this issue, but I can’t stop you from carrying water for hypocrites.

 

[fskimospy]

As always I appreciate your concern and am quite flattered that you insist on making your hypocrisy about me.

The Democrats, so desperate to stop a SCOTUS nomination, that they shoved an accuser who wished to remain anonymous into the public eye, and then rushed to embrace a grifter porn star lawyer in their failed attempt to establish a pattern of behavior that never solidified.

Fast forward two years, and the Democrats move the goal posts once their candidate is held to the same standard they advocated for, and then proceed to use the same shameful playbook to smear the accuser, similarly leveraged against other women like Paula Jones and Anita Hill.

The Democrats are the ones who chose to opportunistically politicize #metoo. Full stop.

It is clear to me who is on the wrong side of this issue, but I can’t stop you from carrying water for hypocrites.

You’re concern trolling for a liar. I guess you have to live with that. I was hoping you were adult enough to apologize but apparently not.

 

[sandorski]

So now it appears Tara Reade lied about her attendance and visiting professorship at a university.

Tara Reade: A complicated life and conflicting accounts muddle efforts to understand allegation against Joe Biden | CNN Politics

As Tara Reade was leaving her job at Joe Biden’s Senate office in 1993, she told a close colleague that she believed she was being let go for an unfair reason – that she was being terminated because of a medical issue she had been dealing with.

amp.cnn.com

Sandorski, Starbuck, you guys should seriously apologize.

I have nothing to apologize for.

 

[fskimospy]

I have nothing to apologize for.

You called me a rape apologist for questioning the story of someone who appears to be a serial liar.

If you don’t want to apologize I don’t really care as I don’t care what you think of me but for your own sake...Jesus.

 

[Starbuck1975]

I have nothing to apologize for.

You should be ashamed. How do you live with yourself. I was hoping you could be an adult. @fskimospy help me out, am I missing anything from the script?

 

[Jhhnn]

As always I appreciate your concern and am quite flattered that you insist on making your hypocrisy about me.

The Democrats, so desperate to stop a SCOTUS nomination, that they shoved an accuser who wished to remain anonymous into the public eye, and then rushed to embrace a grifter porn star lawyer in their failed attempt to establish a pattern of behavior that never solidified.

Fast forward two years, and the Democrats move the goal posts once their candidate is held to the same standard they advocated for, and then proceed to use the same shameful playbook to smear the accuser, similarly leveraged against other women like Paula Jones and Anita Hill.

The Democrats are the ones who chose to opportunistically politicize #metoo. Full stop.

It is clear to me who is on the wrong side of this issue, but I can’t stop you from carrying water for hypocrites.

And, uhh, what about Tara's bogus story? I thought it was cute the way you pretended to actually believe her & defended her mendacity. Plus your demand that anybody should apologize to her is pure chutzpah.

And now with extra whataboutism over Michael Avenatti? Utterly shameless.

 

[sandorski]

You called me a rape apologist for questioning the story of someone who appears to be a serial liar.

If you don’t want to apologize I don’t really care as I don’t care what you think of me but for your own sake...Jesus.

No, I said you were using Rape Apologist tactics. Which you were.

 

[ivwshane]

As always I appreciate your concern and am quite flattered that you insist on making your hypocrisy about me.

The Democrats, so desperate to stop a SCOTUS nomination, that they shoved an accuser who wished to remain anonymous into the public eye, and then rushed to embrace a grifter porn star lawyer in their failed attempt to establish a pattern of behavior that never solidified.

Fast forward two years, and the Democrats move the goal posts once their candidate is held to the same standard they advocated for, and then proceed to use the same shameful playbook to smear the accuser, similarly leveraged against other women like Paula Jones and Anita Hill.

The Democrats are the ones who chose to opportunistically politicize #metoo. Full stop.

It is clear to me who is on the wrong side of this issue, but I can’t stop you from carrying water for hypocrites.

Lol

You are like an articulate version of IJSSTG, your whole schtick is, “democrats are stupid phucktards!!” Only you use more words.

You remind me of another poster as well, werepossum, whose view of progressive democrats, was like yours, entirely made up in order to fit a narrative. Your last straw man/post was indicative of that.

 

[ivwshane]

No, I said you were using Rape Apologist tactics. Which you were.

Do you think, at this point, you are being a useful idiot or do you think this story still has legs?

 

[Jhhnn]

No, I said you were using Rape Apologist tactics. Which you were.

Now with the splitting of the finest hairs.

 

[fskimospy]

No, I said you were using Rape Apologist tactics. Which you were.

Shame on you. You should apologize.

You won’t, but you should.

 

[fskimospy]

You should be ashamed. How do you live with yourself. I was hoping you could be an adult. @fskimospy help me out, am I missing anything from the script?

You should be ashamed and you should apologize. You won’t, but you should.

 

[UberNeuman]

You should be ashamed and you should apologize. You won’t, but you should.

They take after their hero, Donald J.