The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

[Blackjack200]

Thanks for the highlight reel! What you just revealed to everyone is that not only did I not smear her but that you just lied about me smearing her.

It’s ok bro, I know since trump lost you haven’t been the same mentally and your dive off the deep is well documented on these forums.

Keep on keeping on.

When are you going to contribute something useful to the thread, clown?

 

[ivwshane]

When are you going to contribute something useful to the thread, clown?

When you post something legitimate, bro. Or when you can counter and not hand waive away legitimate concerns people have about the accuser. Maybe when you can respond to those questions without accusing them of being rape apologists.

In other words, probably never or at least until you get some medication for whatever the fuck is wrong with you.

 

[hal2kilo]

When you post something legitimate, bro. Or when you can counter and not hand waive away legitimate concerns people have about the accuser. Maybe when you can respond to those questions without accusing them of being rape apologists.

In other words, probably never or at least until you get some medication for whatever the fuck is wrong with you.

That sandyblack virus is somethin else.

 

[sandorski]

Don’t you know folks, the credibility of the person has no bearing on the credibility of the claims made by said person!!


...shit stupid people say.

Then make a comparison.

 

[interchange]

Except that there is no problem with her accusation. People are digging up ancillary stuff and insisting that it's the same as an issue with the accusation itself, it's not.

No problem? None whatsoever?

 

[TheVrolok]

No problem? None whatsoever?

Don't try to be rational with a BernieBro.

 

[soundforbjt]

Then make a comparison.

Why are polls that came out today showing Biden leading Trump with women by 22% in battleground states? Have they not heard the word yet or do they also not find Tara credible?

 

[Blackjack200]

When you post something legitimate, bro. Or when you can counter and not hand waive away legitimate concerns people have about the accuser. Maybe when you can respond to those questions without accusing them of being rape apologists.

In other words, probably never or at least until you get some medication for whatever the fuck is wrong with you.

In the last page or two of this thread I've posted opinion pieces that were published in The New York Times and The Nation.

If people don't want to be called rape apologists, they should stop behaving like them.

In any case, I guess the answer is never. Carry on, clown.

 

[sandorski]

Why are polls that came out today showing Biden leading Trump with women by 22% in battleground states? Have they not heard the word yet or do they also not find Tara credible?

Many believe Tara and still vowing to Vote Biden.

 

[Blackjack200]

No problem? None whatsoever?

Refer to the account that Reade gave to Katie Halper and tell me what the problem is.

 

[soundforbjt]

In the last page or two of this thread I've posted opinion pieces that were published in The New York Times and The Nation.

If people don't want to be called rape apologists, they should stop behaving like them.

In any case, I guess the answer is never. Carry on, clown.

Opinion pieces are rarely considered to be taken as factual no matter where they're published. It's one person's opinion, not a non biased look at the facts.

 

[Jhhnn]

Except that there is no problem with her accusation. People are digging up ancillary stuff and insisting that it's the same as an issue with the accusation itself, it's not.

Ancilliary stuff like her dishonest stealth edit of her Medium post? Here it is again-

Tara Reade’s Updated Medium Post: All Material Edits

4/29/20 Corrections:Reade made the new allegations public on March 24th, not the 26thThe “datemodified” in the source code indicates the most recent edit 5/8/20 Correction: Reade most r…

romansresearch.wordpress.com

It went from a generalized complaint about sexism to a charge of sexual assault. Yeh, sure, it doesn't stink if you're upwind.

And of course Joe grabbed her by the pussy in the hallway of a Senate office building, right when Bob Packwood's career as a sexual predator was being destroyed. He's just that stupid, obviously.

Bob Packwood - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ivwshane]

Opinion pieces are rarely considered to be taken as factual no matter where they're published. It's one person's opinion, not a non biased look at the facts.

Yeah, I don’t think he understands how opinion pieces work. Which is oddly another characteristic of right wingers and since I know he isn’t a righty then I can only conclude that he has mental health issues or health issues that are affecting his mind. Hopefully it’s not early signs of Alzheimer’s as delusions and impaired thinking are symptoms.

 

[sandorski]

Ancilliary stuff like her dishonest stealth edit of her Medium post? Here it is again-

Tara Reade’s Updated Medium Post: All Material Edits

4/29/20 Corrections:Reade made the new allegations public on March 24th, not the 26thThe “datemodified” in the source code indicates the most recent edit 5/8/20 Correction: Reade most r…

romansresearch.wordpress.com

It went from a generalized complaint about sexism to a charge of sexual assault. Yeh, sure, it doesn't stink if you're upwind.

And of course Joe grabbed her by the pussy in the hallway of a Senate office building, right when Bob Packwood's career as a sexual predator was being destroyed. He's just that stupid, obviously.

Bob Packwood - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Ya, cause when someone is being destroyed by something, no one else ever does that thing. May be the most immaterial point yet.

 

[soundforbjt]

Many believe Tara and still vowing to Vote Biden.

Reading those opinion pieces again?

 

[Blackjack200]

Opinion pieces are rarely considered to be taken as factual no matter where they're published. It's one person's opinion, not a non biased look at the facts.

What on earth are you talking about? It's provided as an informed perspective, and both pieces were published in reputable places. There's no such thing as a "non biased look at the facts", everyone has a viewpoint, even if they're not aware of it.

 

[soundforbjt]

What on earth are you talking about? It's provided as an informed perspective, and both pieces were published in reputable places. There's no such thing as a "non biased look at the facts", everyone has a viewpoint, even if they're not aware of it.

Have you ever looked at the table of contents/sections of the newspaper? And have you ever read the disclaimer on the Opinion section?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Don’t hate me Bros, I am just providing some numbers

This poll number shows something very important about the Tara Reade allegation

Ever since Tara Reade's allegation that former Vice President Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993 emerged, we've been waiting for hard data that provides some early signs of how the accusations -- and Biden's unequivocal denial -- are playing with the public.

www.cnn.com

 

[soundforbjt]

Don’t hate me Bros, I am just providing some numbers

This poll number shows something very important about the Tara Reade allegation

Ever since Tara Reade's allegation that former Vice President Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993 emerged, we've been waiting for hard data that provides some early signs of how the accusations -- and Biden's unequivocal denial -- are playing with the public.

www.cnn.com

Interesting since the poll included Republicans and they've been getting a daily dose of Reade on Fox nearly every week.

 

[Jhhnn]

Ya, cause when someone is being destroyed by something, no one else ever does that thing. May be the most immaterial point yet.

What's that smell?

 

[Blackjack200]

Interesting since the poll included Republicans and they've been getting a daily dose of Reade on Fox nearly every day.

LMAO THIS IS AN EDITORIAL.

Jesus Christ, could you be any more disingenuous?

 

[soundforbjt]

LMAO THIS IS AN EDITORIAL.

Jesus Christ, could you be any more disingenuous?

You didn't read that these were results of a new Monmouth University national poll ? That's what I was referring to, the results of the poll I was reading.

 

[UberNeuman]

You didn't read that these were results of a new Monmouth University national poll ?

English as a second language, for fun and profit. lol.

 

[Blackjack200]

You didn't read that these were results of a new Monmouth University national poll ? That's what I was referring to, the results of the poll I was reading.

Wait, so you went in and engaged with the content of the EDITORIAL PIECE? Is that what you're saying? That even though it's an EDITORIAL it can contain valuable information?

 

[Jhhnn]

Don’t hate me Bros, I am just providing some numbers

This poll number shows something very important about the Tara Reade allegation

Ever since Tara Reade's allegation that former Vice President Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993 emerged, we've been waiting for hard data that provides some early signs of how the accusations -- and Biden's unequivocal denial -- are playing with the public.

www.cnn.com

Behold! Proof positive that the theory of the Big Lie works!