sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,871
- 6,405
- 126
To a partisan everything looks partisan. To a person trying to make sound logical assessments of a situation in an unbiased manner, comparisons between similarities and differences in cases will be important evaluations to make in trying to make sense of things. There is no way this distinction will be obvious to a person who is biased and no way to communicate it to them. The best that can happen is for a bigot to see in others some form of bigotry he or she themselves does not have and then question if they may not be the same when it comes to their own area of prejudice. The root of bigotry, in my opinion, lies in having some sacred cow one is out to protect.All these weird contortions to avoid one comparison and insist on others. All similar allegations have similarities and differences. Comparing between alegations are based upon the argument(s) being made and not some arbitrary preference being foisted upon the discussion by those trying to avoid certain comparisons.
What has come forward that was verifiably who they said they were?????Conveniently ignoring the people who have come forward to validate the consistency of Reade’s accusations, and the Larry King caller that is most likely Reade’s mother. Maybe, just maybe, you are partisan.
actually these other posters are trying hard not to have to stoop to your level of idiocracy.....How is this a response to what I wrote?
What has come forward with proof that was verifiably who they said they were?????
actually these other posters are trying hard not to have to stoop to your level of idiocracy.....
Emma Green from the Atlantic has a very thoughtful article pointing out that some people will rationalize the obvious hypocrisy because the alternative is another Trump term. The conclusion of the article is that we lack a fair and transparent process to handle such allegations.There's only one person (including Larry King call) who offered any corroboration of a sexual assault. Let's be clear on that.
Since the situations share some similarities but also significant differences, I think the interpretation of statements made by politicians is bound to be subjective. I think my position is more in the middle on that.
okay -- so lets us start with the Trump allegations and then we can go on to the Bernie allegations.....seems fair to me...Emma Green from the Atlantic has a very thoughtful article pointing out that some people will rationalize the obvious hypocrisy because the alternative is another Trump term. The conclusion of the article is that we lack a fair and transparent process to handle such allegations.
The only process that matters is what voters think. We are way past the statute of limitations for criminal charges in this case.Emma Green from the Atlantic has a very thoughtful article pointing out that some people will rationalize the obvious hypocrisy because the alternative is another Trump term. The conclusion of the article is that we lack a fair and transparent process to handle such allegations.
The only process that matters is what voters think. We are way past the statute of limitations for criminal charges in this case.
Republican voters have made it crystal clear that morals and ethics don't mean shit because they will ignore immoral and unethical behavior by Republicans and manufacture immoral and unethical behavior by Democrats.
This has created an environment where many Democrats will also ignore immoral and unethical behavior by Democrats because they are still better than the Republican alternative. Enjoy this world you helped to create by indulging more than your fair share of manufactured outrage.
Emma Green from the Atlantic has a very thoughtful article pointing out that some people will rationalize the obvious hypocrisy because the alternative is another Trump term. The conclusion of the article is that we lack a fair and transparent process to handle such allegations.
That you are mentally deficient? Yes. Wholeheartedly.So you agree?
ftfy in case you missed most of the pressers.What about if it was Pence and Biden? Not the crazy evangelical butt kisser. This more competent pandemic Trump buttkissing Pence?
What about if it was Pence and Biden? Not the crazy evangelical butt kisser. This more competent pandemic Pence?
That you are mentally deficient? Yes. Wholeheartedly.
The competent pandemic Pence that refused to wear a mask because he wanted to look people in the eyes? No thanks.What about if it was Pence and Biden? Not the crazy evangelical butt kisser. This more competent pandemic Pence?
Emma Green from the Atlantic has a very thoughtful article pointing out that some people will rationalize the obvious hypocrisy because the alternative is another Trump term. The conclusion of the article is that we lack a fair and transparent process to handle such allegations.
Nice bit of holier than thou posturing & pretense. Believe women? Even when they're unbelievable, like Tara? Nobody said that.
Well then, don't be so excruciatingly vague when you post. I didn't read his article. I don't care what it says. I don't care how bad Democrats are because I know Republicans are worse. I also think it is incredibly stupid to consider politician personality as anything other than an afterthought next to policy.Nice one. However, how is what you posted not agreement with his summation of the article? Your only variation was blaming the Republicans for what the Democrats were now doing.
Fallacy.The changing goalposts are the confirmation of the Claim.
Fallacy.
ohh boo hoo get over it!! Don`t you have a Trump rally to attend somewhere???Hypocrisy is by definition a form of changing goalposts.
ohh boo hoo get over it!! Don`t you have a Trump rally to attend somewhere???
