• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Israeli conflict is getting to Bush

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: zendari
An extramarital affair is great for displaying class and dignity.

Ahhhhh. The old favorite. Bring up Clinton. We need a broken record symbol.

Silly boy--don't you realize that the stained blue dress (TM) trumps ANY and ALL fsck ups that King Georgie can possibly be the cause of?

😉

 
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
You do realize we have no diplomatic relations with North Korea or Syria?

Wow, you may want to tell the Syrian Embassy in DC they don't exist. Then maybe you can have a philisopical dicussion on the meaning of existence with them and come to the conclusion that you are in fact fruits.

http://www.syrianembassy.us/

I'd also like to point out that NK only has 5 Embassies world wide, China, Nepal, Switzerland, Lebannon, and the Ukraine. So having an embassy with NK would actually be the exception.
 
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.

Think the atmosphere of sex by his predecessor did more to do the above than Bush using an expletive.

 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.

Think the atmosphere of sex by his predecessor did more to do the above than Bush using an expletive.

Are you still hung up on Clinton? It's been six years. Haven't you got that stain out of your dress yet?
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.

Think the atmosphere of sex by his predecessor did more to do the above than Bush using an expletive.

Are you still hung up on Clinton? It's been six years. Haven't you got that stain out of your dress yet?


Hardly(pun intended). What you said about an Animal house represents more of the Clinton admin than Bush.

I suggest you face reality.


 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.

Think the atmosphere of sex by his predecessor did more to do the above than Bush using an expletive.

Are you still hung up on Clinton? It's been six years. Haven't you got that stain out of your dress yet?


Hardly(pun intended). What you said about an Animal house represents more of the Clinton admin than Bush.

I suggest you face reality.

bush was the legacy frat boy drunk. You should face reality.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: BBond
bush is the 2006 version of tricky dick nixon -- the king of "expletive deleted".

What a classy guy. A frat boy turning the White House into Animal House.

Think the atmosphere of sex by his predecessor did more to do the above than Bush using an expletive.

Are you still hung up on Clinton? It's been six years. Haven't you got that stain out of your dress yet?


Hardly(pun intended). What you said about an Animal house represents more of the Clinton admin than Bush.

I suggest you face reality.

bush was the legacy frat boy drunk. You should face reality.

So what is Clinton's excuse?
 
I'd die of shock if a day went by where either you or zentroll didn't respond with "Clinton's fault". It's been six years, he was a better president than this idiot. Get over it. And get that dress dry cleaned.
 
My Bush's rating went up a few points when I saw the clip of him talking to blair and saying they should stop doing this sh it.. lol.
 
This is how most real people talk anyway. Imagine the langauge that gets used in the White House situation room 😀

I have no fscking problem with this sh!t whatsoever. 😛
 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
I'd die of shock if a day went by where either you or zentroll didn't respond with "Clinton's fault". It's been six years, he was a better president than this idiot. Get over it. And get that dress dry cleaned.

You need to learn how to read then come back.

 
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: zendari
An extramarital affair is great for displaying class and dignity.

Ahhhhh. The old favorite. Bring up Clinton. We need a broken record symbol.


:cookie:

In February 2009 will you never again mention George W. Bush? I'll be waiting........
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: zendari
An extramarital affair is great for displaying class and dignity.

Ahhhhh. The old favorite. Bring up Clinton. We need a broken record symbol.


:cookie:

In February 2009 will you never again mention George W. Bush? I'll be waiting........

That's different, and you'd be an idiot to think it wasn't. Please grow up, and face up to reality.
 
Originally posted by: LcarsSystem
Originally posted by: zendari
In February 2009 will you never again mention George W. Bush? I'll be waiting........

That's different, and you'd be an idiot to think it wasn't. Please grow up, and face up to reality.

Yeah, ok.
 
So first the Bush wanted Syria to leave Lebanon, which it did, but now it wants Syria to stop Hezbollah in Lebanon? Someone is trying to have his lunch and eat it too.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: LcarsSystem
Originally posted by: zendari
In February 2009 will you never again mention George W. Bush? I'll be waiting........

That's different, and you'd be an idiot to think it wasn't. Please grow up, and face up to reality.

Yeah, ok.

I am pretty sure most people can see the difference, please explain to the class why you think they aren't different. If you can't then politely admit you were wrong and once again, grow up.
 
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Most of the "tension" is because of US/British medling with the governments in the mid east so they can control the flow of oil. Until this behavior changes, there will never be peace because someone will always be suffering as a result.
Not entirely true. Tensions between the western world and the Islamic world stem all the way back to the Crusades.

The Islamic world is not exactly a victim of this dynamic...just as the Crusades represented European interference in Middle Eastern affairs, the Islamic world has certainly made attempts to thrust their sword into Europe.

European imperialism and the fall of the Ottomon Turkish Empire after WW1 is what set the stage for the current tensions...as the western world managed to achieve a technological military superiority that the Islamic world simply could not match...and the arbitrary carving of the Middle East into random sovereign states that did not respect cultural and religious divisions throughout the region.

The creation of Israel and oil dependency have certainly raised America's stakes in the region, but our intervention is just a blip on the radar screen when compared to the conditions that established these tensions.


Such a refreshing post...to add...you can, in fact, put quite a bit of the blame on Britain and suprisingly, France, for the issues currently taking place in the region. The 2 appeared to be so worried about what the other got control of post WW1, they largely ignored the ideologies / issues present in the actual region when deciding who got what and when.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Pens1566
I'd die of shock if a day went by where either you or zentroll didn't respond with "Clinton's fault". It's been six years, he was a better president than this idiot. Get over it. And get that dress dry cleaned.

You need to learn how to read then come back.

Was I talking to you???? Feel a little guilty maybe? Learn to read.
 
Personally don't care if the President of the U.S says sh*t when he's not supposed to be in the public eye. Maybe what's needed is to elect politicians that are actually real people instead of career ahole politicians. But is that going to happen any time soon? Not while people try to hold these people to such a ridiculously high false standard. I abhor this administrations attempts at foreign policy, but I find this, of all the things Bush has done, to be one of the most harmless, up there with the "now watch this drive" quote.
 
Back
Top