Originally posted by: Frackal
Bush: He also seemed eager to leave: "Gotta go home. Got something to do tonight. How about you? Where are you going? Home?"
Geez I hope it was something that had to do with running the damn country
Not entirely true. Tensions between the western world and the Islamic world stem all the way back to the Crusades.Most of the "tension" is because of US/British medling with the governments in the mid east so they can control the flow of oil. Until this behavior changes, there will never be peace because someone will always be suffering as a result.
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
I am wrong about what? The fact that Dems wanted him to talk more and now that he is it's not working?
Can you blame Bush for not directly talking to N.Korea? Why should they get special treatment above anyone else with nukes? Why do you let them off the hook for not joining multi-party talks and blame the US for it?
North Korea launched missiles and then blamed it on the US for not talking to them directly. the rest of the world called bull on them for it. Can you imagine the disaster if the US did open direct talks with them and made them angry? Then they would blame it on us and the world would jump on the band waggon. Bush would be suicidal to enter into 1-on-1 talks with N.Korea.
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Omg a week ban for zen for pointing out Liberals can look like idiots too!!!!
/sarcasm
nice linkage by the way. 🙂
Can look like idiots? They've been doing that for 6 years ever since Gore was a sore loser.
Not to rehash this one . . . but getting more votes than your opponent and subsequently feeling a little cheated . . . ain't exactly sore.
It is curious to hear a tool like Bush talk about using engaged, direct discussion to solve conflict. But I imagine the hypocrisy didn't phase a true patriot like yourself.
So when he goes to war the liberals scream "you didn't try enough talk"!! Then when he talks instead of war with N.Korea, Lebanon and Syria he's a hypocrit for not going to war? Do you want him to attack or not? Who has trouble making up their minds?
As for the whole gore Bush thing I agree with you. I would have been irritated if I was Gore as well.
the bush policy on north korea is a closed door policy which is the problem. the previous administration had open talks with north korea, cameras in their facilities and access to anywhere and anything in the country. the concept of staying as close to your enemies as possible is not that difficult to understand. so you are wrong, it is not as simple as you either talk or go to war.
He's probably a mouth-breather. Ugh.Originally posted by: bctbct
The leader of our nation also chews with his mouth open...ugh
Originally posted by: nweaver
Clinton did more then talk, he gave them the reactors that they can use to create nuclear devices...but hey, he was talking!
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: nweaver
Clinton did more then talk, he gave them the reactors that they can use to create nuclear devices...but hey, he was talking!
Light water reactors are fairly innocuous when it comes to weapons.
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
I am wrong about what? The fact that Dems wanted him to talk more and now that he is it's not working?
Can you blame Bush for not directly talking to N.Korea? Why should they get special treatment above anyone else with nukes? Why do you let them off the hook for not joining multi-party talks and blame the US for it?
North Korea launched missiles and then blamed it on the US for not talking to them directly. the rest of the world called bull on them for it. Can you imagine the disaster if the US did open direct talks with them and made them angry? Then they would blame it on us and the world would jump on the band waggon. Bush would be suicidal to enter into 1-on-1 talks with N.Korea.
Because it's easy to blame the U.S. We're the bad guys everywhere for everything. C'mon get with the program.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Omg a week ban for zen for pointing out Liberals can look like idiots too!!!!
/sarcasm
nice linkage by the way. 🙂
Can look like idiots? They've been doing that for 6 years ever since Gore was a sore loser.
Not to rehash this one . . . but getting more votes than your opponent and subsequently feeling a little cheated . . . ain't exactly sore.
It is curious to hear a tool like Bush talk about using engaged, direct discussion to solve conflict. But I imagine the hypocrisy didn't phase a true patriot like yourself.
So when he goes to war the liberals scream "you didn't try enough talk"!! Then when he talks instead of war with N.Korea, Lebanon and Syria he's a hypocrit for not going to war? Do you want him to attack or not? Who has trouble making up their minds?
As for the whole gore Bush thing I agree with you. I would have been irritated if I was Gore as well.
The trouble with Gore was that he wasn't irritated enough, or honest enough to demand a total recount of the whole state instead of areas where Democrats had majorities. He was the winner state wide in total legal votes and should have been President.
As for this thread, how long you speak depends on how much you have to say in relation to how much your audience knows. In this regard Bush shouldn't talk ever and listen constantly.
Hey look, Pavlov's Dog!
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: wazzledoozle
http://www.forbes.com/finance/feeds/afx/2006/07/17/afx2882558.html
Later, Bush added that 'the irony is, what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this sh it, and it's over,' though he does not specify who 'they' are.
The recording picked up as Bush, apparently expected to make remarks, declared: 'I'm just going to make it up. I'm not going to talk too damn long like the rest of them. Some of these guys talk too long.'
😀
Is it ok to bypass the filter on a quote?
You are making a big deal out of nothing!! Bush is absolutely correct in what he is saying!!
I think it is you who has issues....
Wow, ban for trolling.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Omg a week ban for zen for pointing out Liberals can look like idiots too!!!!
/sarcasm
nice linkage by the way. 🙂
Can look like idiots? They've been doing that for 6 years ever since Gore was a sore loser.
Not to rehash this one . . . but getting more votes than your opponent and subsequently feeling a little cheated . . . ain't exactly sore.
It is curious to hear a tool like Bush talk about using engaged, direct discussion to solve conflict. But I imagine the hypocrisy didn't phase a true patriot like yourself.
So when he goes to war the liberals scream "you didn't try enough talk"!! Then when he talks instead of war with N.Korea, Lebanon and Syria he's a hypocrit for not going to war? Do you want him to attack or not? Who has trouble making up their minds?
As for the whole gore Bush thing I agree with you. I would have been irritated if I was Gore as well.
The trouble with Gore was that he wasn't irritated enough, or honest enough to demand a total recount of the whole state instead of areas where Democrats had majorities. He was the winner state wide in total legal votes and should have been President.
As for this thread, how long you speak depends on how much you have to say in relation to how much your audience knows. In this regard Bush shouldn't talk ever and listen constantly.
Hey look, Pavlov's Dog!
OK, I see you, now what. Was I supposed to be somehow interested in your Pavlovian response to my post?
Originally posted by: zendari
You're the one who mentioned class and dignity. How quickly things are forgotten!
Originally posted by: zendari
Too bad he twice earned the Presidency of the United States, and got more votes than Slick Willy ever did.
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: zendari
Too bad he twice earned the Presidency of the United States, and got more votes than Slick Willy ever did.
earned, right, ok. nice diversion too. dumbya has minimal respect at home, let alone globally, and well, he is the smacktard in chief, so he is the prez, not Clinton, try living in the today and not in the 7 years ago. God sakes, what, were you like 11 then? So worldly you are, so wise. You mom was buying you underoos when Clinton was president. LOL!