Your point is worthless because GameStop is the only place that actually has certain titles in stock a lot of the time. Try finding blazblue in target and Walmart. You won't find it.
And your point is worthless because you think a behemoth that is on the decline can make up for massively shifting industry trends by living off of titles like BlazBlue. That's hilarious! Maybe Blockbuster could have saved itself by offering piles of Anime :biggrin:
Plus GameStop does digital games too. Bet you didn't know that did you? It isn't different from green man gaming and other sites that offer codes that work on steam. Amazon is offering a psn store and it won't be long before GameStop does the same thing I bet.
Yes, because it's such a big secret
Unless GS can offer something significant over Amazon, PSN, XBL in the long run, so what. The GS we know today will exist in name only tomorrow, and that's best case scenario. We're talking about B&M stores and the used game model for all intents and purposes, but if you want to move the goalposts to digital distribution, that's fine with me. The fact that you need to compare GS to GMG to make your point speaks volumes. Maybe you're too emotionally invested in this discussion to recognize this, but I'm pretty sure we just watched Blockbuster go through a very similar transformation
Regardless, you're dodging the issue, which is that used game sales are the rock of GS' business model, and that's going to die sooner rather than later. Here's an article highlighting just how delicate GameStop's model is, given how reliant it is on publishers' cooperation and how easily it could fall victim to their whims:
Forbes - Why GameStop Is Still In Trouble After Microsoft's Used Game Clarifications
The critical takeaway here is that GameStop's current model can only be successful as long as publishers
AND console manufacturers
CHOOSE to remain compliant. I wouldn't hold your breath. Microsoft took a run at it a few months ago, but if you think that was their last shot on goal, you're sadly mistaken. The fact that that's where their intentions are aimed is telling enough.
Moving along. Article discussing the piss poor earnings last year that I was referring to:
It May Be "Game Over" For GameStop Soon
Here's a teaser:
The video game retailer is coming off another disappointing quarter. Sales plunged 11% to $1.55 billion, well short of the $1.61 billion that Wall Street was expecting. Same-store sales fell by a problematic 9.3%.
Ouch. So comparing this year's numbers to those numbers is pretty stupid. There was a similar trend in 2011, as well.
Of course all of that can be largely ignored, because the coup de grâce can be predicted by anyone sensible enough to look at PC gaming as an indicator. Walk into any store (GS, WalMart, Target, etc) and try to purchase one. Oh wait, you can't. Why? Because not long after PC games were made widely available via digital distribution, it became pointless to sell them in stores. If you can't see the significance of that, you're too emotionally invested in the outcome to be having the discussion.
Hell,
when I was in a GS a few weeks ago looking for a PS4, I had to wait forever while a GS employee explained to some stubborn argumentative fanboy why they didn't sell PC games. "We don't sell them because most people just download them from Steam or whatever." GS employee's words, not mine. Maybe you were the guy standing in front of me who just didn't 'get it,' or maybe you're the sole GS employee/shareholder who ignored the memo. GS can try to play in that arena, but they're going to have to share that pie with a LOT of other players, including the likes of Amazon. Yikes.
So which one are you? GS employee or shareholder?