Interesting. I was fantastically good at chemistry. All these things fascinate me. I was equally great at physics as chemistry. I agree(d) that physics>chemistry, so it was my major at the U. But once in upper division physics became so abstract and divorced from sensory experience that I lost interest and changed to math. Ultimately I got my degree in math. Math > *Sociology can't exist without Psychology
Psychology can't exist without Biology
Biology can't exist without Chemistry
Chemistry can't exist without Physics
Physics can't exist without Math
Math>Physics>Chemistry>Biology>Psychology>Sociology
You can prove a lot of things but not everything. For instance, and of utmost importance, is that some of the things you take for granted in all this provable stuff isn't provable.agreed
none of the others have provable correctness
It's sort of an intellectual discipline. In large part it's an intellectual set of tools designed to solve real world problems. As such it's absolutely essential to modern civilization. There are areas of math that are outside practical application, but are nevertheless of interest. Mathematicians like to think of themselves as not thinking any of it superior. It's a heady realm.Math isn’t a science.
Yeah, but how do you prove math is correct? A number is something people made up, therefore it's wrong.
But if you were to prove math correct, you would do it through engineering. Checkmate, plebs.
Don't try to uplift that idiot!You can't reduce each of those to the one 'above' (or 'below') them. They are each applicable at their own level. Try explaining Trump's election solely in terms of fundamental equations of physics. Give us your full derivation, starting with, say, the underlying equations of string theory, and ending with '....therefore, Trump.'
Furthermore (as someone whose favourite subjects were always maths and physics) it sometimes seems to me it goes round in a loop, because sociology underlies all of them. It determines how all the other disciplines operate and what conclusions they come to. They are all, ultimately, sociological phenomena. Psychology, for example, strikes me as being largely a concequence of sociology. In my experience, psychologists believe what they do because it meets the socially-determined needs of the kind of people who become psychologists, not because it's true. That's why its record, both as a clinical practice and an academic discipline, is so bad!
Yet God exist without any of the above!!!Sociology can't exist without Psychology
Psychology can't exist without Biology
Biology can't exist without Chemistry
Chemistry can't exist without Physics
Physics can't exist without Math
Math>Physics>Chemistry>Biology>Psychology>Sociology
Yeah, but how do you prove math is correct? A number is something people made up, therefore it's wrong.
But if you were to prove math correct, you would do it through engineering. Checkmate, plebs.
Mathematics is the language of the universe. If we ever met an alien civilization we would be able to communicate with them through mathematics. The symbols we use may be chosen by us but we can create a Rosetta Stone of we ever met an alien civilization.
Engineering is applied physics, and you can't have applied physics without mathematics.
Checkmate douche.
Ah, one vote for God. I think atheism is a pretty powerful modern concept with a lot to be said for it.Yet God exist without any of the above!!!
"A little learning is a dangerous thing. Drink deep or taste not the Pierian Spring." - Alexander Popescience is dangerous
Can Maths exist without philosophy?
agreed
none of the others have provable correctness
I don`t need to! Either you believe or you don`t! It really is that simple!can you prove that?