Specop 007
Diamond Member
- Jan 31, 2005
- 9,454
- 0
- 0
I just searched Google for Communist News Network. It doesn't exist so you'll have to find another subject for your paranoia.Originally posted by: Specop 007
Fox beats the hell out of Communist News Network.
Originally posted by: Harvey
I just searched Google for Communist News Network. It doesn't exist so you'll have to find another subject for your paranoia.Originally posted by: Specop 007
Fox beats the hell out of Communist News Network.![]()
You didn't try hard enough. :laugh:Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I just searched for Faux News and didn't find any such network.
Originally posted by: Harvey
You didn't try hard enough. :laugh:Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I just searched for Faux News and didn't find any such network.
I mean you REALLY didn't try hard enough.![]()
We report. You decide. Does President Bush owe his controversial win in 2000 to Fox cable television news?
Yes, suggest data collected by two economists who found that the growth of the Fox cable news network in the late 1990s may have significantly boosted the Republican Party's share of the vote in the 2000 election and delivered Florida to Bush.
"Our estimates imply that Fox News convinced 3 to 8 percent of its audience to shift its voting behavior towards the Republican Party, a sizable media persuasion effect," said Stefano DellaVigna of the University of California at Berkely and Ethan Kaplan of Stockholm University.
In Florida alone, they estimate, the Fox effect may have produced more than 10,000 additional votes for Bush -- clearly a decisive factor in a state he carried by fewer than 600 votes.
Fox cable news debuted in 1996 as a competitor to CNN and four years later was available to about one in five Americans. That allowed DellaVigna and Kaplan to compare changes in the Republican vote shar efrom 1996 to 2000 in 9,256 cities and towns where Fox News was introduced. They also examined election cdata from 2004.
The Experiment: The Fox Effect II
We experiment. You decide: Do people apply a political litmus test to the news?
Yes, suggest the results of the latest online experiment by The Washington Post, washingtonpost.com and Stanford University's political communication lab.
The test found Republicans preferred to get their news from Fox -- even when the news stories were about subjects far removed from politics, such as sports or travel.
On the other hand, Democrats avoided Fox when it came to political news and preferred National Public Radio and CNN. And when the news focused on controversial issues such as the Iraq war and politics, "partisans are especially likely to screen out sources they consider opposed to their political views," said Stanford professor Shanto Iyengar, director of the communication lab.
More than 2,000 people participated in the test of whether attention to the identical news story was increased or decreased when the story was attributed to Fox News, NPR, CNN or the BBC. Participants saw a brief headline accompanied by the logo of the news organization. They were asked to choose which story they wanted to see, then repeated the task across six news categories -- American politics, the war in Iraq, race in America, crime, travel and sports.
There was one twist: Some participants saw a story attributed to Fox, whereas others saw the same story attributed to CNN, NPR or the BBC. Comparing the percentage of Democrats who chose to see a story about race if it was on Fox vs. CNN offered clues about whether partisanship mattered.
The results found strong evidence that people apply a political litmus test to the news, avoiding sources they view as unfriendly while seeking out compatible sources, a finding confirmed by researchers at Polimetrix in a national study with a representative sample of adults done in cooperation with the Stanford lab.
The Republicans even preferred to get news about sports and travel from Fox while Democrats didn't have as strong a preference on non-political stories, Iyengar found.
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
FOX delivers their pablum aimed at the lowest common denominator - the 34% who suck up to the Bush Administration.
Remember that - the AVERAGE AMERICAN . . . and half the population is even dumber than that.
Now again, those who want their paranoid, baseless fears and their biggoted, spiteful view of the world re-inforced
will seek the News outlet that provides them the coverage that they want - regardless of the truth or facts.
FOX is nothing less than a semi-official house organ style mouthpeice for the GOP Agenda, it was built that way.
Originally posted by: Harvey
OK. Would you prefer I pick up on a dildo brained air head like Brit Hume?Originally posted by: Fern
Not to pick on Harvey, but this a common problem here (confusing news reporting with opinion pieces or shows) and then complaining about it. O'Reilly is NOT a news broadcast. It's an "opinion" show, a show about HIS opinion.
The fact is, EVERYTHING on fox is an opinion, whether they call it "news" or not. :roll:
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Fox beats the hell out of Communist News Network.
Originally posted by: MAW1082
Yeah, I guess I'm going to have to go with the NY Times, even after that whole fake reporting thing . . .
Originally posted by: stinkz
When I read the same opinion of Fox News stated over and over again mindlessly in this thread, I chuckle when the opinion ironically contains the word "brainwashed."
Of course the left cannot see the bias in their own reporting because they themselves are so incredibly biased.
i agree in most part. however, therein lies a dig....the pro-administration tone, or rather the pro neocon tone they employ. fox does not report any news or commentary solely for the sake of informing the public, they will report and comment on news using "truthiness" with the subtle insidious intent of making us see things "their way".No matter what you think of Fox News's editorial bias, it resonates with a pretty large segment of the population. I rented a room from a guy who got up every morning to watch Fox and Friends, and relied on Fox News for all his information. Fox actually does a pretty good job of reporting news events, though they have a pro-administration tone to their reporting. The catch is that most of the programming on Fox News is not news -- it's commentary.
We report. You decide.
Fixed.
Originally posted by: Harvey
OK. Would you prefer I pick up on a dildo brained air head like Brit Hume?Originally posted by: Fern
Not to pick on Harvey, but this a common problem here (confusing news reporting with opinion pieces or shows) and then complaining about it. O'Reilly is NOT a news broadcast. It's an "opinion" show, a show about HIS opinion.
The fact is, EVERYTHING on fox is an opinion, whether they call it "news" or not. :roll:
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Article link
One-quarter of consumers abandoned a news source over the past year because they lost trust in its reporting, according to a new survey that also found the BBC, Fox News and Al Jazeera the most trusted brands in their respective home regions.
Unfortunately the article doesn't go into much more detail on the Fox News thing....but again. What the hell????
Who do you trust? MSNBC?