Atreidin
Senior member
- Mar 31, 2011
- 464
- 27
- 86
You have forever humbled my opinion of humanity.
I'm well aware of what it means. It's also not difficult to feel superior to someone with such a blatant incapability of understanding something so simple.
If you aren't trolling maybe you should look up what "whoosh" means on urban dictionary.
I'd explain my comments to you but it isn't fun arguing with trolls. And if you aren't a troll, it still isn't fun explaining things to know-it-alls with a laughably false sense of superiority.
I'm well aware of what it means. It's also not difficult to feel superior to someone with such a blatant incapability of understanding something so simple.
It's called a joke. 10cm^2 is obviously bigger than any wafer size
What? You know that wafers are 300mm in diameter, that's more than 700cm2.
It's pretty amazing how someone could not understand something so elementary. That is why your "joke" wasn't funny. It was downright depressing that you could not grasp what I was saying.However, I have to give you an A for effort in your attempt to draw attention away from your inane statement which I initially mocked.
Your ignorance of the GPU industry is astounding.I lol if anyone thinks the 680 was always meant to be the 680. They only got away with calling it a 680 b/c of the weak competition from AMD.
The biggest die you can massproduce atm is around 900mm2 due to the litho/mask. (If I recall right.)
Everything about GK104 is mid-range, design, specs, size, everything.
It's being sold as a high end card.
The OP begs his opposition to stop making claims that have been repeatedly backed by evidence. The OP then makes baseless claims. Finally, he asked for evidence from the opposition, but disallowed the use of the #1 fact that the opposition can use.And I thought op was smart
Are you talking about the 6800 series? That wasn't "testing the waters." That was a direct result of TSMC scrapping their 32nm process. The 6900 series was delayed because it was planned to be a 32nm part until the very last hour. The 6800 series was moved away from the 32nm process when it became apparent that it wasn't as cost effective as 40nm.It doesnt matter... It is faster than the 580 so even if AMD hadnt released the 7970, Nvidia would still have priced the 680 at 400$ minimum
One thing people seem to conveniently forget... When was the last time Nvidia released a mid range card before the high end? Never in the last 10 years at least... AMD was the only one to do that, to "test the waters", but Nvidia always releases their high end first
Er, yes? What else could they have done?And lets imagine for a moment that the 7970 was way faster than the 680... What then? Would Nvidia just sit on their butts with a midrange card that cant compete for a whole year? Are you serious?
Yeah, Nvidia is prideful, but this is just ridiculous. If "taking the leadership" is so easy that you can just "plan" for it... I don't even know what to say to this. Given what you lead into this statement with, it seems as this is what you are trying to say.Its obvious Nvidia planned the 680 to take the leadership since long ago, thats just the kind of company they are, too proud to give up the top spot
HD7970 Ghz Edition is the fastest single GPU card on the market so it doesn't matter what they call the 680...flagship or mid range....
Either their flagship gets beaten or their best mid range gets beaten.
I sense some NV egos here are upset by that.:whiste:
HD7970 Ghz Edition is the fastest single GPU card on the market so it doesn't matter what they call the 680...flagship or mid range....
Either their flagship gets beaten or their best mid range gets beaten.
I sense some NV egos here are upset by that.:whiste:
The point is that this is irrelevant... Its the fastest card Nvidia has, regardless of what it is called, so its their high end
Because by the die size/power logic, every previous AMD card since the 3870 has been a midrange card
Funny to see NV fanboys spinning stuff all the time though... By the time GK110 is here, so will the 8970, so whats your point?
Like mentioned by chimax, there is evidence of it but it just didn't work out because GK100 was well publicized to have failed, and GK110 is still a work in progress. GK104 is their highest part that they can produce right now. And who cares anyway? The only people bringing this up are those trying to start an argument, period.. Whatever.
I don't recall anything bigger than Nehalem EX (beckton) measuring 684 mm2 on the market.
