The Growth of Walmart

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,508
146
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Well, Walmart does have a habit of taking brands and "diluting" the quality of the product. Corners are cut, cheaper parts are used, all so more can be made and sold faster. In the end, the product brand name suffers.

Snapper did the right thing. I personally equated Snapper with durability (there's a 35 year old Snapper mower in our family that my grandfather originally bought). If that brand were sold through Walmart (or hell, any other major retailer) I'd be sad, simply because I know that things would change.

Change is good a lot of the time, in the case of Walmart I can't say that it is.

You cannot argue that they value money over quality and service, and these were the principles that Mr. Walton wanted Walmart to carry.

If he still lived I imagine Walmart would have taken a much different direction. A more "Lets keep our product manufacturing local" mentality. As it stands Walmart weilds so much power over manufacturers that they can make or break them. The current Walmart will dictate if XYZ is made in the USA or in a warehouse in Tiawan for pennies/dollars less.

Walmart actually has/had the ability to help steer the direction of our economy. I personally think they've helped devalue the dollar (along with the rest of us and our poor financial choices)

to be fair if you expect a $99 lawnmower from walmart to be the same quality as one purchased from a lawn and one purchased (for far more) from a lawn store you are nieve.

If you mean me directly, am I that nieve? Then no, I'm not. I wasn't implying that I thought that or expected it. If you mean the buying consumer in general, then yeah, I disagree with you there. There are MANY people I know that think the one they get at Walmart is the same thing you get at the higher end store.

but the case of pepsi, tube of toothpase, mac and cheese, etc is the same as the one in Target or jewel store.

BUT yes they do have manufactures produce a special series for them. usually useing cheaper goods (looked at a rideing lawnmower at walmart that had a lot of plastic compared to the one from Lowe's).

And doing this makes products that the poorest among us could never dream owning now affordable to them.

Walmart is not a high end store. They never claimed to be. What they HAVE claimed is to offer the lowest price possible on the products they sell.

The vast majority of what Walmart sells is the same damn thing you can buy anywhere else. On the LUXURY (electronics, furniture and small appliances) items, they offer lower end products at price points never seen before.

And here we go back to the single mother of 4: So WHAT if the mower she bought is of lower quality??? For the first time in her income bracket she could AFFORD a mower. What is wrong with offering lower end products to people who previously could never dream of even owning such things???

When I bought my lawn tractor did I go to Walmart? No, I am able to AFFORD a high end product so I went where those are sold. I also did not bitch that Walmart sells lower end products. Why should I? I know that there are people out there who can't afford anything else and I would never dream of hating Walmart simply because they offer these items.

I still cannot understand all the bitching over a store that has offered the opportunity for poorest among us to own items they previously never dreamed they could afford.

I wasn't really bitching about Walmart, only pointing out the obvious. I'm not sure why you're so worked up over this, but it sounds like you're about to have a stroke. I don't argue that Walmart hasn't done some good. It's just the bad far out weighs the good at this point, and had better executive decisions been made earlier on this might not be the case.

Yes, you give the single mom the chance to finally own the lawn mower she needed, that's great. I live in SC, so I see plenty of examples for your argument.

However, in the end, Walmart fucks the lower class in any given area by bringing down wages, so you do the math.

How does Walmart bring down wages??? They pay about average for a non-skilled retail job AND they bring more jobs to an area. Do you honestly think the bag boy at the run-down "mom and pop" store was making more than he did at Walmart???

No, I'm not about to have a stroke. I am just trying to point out that Walmart has brought a far better quality of life to the poorest among us. I have done the math. And I did it without reading anti-capitalist ranters who mindlessly hate anything that is the most successful. Be it Walmart, AOL or Microsoft. They are as predictable as trained dogs.

If Walmart wasn't a decent employer, they couldn't find employees. If Walmart didn't offer what people wanted, they couldn't find customers. Period.

Only the elitist sits back and tells the people they are too stupid to make their own choices and that they, the elitist, must make them for them. The elitist cannot STAND that Walmart is popular enough among both it's customers and employees that it has become wildly successful. In fact, it seems the elitist cannot stand anything that is wildly successful for that matter.
 

herm0016

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2005
8,516
1,128
126
walmart has provided a lot of jobs for my town, jobs that would not have been here. they helped to give employment to lots of people that would have otherwise never have had a job, and i can afford to feed myself a bit better when shopping there. it has impacted the local places, but i do not believe walmart coming to town has made any of them close, they seem to be specialized more and we still have a mom&pop grocery and another grocery chain in town.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: Amused


Show me a Walmart that raised its prices (beyond the rate of inflation) after the competition failed to compete and closed.

Hasn't happened.

They do it by lowering the quality of the brand. You cannot sell quality year after year and not raise prices.

Walmart sells the SAME brands of household goods as any other store. The percentage of products made in China at a Walmart is no more than any other discount store. What an absurd reason to pay more for the same damn stuff.


Walmart is the biggest retailer of goods made outside the USA. So I choose to support USA companies as much as I can. And yes that may mean paying more. The attitude of "an absurd reason to pay more for the same damn stuff" is the reason why many USA companies went under. People putting price over loyalty.


Fact: Walmart's business plan has enabled it to sell THE SAME GOODS to people at much lower prices. This brings a HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE to the poorest among us. Capitalism is about competition. FREE trade, not fair trade. You do not cut the legs off all the football players so that the legless player can compete. Just as you do not limit Walmart's growth and perfectly LEGAL business practices just so small business owners with 100 year old business models can compete.

Some goods it does sell lower, and that does help some people. The problem is it is not fair trade when walmart uses its weight to push out the competition among manufacturers. Which it has done since Sam Walton died.

Would you rather cut your shopping bill by a third and have sh!tty service, or pay a third more and have personalized service? If you choose the later, you have the LUXURY of doing so. But what of the single mother of 4 who scrubs toilets for a living? I guess she's just supposed to do without because you think she deserves better service over a higher standard of living, right?

What makes you think it cost a third more for personalized service ? That single mother of four, does just fine here without walmart. You are talking like walmart is a public service to the poor. They are not. They take away far more jobs than they create and lower the quality of the merchandise available. What good is a product at walmart if I buy it then have to buy it again within a month because it broke ? If you are living paycheck to paycheck that works out to making monthly payments to walmart.



 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Amused

So what? The success of Walmart obviously means they are selling what a large enough percentage of people want, at prices they want.

Why is it bad to sell cheaper lawn mowers at $99? Why is it bad to sell cheaper goods that the lower classes can afford? Should they be forced to do without because elitists don't like that walmart sells cheaper goods? Should they be forced to buy used equipment? Or is it just that you don't believe the poor should cut their lawns at all?

The most elitist part of the hate walmart bandwaggon is displayed right in this very thread: Walmart sucks because it's filled with redecks and minorities.

Wow... a store that becomes successful by offering better selection, prices and a higher quality of life than ever before to the poorest among us is bad because those poorest among us go there.

hmmmm....

It isn't that Walmart is selling what people want. It is that they are selling what people have access to. Consider this:

A city with several shops selling quality merchandise.
Walmart comes in selling lower quality, at low prices, even buying out the makers of the quality merchandise telling them, sell at our price or go out of business.
Once the competition is gone, walmart charges whatever it wants. You can no longer buy quality because those manufacturers now no longer exist. It isn't competition or low prices at this point, it is a monopoly.

You say people in this thread hate walmart because it is filled with rednecks and minorities when you yourself imply that only low class people shop at walmart.

Personally I shop at walmart only when absolutely necessary. China has enough of our money without me helping both a mega corporation and them. Instead I live in a small town where there are the shops that a walmart store would have closed. They have tried several times to interest the town in coming here. No thanks, we like our town the way it is.

And guess what ? We have many many poor people here and there are no complaints. I rather walk in a grocery store where the manager says Hi, and the cashiers talk to you , the pharmacist know you by name and when I go to a specialty store, the person there really cares about what I want to buy. It isn't some teenager who could care less.

Show me a Walmart that raised its prices (beyond the rate of inflation) after the competition failed to compete and closed.

Hasn't happened.

Walmart sells the SAME brands of household goods as any other store. The percentage of products made in China at a Walmart is no more than any other discount store. What an absurd reason to pay more for the same damn stuff.

Fact: Walmart's business plan has enabled it to sell THE SAME GOODS to people at much lower prices. This brings a HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE to the poorest among us. Capitalism is about competition. FREE trade, not fair trade. You do not cut the legs off all the football players so that the legless player can compete. Just as you do not limit Walmart's growth and perfectly LEGAL business practices just so small business owners with 100 year old business models can compete.

Would you rather cut your shopping bill by a third and have sh!tty service, or pay a third more and have personalized service? If you choose the later, you have the LUXURY of doing so. But what of the single mother of 4 who scrubs toilets for a living? I guess she's just supposed to do without because you think she deserves better service over a higher standard of living, right?

I believe that would be the "trailer trash" that most of the faux-compassionate, ma and pa loving posters are talking about.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Well, Walmart does have a habit of taking brands and "diluting" the quality of the product. Corners are cut, cheaper parts are used, all so more can be made and sold faster. In the end, the product brand name suffers.

Snapper did the right thing. I personally equated Snapper with durability (there's a 35 year old Snapper mower in our family that my grandfather originally bought). If that brand were sold through Walmart (or hell, any other major retailer) I'd be sad, simply because I know that things would change.

Change is good a lot of the time, in the case of Walmart I can't say that it is.

You cannot argue that they value money over quality and service, and these were the principles that Mr. Walton wanted Walmart to carry.

If he still lived I imagine Walmart would have taken a much different direction. A more "Lets keep our product manufacturing local" mentality. As it stands Walmart weilds so much power over manufacturers that they can make or break them. The current Walmart will dictate if XYZ is made in the USA or in a warehouse in Tiawan for pennies/dollars less.

Walmart actually has/had the ability to help steer the direction of our economy. I personally think they've helped devalue the dollar (along with the rest of us and our poor financial choices)


4 years ago I purchased a John Deere riding mower from a John Deere Dealer. It ran $2200. I have had so many costly repairs on this thing that it would have been more economical for me to buy two cheap riding lawn mowers from Walmart. So, is Walmart the only culprit of cheaply-made products?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Well, Walmart does have a habit of taking brands and "diluting" the quality of the product. Corners are cut, cheaper parts are used, all so more can be made and sold faster. In the end, the product brand name suffers.

Snapper did the right thing. I personally equated Snapper with durability (there's a 35 year old Snapper mower in our family that my grandfather originally bought). If that brand were sold through Walmart (or hell, any other major retailer) I'd be sad, simply because I know that things would change.

Change is good a lot of the time, in the case of Walmart I can't say that it is.

You cannot argue that they value money over quality and service, and these were the principles that Mr. Walton wanted Walmart to carry.

If he still lived I imagine Walmart would have taken a much different direction. A more "Lets keep our product manufacturing local" mentality. As it stands Walmart weilds so much power over manufacturers that they can make or break them. The current Walmart will dictate if XYZ is made in the USA or in a warehouse in Tiawan for pennies/dollars less.

Walmart actually has/had the ability to help steer the direction of our economy. I personally think they've helped devalue the dollar (along with the rest of us and our poor financial choices)

to be fair if you expect a $99 lawnmower from walmart to be the same quality as one purchased from a lawn and one purchased (for far more) from a lawn store you are nieve.

If you mean me directly, am I that nieve? Then no, I'm not. I wasn't implying that I thought that or expected it. If you mean the buying consumer in general, then yeah, I disagree with you there. There are MANY people I know that think the one they get at Walmart is the same thing you get at the higher end store.

but the case of pepsi, tube of toothpase, mac and cheese, etc is the same as the one in Target or jewel store.

BUT yes they do have manufactures produce a special series for them. usually useing cheaper goods (looked at a rideing lawnmower at walmart that had a lot of plastic compared to the one from Lowe's).

And doing this makes products that the poorest among us could never dream owning now affordable to them.

Walmart is not a high end store. They never claimed to be. What they HAVE claimed is to offer the lowest price possible on the products they sell.

The vast majority of what Walmart sells is the same damn thing you can buy anywhere else. On the LUXURY (electronics, furniture and small appliances) items, they offer lower end products at price points never seen before.

And here we go back to the single mother of 4: So WHAT if the mower she bought is of lower quality??? For the first time in her income bracket she could AFFORD a mower. What is wrong with offering lower end products to people who previously could never dream of even owning such things???

When I bought my lawn tractor did I go to Walmart? No, I am able to AFFORD a high end product so I went where those are sold. I also did not bitch that Walmart sells lower end products. Why should I? I know that there are people out there who can't afford anything else and I would never dream of hating Walmart simply because they offer these items.

I still cannot understand all the bitching over a store that has offered the opportunity for poorest among us to own items they previously never dreamed they could afford.

I wasn't really bitching about Walmart, only pointing out the obvious. I'm not sure why you're so worked up over this, but it sounds like you're about to have a stroke. I don't argue that Walmart hasn't done some good. It's just the bad far out weighs the good at this point, and had better executive decisions been made earlier on this might not be the case.

Yes, you give the single mom the chance to finally own the lawn mower she needed, that's great. I live in SC, so I see plenty of examples for your argument.

However, in the end, Walmart fucks the lower class in any given area by bringing down wages, so you do the math.


bringing down wages against whom? mom and pop stores? doubtful. And Target, KMart, Sears all pay the same as Walmart.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Well, Walmart does have a habit of taking brands and "diluting" the quality of the product. Corners are cut, cheaper parts are used, all so more can be made and sold faster. In the end, the product brand name suffers.

Snapper did the right thing. I personally equated Snapper with durability (there's a 35 year old Snapper mower in our family that my grandfather originally bought). If that brand were sold through Walmart (or hell, any other major retailer) I'd be sad, simply because I know that things would change.

Change is good a lot of the time, in the case of Walmart I can't say that it is.

You cannot argue that they value money over quality and service, and these were the principles that Mr. Walton wanted Walmart to carry.

If he still lived I imagine Walmart would have taken a much different direction. A more "Lets keep our product manufacturing local" mentality. As it stands Walmart weilds so much power over manufacturers that they can make or break them. The current Walmart will dictate if XYZ is made in the USA or in a warehouse in Tiawan for pennies/dollars less.

Walmart actually has/had the ability to help steer the direction of our economy. I personally think they've helped devalue the dollar (along with the rest of us and our poor financial choices)


4 years ago I purchased a John Deere riding mower from a John Deere Dealer. It ran $2200. I have had so many costly repairs on this thing that it would have been more economical for me to buy two cheap riding lawn mowers from Walmart. So, is Walmart the only culprit of cheaply-made products?

the small john deer mowers are not a good idea to buy. the are made bye a diffrent company and rebadged as john deers. no way would i buy one. Though i would buy one of the larger ones (looked at one taht was $6000. more a tractor t hen lawn tractor).

 

uli2000

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2006
1,257
1
71
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
So you're saying Walmart hates Nevada?
I live right in the middle of that hate. My closest Walmart is 180 miles away!
 

uli2000

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2006
1,257
1
71
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
So you're saying Walmart hates Nevada?


There are only two general areas that Walmart can grow into within NV

Reno & Vegas.

The other two spots on the map are small towns that are just able to suport one small store due to the location being crossroads on I80 and north/sourth highways US93 and US95 highway.

Walmart is not going to drop itself in the middle of nothing where there are 40-1000 people only to support them within a 100 mile radius.

Exactly. Winnemucca and Elko only have Walmarts because they are on major interstates. I live in Ely and Some in the town have been trying to get one for years. But we only have 10,000 in a 100 mile radius and Walmart says it wont come for less than 15,000-20,000.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,508
146
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Amused


Show me a Walmart that raised its prices (beyond the rate of inflation) after the competition failed to compete and closed.

Hasn't happened.

They do it by lowering the quality of the brand. You cannot sell quality year after year and not raise prices.

Walmart sells the SAME brands of household goods as any other store. The percentage of products made in China at a Walmart is no more than any other discount store. What an absurd reason to pay more for the same damn stuff.


Walmart is the biggest retailer of goods made outside the USA. So I choose to support USA companies as much as I can. And yes that may mean paying more. The attitude of "an absurd reason to pay more for the same damn stuff" is the reason why many USA companies went under. People putting price over loyalty.


Fact: Walmart's business plan has enabled it to sell THE SAME GOODS to people at much lower prices. This brings a HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE to the poorest among us. Capitalism is about competition. FREE trade, not fair trade. You do not cut the legs off all the football players so that the legless player can compete. Just as you do not limit Walmart's growth and perfectly LEGAL business practices just so small business owners with 100 year old business models can compete.

Some goods it does sell lower, and that does help some people. The problem is it is not fair trade when walmart uses its weight to push out the competition among manufacturers. Which it has done since Sam Walton died.

Would you rather cut your shopping bill by a third and have sh!tty service, or pay a third more and have personalized service? If you choose the later, you have the LUXURY of doing so. But what of the single mother of 4 who scrubs toilets for a living? I guess she's just supposed to do without because you think she deserves better service over a higher standard of living, right?

What makes you think it cost a third more for personalized service ? That single mother of four, does just fine here without walmart. You are talking like walmart is a public service to the poor. They are not. They take away far more jobs than they create and lower the quality of the merchandise available. What good is a product at walmart if I buy it then have to buy it again within a month because it broke ? If you are living paycheck to paycheck that works out to making monthly payments to walmart.


1. Huh? They sell SOME lower quality goods at LOWER prices and that helps lower income people.

I see you cannot provide an example of Walmart moving into an area and raising prices after some or all of the competition close. Good try at clouding your original bullsh!t with all new bullsh!t, though.

2. "Biggest retailer of goods made outside the USA." Now THERE is a stat just MADE to inflame the hearts and minds of the non-thinking knee-jerkers. Of COURSE they are the "Biggest retailer of goods made outside the USA" For the VERY SIMPLE fact that they are the BIGGEST RETAILER PERIOD.

Now pay close attention here and try not to hurt yourself: The TRUE stat that will tell us if Walmart is really the evil traitor everyone makes it out to be is this: What percentage of the over all goods they sell is foreign made? Then compare that to the same stats from other discount big box stores AND the smaller stores. OOPS!!! Wait!! You mean other stores sell roughly the same percentage of imported goods as Walmart??? OMG!!!

3. "Fair trade" is a myth. I see that now you're not even reading before you respond. Fair trade simply means disabling the successful so the unsuccessful can compete. How is that "fair" to the successful? FREE trade is the key to a healthy economy and giving the consumer what they really want. "Fair trade" is just jargon for the liberal elitists to micro manage the market and punish the most competitive and thus most successful.

Life isn't fair and neither should trade be fair. It should be free. It cannot be free if you cripple the most successful to give the uncompetitive a leg up and call it "fair."

4. Wait... first you whine that Walmart drives the competition out by offering lower prices, then you deny that the other stores have higher prices. Make up your fscking mind already.

That single mother of four does BETTER when she can not only save considerable money on the very same household goods and foods she bought for considerably more at the uncompetitive mom-and pop stores... but can also buy items she could never afford before that may be lower quality, but are finally affordable to her for the first time. Also, give me valid proof that the lower quality products last only a "month." Or even a short enough time that they are not economically viable choices for those with lower income.

That $119 mower (the cheapest powered mower Walmart sells now) will give her a higher quality of life and she will not be forced to go beg or buy your damn leavings at a yard sale. It also comes with a 2 year warranty. So give me proof that Walmart's low priced lawn mowers break down with such frequency that they need to be replaced in a "month" or even in half the time a mower priced twice as much.

At least now she can HAVE A MOWER. She can buy that TV. She can have a microwave. Why? Because Walmart sells cheaper made and thus cheaper priced quality of life products that she can afford.

People used to think like you when manufacturers started making appliances cheaper with a shorter lifespan so the middle and lower classes could afford them. You see, they USED to make ALL refrigerators, washers and vacuums like tanks that would last decades until they realized that they were pricing the products so high, the cost was far too much of the average person's income to afford. People like you back then bitched and moaned that they were selling "cheap crap" and didn't care that these products were FINALLY available to the masses. Your exact attitude back in the 50s and 60s when the change happened and hard goods became cheaper built and easier to afford: The masses were doing just fine without refrigeration, washing machines, vacuums and mowers, dammit!!! Just change "masses" to poor and we have you.

You STILL have access to higher end goods. Why the fsck do you care if Walmart makes cheaper built and easier to afford quality of life goods available to the poorest among us???

Now, I know elitists like yourself say "she's doing just fine without saving money and getting items she never could afford before." But when you really think about it, just who the fsck are you to judge how she's doing? Who the fsck are you to dictate what store she may shop at simply by zoning them out??? And who the fsck are you to give her a LOWER quality of life by forcing her to spend more for the same damn goods simply because you hate Walmart for it's successful business model?

Finally, why do I say a third? Recently, an everyday item I buy at County Market grocery store, Walgreens and CVS was $3 and change at all these places. It was a full dollar cheaper when I saw it at Walmart. This was no sale, it was the everyday price. It's the same with many everyday items that are EXACTLY the same products. The latest happened to be Glade oil candle refills.