Amused
Elite Member
- Apr 14, 2001
- 57,347
- 19,508
- 146
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Well, Walmart does have a habit of taking brands and "diluting" the quality of the product. Corners are cut, cheaper parts are used, all so more can be made and sold faster. In the end, the product brand name suffers.
Snapper did the right thing. I personally equated Snapper with durability (there's a 35 year old Snapper mower in our family that my grandfather originally bought). If that brand were sold through Walmart (or hell, any other major retailer) I'd be sad, simply because I know that things would change.
Change is good a lot of the time, in the case of Walmart I can't say that it is.
You cannot argue that they value money over quality and service, and these were the principles that Mr. Walton wanted Walmart to carry.
If he still lived I imagine Walmart would have taken a much different direction. A more "Lets keep our product manufacturing local" mentality. As it stands Walmart weilds so much power over manufacturers that they can make or break them. The current Walmart will dictate if XYZ is made in the USA or in a warehouse in Tiawan for pennies/dollars less.
Walmart actually has/had the ability to help steer the direction of our economy. I personally think they've helped devalue the dollar (along with the rest of us and our poor financial choices)
to be fair if you expect a $99 lawnmower from walmart to be the same quality as one purchased from a lawn and one purchased (for far more) from a lawn store you are nieve.
If you mean me directly, am I that nieve? Then no, I'm not. I wasn't implying that I thought that or expected it. If you mean the buying consumer in general, then yeah, I disagree with you there. There are MANY people I know that think the one they get at Walmart is the same thing you get at the higher end store.
but the case of pepsi, tube of toothpase, mac and cheese, etc is the same as the one in Target or jewel store.
BUT yes they do have manufactures produce a special series for them. usually useing cheaper goods (looked at a rideing lawnmower at walmart that had a lot of plastic compared to the one from Lowe's).
And doing this makes products that the poorest among us could never dream owning now affordable to them.
Walmart is not a high end store. They never claimed to be. What they HAVE claimed is to offer the lowest price possible on the products they sell.
The vast majority of what Walmart sells is the same damn thing you can buy anywhere else. On the LUXURY (electronics, furniture and small appliances) items, they offer lower end products at price points never seen before.
And here we go back to the single mother of 4: So WHAT if the mower she bought is of lower quality??? For the first time in her income bracket she could AFFORD a mower. What is wrong with offering lower end products to people who previously could never dream of even owning such things???
When I bought my lawn tractor did I go to Walmart? No, I am able to AFFORD a high end product so I went where those are sold. I also did not bitch that Walmart sells lower end products. Why should I? I know that there are people out there who can't afford anything else and I would never dream of hating Walmart simply because they offer these items.
I still cannot understand all the bitching over a store that has offered the opportunity for poorest among us to own items they previously never dreamed they could afford.
I wasn't really bitching about Walmart, only pointing out the obvious. I'm not sure why you're so worked up over this, but it sounds like you're about to have a stroke. I don't argue that Walmart hasn't done some good. It's just the bad far out weighs the good at this point, and had better executive decisions been made earlier on this might not be the case.
Yes, you give the single mom the chance to finally own the lawn mower she needed, that's great. I live in SC, so I see plenty of examples for your argument.
However, in the end, Walmart fucks the lower class in any given area by bringing down wages, so you do the math.
How does Walmart bring down wages??? They pay about average for a non-skilled retail job AND they bring more jobs to an area. Do you honestly think the bag boy at the run-down "mom and pop" store was making more than he did at Walmart???
No, I'm not about to have a stroke. I am just trying to point out that Walmart has brought a far better quality of life to the poorest among us. I have done the math. And I did it without reading anti-capitalist ranters who mindlessly hate anything that is the most successful. Be it Walmart, AOL or Microsoft. They are as predictable as trained dogs.
If Walmart wasn't a decent employer, they couldn't find employees. If Walmart didn't offer what people wanted, they couldn't find customers. Period.
Only the elitist sits back and tells the people they are too stupid to make their own choices and that they, the elitist, must make them for them. The elitist cannot STAND that Walmart is popular enough among both it's customers and employees that it has become wildly successful. In fact, it seems the elitist cannot stand anything that is wildly successful for that matter.