The GQP is a clear and present danger

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,397
136
It's time to end this experiment. Let us cut the cancer that is the South from the Union. Let the other red states join them, and move on.

Women's rights - down the toilet.
Voting rights - down the toilet.
Fascism - being embraced openly by the GQP.
Trumpism - a belief system based on lying as much as possible. Embraced.
Delegitimizing Democracy - check check check.

There is no other solution. It's time to split the country in two and cut our losses.

Moved from OT to P&N
Exterous
Moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
Reactions: pcgeek11

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,397
136
P&N is the other way bro....did you get lost and take a wrong turn?
I did. Posting while gaming leads to errors.

Mods please move this thread.

Hey, aren't you the oblivious independent that thinks Trump hasn't tried to undermine, delegitimize and overthrow democracy?
 

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,078
2,772
136
Better to have a conflicting parties than mono-party rule of any sort, especially for the biggest purse in the land.
 

bbhaag

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2011
7,447
3,041
146
I did. Posting while gaming leads to errors.

Mods please move this thread.

Hey, aren't you the oblivious independent that thinks Trump hasn't tried to undermine, delegitimize and overthrow democracy?
I figured as much....happens to me to. haha

But no, I'm the oblivious independent that likes to remind arrogant and condescending assholes like you that you're an arrogant and condescending asshole.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,397
136
I figured as much....happens to me to. haha

But no, I'm the oblivious independent that likes to remind arrogant and condescending assholes like you that you're an arrogant and condescending asshole.

Nah dude. Your just ign'nt.

Your posts in p&n show a total lack of understanding of the reality of the GQP party.

Being called arrogant by you is a compliment. My awareness may come across as arrogant, and that's ok. So thanks. I will sleep easier tonight
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,443
33,144
136
Better to have a conflicting parties than mono-party rule of any sort, especially for the biggest purse in the land.
We will never have one party rule unless our voting system is changed. If one party cannot win anymore, it will have to change or it will be replaced. It is the inevitable result of first-past-the-post systems like ours.

Oddly enough, the GOP is doing everything it can to rig the current system in its favor. It cannot win without more and more institutionalized thumbs on the scale for them. They've lost the popular vote 7 of the last 8 times for President. The Democrats can't maintain a majority in the House without winning the popular vote by 3-5%. Shameful. I don't even like Democrats all that much but anyone that hasn't voted for them like their lives have depended on it for the past 2 decades either isn't paying attention or has scrambled eggs in their skull.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
I'm fully in favor of splitting the country but I don't really know how it's even possible. Where would you draw a line on the map to make two fully contiguous countries with all red states in one and all blue states in another? And what happens to the purple states?
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
I'm fully in favor of splitting the country but I don't really know how it's even possible. Where would you draw a line on the map to make two fully contiguous countries with all red states in one and all blue states in another? And what happens to the purple states?

We can just take the PNW and NE states + Cali and be annexed by Canada. Give the rest to Freedumville. Most of us wanted better health care plans anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
We can just take the PNW and NE states + Cali and be annexed by Canada. Give the rest to Freedumville. Most of us wanted better health care plans anyway.

Who gets the nuclear arsenal? I sure as shit wouldn't want them to get any of it. They'd be more likely to use it than N. Korea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,473
2,405
136
Logistically impossible.

The vast majority of people wouldn't have the means to pack up and move to their preferred country, find new employment, etc. It would be a humanitarian and housing crisis.

And that's nothing to say of how to divide infrastructure, law enforcement/military, healthcare providers, etc. How do you maintain basic shipping lines? And probably a hundred other issues we haven't even considered yet.

I think we are stuck with our future GOP overlords.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Easier fix is national vote(or enough states opting into an EC popular vote wall that's effectively a national vote) and brining PR and DC into statehood. At least balance things a bit.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Easier fix is national vote(or enough states opting into an EC popular vote wall that's effectively a national vote) and brining PR and DC into statehood. At least balance things a bit.
And consideration of adjustments to the senate in similar ways to equalize representation instead of continuing to give Republicans over representation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
@gothuevos makes a good point. I actually had no idea we had IDPs in the US until I looked at some charts a while back. With Ida rolling through we'll have even more. The concept of IDPs in the US sounds almost too foreign to be true, but here we are.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
And consideration of adjustments to the senate in similar ways to equalize representation instead of continuing to give Republicans over representation.

But TheVrolok, those 2 million people between ND/SD/WY and their 6 senate votes are constitutionally entitled to the same voting power as the 70+ million people in NY, CA, and IL.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,397
136
Logistically impossible.

The vast majority of people wouldn't have the means to pack up and move to their preferred country, find new employment, etc. It would be a humanitarian and housing crisis.

And that's nothing to say of how to divide infrastructure, law enforcement/military, healthcare providers, etc. How do you maintain basic shipping lines? And probably a hundred other issues we haven't even considered yet.

I think we are stuck with our future GOP overlords.
I refuse to concede that we have to be stuck with the fascist regressives. There may be blood but we must remove the cancer
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pcgeek11
Nov 29, 2006
15,908
4,486
136
I dont see splitting the country ever working. Even if we some how did, 100 years down the road we’d probably be back in the same boat, wanting to split again from the crazies of the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
16,387
11,310
136
I dont see splitting the country ever working. Even if we some how did, 100 years down the road we’d probably be back in the same boat, wanting to split again from the crazies of the world.

Why do people get divorced?

10 years down the line.. will they probably want another divorce?

Is that the reason you should always stay in a marriage no matter what even if you're going insane and not even treated as a human being?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,429
3,213
146
Solidly progressive state residents need to make a project of moving to either turn the least populated red states or the closest purple states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uclaLabrat

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,397
136
Countries split up, countries are created. Look at the Soviet Union. Yugoslavia. This is not unprecedented.

It may be bloody. But when you have a cancer as bad and as deep as the GQP, the painful treatment must happen.

It would be better for many millions to not live under fascist regressive rule in the new Union, and millions of others that are left in the Confederacy unwillingly, to at least have an option of moving to the Union of sanity that would remain.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Easier fix is national vote(or enough states opting into an EC popular vote wall that's effectively a national vote) and brining PR and DC into statehood. At least balance things a bit.
Progresshevik's utopia. Expand the Supreme Court, add members to Congress, and Gerrymandering by unchecked immigration.