Now comes the part of this article I have been dreading since properly concluding an expansive article such as this one is a lesson in futility. With the wide selection of GPUs available coupled with some great competition in certain price brackets, choosing a GPU has never been so difficult. At the same time, this Christmas season has some truly hot games which are begging to be played at their highest possible settings. Couple that with a truly volatile pricing structure which has made my head spin, and it is understandable that consumers would like a helping hand when it comes to choosing their next big purchase.
So, now that we have seen all the benchmarks, which card is the best bet for you this holiday season? Start writing the hate mail because the answer to this is: there is no ?best? card. Why? Because even though one manufacturer may perform well in one game, the same can?t be said across the board. Take for example the performance of the HD 4870 512MB Need for Speed Undercover; it is simply amazing. However, on the flip side of the coin that same HD 4870 didn't perform up to expectations in Call of Duty: World at War. There is a lot of back and forth throughout the games tested here which is why you should really take a look at this article as a set of individual reviews instead of expecting an overall winner to be declared.
Even though I will shy away from naming a ?best of the best? card for every situation, some mention has to be made of certain cards which stood out for either their value and performance or lack thereof. First and foremost comes the Übermensch HD 4870 X2 that will cost you an arm, a leg and a testicle but provides blisteringly fast performance?as long as ATI?s driver team could work their magic. Unfortunately, it couldn?t keep up in all instances since work still needs to be done on Crossfire implementation in some games but when it worked like it was supposed to, nothing could touch it. We will stay with the high end since if there was one overriding disappointment in this whole article it was the performance of the GTX 280. Overall, its performance was within spitting distance (think 10%) of a GTX 260 216 sporting minor overclocks while retailing for significantly more. It seems like Nvidia backed their high-end card into a corner while trying to compete with the HD 4870 512MB and 1GB cards since with the new GTX 260 around, the thought of $500+ spent on a GTX 280 is less than appealing.
As we come down into the sub-$400 price category, things become even less clearly defined. If one of the standouts has to be our GTX 260 with 216 SPs since it provides great performance right across the board. Indeed, I would even recommend an overclocked GTX 260 216 over a GTX 280 considering how close the two cards are performance-wise. Since you will probably ask; the HD 4870 1GB really doesn?t hold much sway for me considering more often than not it can barely keep a lead over its 512MB brother yet it costs quite a bit more. Its price premium is completely unjustified unless you are playing at ultra high resolutions with every imaginable IQ bang and whistle enabled. However, you still have to take into account that the extra memory does have its uses and for all we know, 1GB could become the standard in the not so distant future. Only time will tell.
Interestingly, with the inclusion of the HD 4870 1GB into the lineup at the $350 to $400 mark and the discontinuation of the standard GTX 260, the HD 4870 512MB sits all on its own in the $250 to $300 price bracket. Basically if you are looking for a $275 card and don?t have the cash to bump up to a GTX 260 216, you should be happy with your single option because let me tell you; it is a perfect choice.
The 9800 GTX+ has stolen much of the HD 4850?s initial performance thunder over the non ?+? model but that doesn?t stop the ATI card from performing admirably in many of the games. Pricing for the HD 4850 is also quite attractive which had a positive impact on its price per FPS numbers and another reason why people will be drawn to it. To be honest, this race around the $200 price mark is far too close to call considering the two cards trade blows like a pair of prize fighters without either being able to deliver a knockout punch.
To sum this all up I really have to say that even though the card you pick will come down to the games you are most interested in playing this holiday season, there are still some safe bets while others will have you spending money for minuscule performance increases. Just remember: buy according to budget instead of expecting the impossible from a higher-end product.
Stay tuned for Part two of this article which will show the performance of cards in the sub-$220 price categories. Until then; happy gaming.
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread
Facebook
Twitter