- Aug 13, 2009
- 4,269
- 1
- 71
After coming in billions over budget, and a decade or so late the new bridge span is proving to be worse than the section it originally replaced. LOL!
It has been plagued with so many issues that now its seismic viability is being questioned and it just might end up being less seismically fit to withstand a major earthquake then the previous span it replaced.
"Plague of problems puts Bay Bridge seismic safety in question"
Click on the link to continue reading.
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Plague-of-problems-puts-Bay-Bridge-seismic-safety-6253577.php
Of note the older span needed retrofitting but apparently political forces wanted it completely replaced because it was "ugly" and people trotted out the fallacy of infrastructure spending being the end all, and be all of government spending.
So here we are with a bridge span that was over budget by BILLIONS of dollars and came in a decade late and which is today basically a defective piece of infrastructure. Meanwhile the destruction of the old span it replaced is continuing. I wonder however if they (Caltrans and local leaders) are having second thoughts? Hmmm...its probably too late to rebuild the old span to replace the disaster that is this "NEW AND IMPROVED" bridge span.
It has been plagued with so many issues that now its seismic viability is being questioned and it just might end up being less seismically fit to withstand a major earthquake then the previous span it replaced.
"Plague of problems puts Bay Bridge seismic safety in question"

Californians spent $6.4 billion to replace the old Bay Bridge eastern span because it was unlikely to survive a major earthquake. Now, mounting revelations of construction problems are calling into question whether the new bridge can withstand the Big One..
Click on the link to continue reading.
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Plague-of-problems-puts-Bay-Bridge-seismic-safety-6253577.php
Of note the older span needed retrofitting but apparently political forces wanted it completely replaced because it was "ugly" and people trotted out the fallacy of infrastructure spending being the end all, and be all of government spending.
So here we are with a bridge span that was over budget by BILLIONS of dollars and came in a decade late and which is today basically a defective piece of infrastructure. Meanwhile the destruction of the old span it replaced is continuing. I wonder however if they (Caltrans and local leaders) are having second thoughts? Hmmm...its probably too late to rebuild the old span to replace the disaster that is this "NEW AND IMPROVED" bridge span.

Last edited: