• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Fed loans half trillion dollars to foreign banks

GeezerMan

Platinum Member
Link

I guess 500 billion is just not that big of a deal anymore. I saw this on a video, and Bernanke looks arrogant. I like this Congressman Grayson.


Alan Grayson is a Democratic Congressman representing Florida's 8th congressional district. He was elected in 2008, having beaten the 4-term Republican incumbent. Despite his freshman status, Grayson is already developing a reputation as a fierce advocate for taxpayer interests in the wake of massive bailouts of the financial sector that have been orchestrated by the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve. Serving on the Financial Services Committee and subcommittee that deals with capital markets, the congressman, having been a successful entrepreneur, clearly knows how to read a balance sheet and ask relevant questions. Thus, the stage was set when the Florida congressman had the opportunity to question Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke when the latter appeared before Congress to present an update on the economic crisis gripping America and much of the world.

Congressman Grayson demanded details from Bernanke on a half trillion dollars in liquidity swaps to foreign central banks undertaken by the Federal Reserve, apparently under the radar and in the dead of night. Demonstrating that he and his staff had done their fact-checking, Grayson noted that in 2007 these swaps with overseas central banks were a mere $24 billion, but had swelled to a staggering $553 billion in 2008 with the onset of the Global Economic Crisis.

The exchange between Grayson and Bernanke appears almost Kafkaesque in its reality-defying character, conveyed in the following, as a clearly uncomfortable Fed Chairman provides a tortured explanation regarding this half trillion dollar transaction:



Bernanke: "Those are swaps that were done with foreign central banks..."
Grayson: "So who got the money?"
Bernanke: "Financial institutions in Europe and other countries..."
Grayson: "Which ones?"
Bernanke: "I don't know."
Grayson: "Half a trillion dollars and you don't know who got the money?"
Bernanke: "Um, um, the loans go to the central banks and they then put them out to their institutions..."


Half a trillion dollars is a number so grandiose, it defies comprehension unless it is reduced to its ultimate simplicity. These credit swaps that exchanged American dollars for various foreign currencies were done without any consultation with elected officials, and amount to more than $1,800 for every man, woman and child residing in the United States. Under section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act, according to Chairman Bernanke, the Fed's Open Market Committee (FOMC) can engage in swapping U.S. dollars with foreign central banks without any limitations, at any time, without any requirement for congressional scrutiny. In other words, "Congressman Grayson, why are you wasting my valuable time with these irrelevant questions," Bernanke seemed to be implying through his frosty demeanor. Never mind that the Federal Reserve Act was originally passed in 1913, nearly a century ago.

"Is it safe to say that nobody in 1913 contemplated that a small little group of people would decide to hand out half a trillion dollars to foreigners," Grayson pointed out. He raised as an example New Zealand, which received $9 billion from the Federal Reserve, an amount equal to $3,000 for every one of that nation's citizens.

The congressman from Florida's 8th district is to be commended for his focused inquiries directed at the Fed Chairman, and steadfastness in the face of Bernanke's evasiveness. More importantly, Grayson raises anew serious questions regarding the unlimited power placed in the hands of the Federal Reserve. The defenders of the Fed's current position of fiscal omnipotence maintain that its independence from political influence must be preserved.

However, the historical record, especially in the last 20 years, clearly shows that the Federal Reserve is influenced politically, either through the executive branch and the power of the President to reappoint the Fed Chairman, or through the large financial institutions on Wall Street, which have a level of access to Fed decision-making not available to any other category of citizens. More importantly, since the onset of the current financial and economic crisis, the Federal Reserve and its chairman have proven to be highly fallible, having made many errors in judgment, not the least being their original overly-optimistic pronouncements when the first tremors from the sub-prime meltdown arose.

Congressman Grayson's penetrating inquiry serves as a reminder that the ultimate systemic risk to America's financial system and economic superstructure stems from allowing a small, fallible clique to make speedy decisions involving incalculable sums of public money without any consultation with or checks and balances from the nation's elected representatives. This is not only fiscal tyranny by any other name; it is a recipe for unintended and disastrous consequences.

------------------------------
Title changed from gives to loans

Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy
 
Originally posted by: GeezerMan
Link

I guess 500 billion is just not that big of a deal anymore. I saw this on a video, and Bernanke looks arrogant. I like this Congressman Grayson.

See signature. He probably doesn't care what happens to sums under a trillion. I mean, if it doesn't even match 10% of what he has recently spent, I don't see why he'd bother to notice.
 
Yeesh, currency swaps are nothing new, don't see what the big deal is. I bet Japan got a lot of these; few months back there was a huge run on the Japanese yen with the unwinding of carry trade.
 
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Yeesh, currency swaps are nothing new, don't see what the big deal is. I bet Japan got a lot of these; few months back there was a huge run on the Japanese yen with the unwinding of carry trade.

Soros did this to the the British Pound and he is positioned himself to do it to the Dollar.

Good times.
 
I don't know if I should laugh or feel sorry for some people's ignorance here. Do you people even know what a currency/liquidity swap is? It is just a simple way to put more USD in the market to make sure there is enough USD around for people who need it. Foreign central bank put xyz amount of foreign currency in Fed account, Fed give foreign central bank equivalent USD based on market exchange rate. Also a contract is in place to reverse the transaction with the same exchange rate in a set future date.

The USD is not "given" to anybody. There is no profit/loss. Just simple transaction to temporary put USD in the international market so people can get a hold of USD for transactions they need. Why the sudden increase to 1/2 trillion? Maybe you heard about the crisis reducing the USD out there and the Fed need to boost the USD availability a little?

You fed hater really need to do some homework before you attack with some laughable charges.....it really shows how ignorant you guys are. I know you people don't have a clue what swap, liquidity and other simple economic terms and concepts are. But at least know what you are talking about before you throw $hit around.
 
Originally posted by: rchiu
I don't know if I should laugh or feel sorry for some people's ignorance here. Do you people even know what a currency/liquidity swap is? It is just a simple way to put more USD in the market to make sure there is enough USD around for people who need it. Foreign central bank put xyz amount of foreign currency in Fed account, Fed give foreign central bank equivalent USD based on market exchange rate. Also a contract is in place to reverse the transaction with the same exchange rate in a set future date.

The USD is not "given" to anybody. There is no profit/loss. Just simple transaction to temporary put USD in the international market so people can get a hold of USD for transactions they need. Why the sudden increase to 1/2 trillion? Maybe you heard about the crisis reducing the USD out there and the Fed need to boost the USD availability a little?

You fed hater really need to do some homework before you attack with some laughable charges.....it really shows how ignorant you guys are. I know you people don't have a clue what swap, liquidity and other simple economic terms and concepts are. But at least know what you are talking about before you throw $hit around.

all of this is why I kinda don't want congress getting involved in the fed. At least I know I don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to high finance. It's the people who do that are dangerous.
 
Originally posted by: rchiu
I don't know if I should laugh or feel sorry for some people's ignorance here. Do you people even know what a currency/liquidity swap is? It is just a simple way to put more USD in the market to make sure there is enough USD around for people who need it. Foreign central bank put xyz amount of foreign currency in Fed account, Fed give foreign central bank equivalent USD based on market exchange rate. Also a contract is in place to reverse the transaction with the same exchange rate in a set future date.

The USD is not "given" to anybody. There is no profit/loss. Just simple transaction to temporary put USD in the international market so people can get a hold of USD for transactions they need. Why the sudden increase to 1/2 trillion? Maybe you heard about the crisis reducing the USD out there and the Fed need to boost the USD availability a little?

You fed hater really need to do some homework before you attack with some laughable charges.....it really shows how ignorant you guys are. I know you people don't have a clue what swap, liquidity and other simple economic terms and concepts are. But at least know what you are talking about before you throw $hit around.

I feel bad for Bernanke having to put up with goofballs like the guy in the video that don't know what a currency swap is and why it's not a problem.
 
Surely congress can find a qualified group of people who are not connected to the revolving door of big money, the Fed, Goldman Sachs, etc. who do nothing but review and audit the Fed.

Make it a full time job for them, but subject them to audits as well. Corruption at that level is very alluring. Maybe a specialized group within the GAO.
 
Its not like they lent the money to publicly or privately owned banks. They lent the money to central banks of other governments.
 
"Congressman Grayson demanded details from Bernanke on a half trillion dollars in liquidity swaps to foreign central banks undertaken by the Federal Reserve ..."

The above is from the link...
A swap, it seems to me, is a something for something... In the case of Liquidity swaps it used to be a way of keeping the US $ empowered as the Universal currency that Nations would denominate international transactions in.. Like oil etc. Usually, The banks would trade their currency for some Dollars at the current market value of the transaction... This to enable the various Central Banks to provide liquidity in dollar denominated transactions...
I guess I'm sort of confused by the Congressman's questions... How would the Fed chairman know the end disposition of the various swaps... and why is it even an issue to provide liquidity to other nation central banks...

Perhaps he was really asking for the details of how the Fed intended to insure the swapped assets maintained their relative value vis a vis the dollars swapped.. or some thing..

OR... maybe I'm just getting old and senile... ah well... such is life..
 
Damn, the Huffington Post is so terrible sometimes. Why would the Fed keep track of a foreign bank's loans?
 
Originally posted by: Evan
Damn, the Huffington Post is so terrible sometimes. Why would the Fed keep track of a foreign bank's loans?

Is the Huffington Post usually a good source? I'm having a hard time comprehending how this article even got published since it's so blatantly erroneous and is serving to do nothing except for to grossly misinform the public.
 
What's a rather silly question; the money is owed to us by the european central bank, what they do after they get it isn't our business. That's like the bank asking me where the mortgage money went and asking me to document every nail
 
It sounds like a reasonable practice but where did this money come from to swap with? The half trillion had to come from somewhere didn't it? Or did the fed just print it or made it so? Or do they make a deal with US banks to pull back US funds in exchange for European funds?
 
^ Good link. Here's the pertinent information from their FAQ about where the half a trillion went and who keeps track of it:

How do foreign central banks distribute the U.S. dollar funding they receive through these swaps?
The foreign central banks distribute the U.S. dollars they draw through a variety of methods, including variable-rate tenders, fixed-rate tenders, bilateral transactions, and foreign exchange swap tenders against various types of collateral, including both foreign currency and securities denominated in foreign currency. In each case, the arrangement is between the foreign central bank and the institutions obtaining the funding in these operations. The foreign central banks determine the acceptability of the collateral offered and the eligibility of the institutions to participate in the operations they conduct. The terms on which funds are tendered are released to the public by the foreign central banks. The Federal Reserve's contractual relationship is with the foreign central bank and not with the institutions obtaining dollar funding in these operations.
 
Originally posted by: Drakkon
It sounds like a reasonable practice but where did this money come from to swap with? The half trillion had to come from somewhere didn't it? Or did the fed just print it or made it so? Or do they make a deal with US banks to pull back US funds in exchange for European funds?

Idea of "printing" money is out dated, everything is done electronically these days. Fed doesn't create those money, foreign central banks have to deposit equivalent foreign currency at Fed first, so those USD is essentially backed by those central bank's currency. And since a contract is created for those central banks to buy back their currency at original exchange rate, you don't have to worry about exchange rate movement. In fact, Fed will make some market interest rate on those USD swapped.

So Fed's asset doesn't change at all with this type of transaction, nothing is "created out of thin air". The only difference is the amount of USD circulated in the market, that will depend on how foreign central bank use those USD and if they release it into their own market.
 
Back
Top