The Cognitive Decline Disinformation Campaign Being Launched Against Biden

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,849
136
We had an Iran nuclear deal that according to the IAEA was working. Guess who ended it?
It's always funny how people think it's a credible threat where a group says 'we're mad about your support for Israel therefore we're going to help elect the guy who wants to deport us'.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,968
3,956
136
Yea, Trump is only slightly younger than Biden, but he seems much more vigorous. He has one advantage, in that if he says something stupid, it just seems like his normal ranting, not necessarily that he is losing it.

I had no idea the definition of vigorous was "can be easily defeated by a ramp."
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
Trump as vigorous as your drunk grandpa stumbling around at a family gathering and won't stfu about how the whole world is out to get him while eyeing his own grand daughter mumbling about how she's grown.
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,537
2,424
136
Have you gone back and looked at polls at the same time during Obamas reelection? Numbers were close to the same. How did that turn out?

I get what you're saying but 2012 was another lifetime ago in terms of the political landscape.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,588
4,239
136
I love how he genuinely thinks that exercise uses up your body’s finite supply of energy like he’s Spawn or something.
He does need to preserve his energy to keep cheating on his wife.

ondma is so full of shit that a big city's sewage treatment plant must be jealous. He blames Joe Biden for anything and everything, and when called out on it, says it doesn't matter who's at fault. Guess who he's voting for again in 2024? :tearsofjoy:
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,879
6,416
126
For the thousandth time, Bernie Sanders will never be POTUS.
America is already dealing with massive antisemitism from the right-wing (disingenuously disguised as anti-globalism). So much so that leading right-wing figures are celebrated for retweeting the equivalent of "Jews will not replace us" by mainstream GOP.
Meanwhile, anti-socialist sentiment from the right-wing is so extreme that even our country's founding principle, the proposition that all persons are created equal in the eyes of the law, is denounced as socialism.
And yet, somehow starry-eyed dreamers still believe a socialist Jew will be elected POTUS in this environment.
Many progressives continue to fail to understand that progress is incremental by definition. And that every time well-meaning progressives try to move us forward too quickly, they end setting us back that much further.

So what, Biden couldn't win until he did. Bernie won't, because he is not running.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,849
136
So what, Biden couldn't win until he did. Bernie won't, because he is not running.
Biden was the favorite in Democratic primary polling wire to wire:


He was also the favorite to win the general election wire to wire:


Bernie lost the last two Democratic primaries and it was not particularly close. We aren't talking about a crowded field where he didn't get traction, we're talking about where it was a clear choice between him and another Democrat and he lost badly both times. It's not going to happen and wouldn't happen even if he ran again.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,879
6,416
126
Biden was the favorite in Democratic primary polling wire to wire:


He was also the favorite to win the general election wire to wire:


Bernie lost the last two Democratic primaries and it was not particularly close. We aren't talking about a crowded field where he didn't get traction, we're talking about where it was a clear choice between him and another Democrat and he lost badly both times. It's not going to happen and wouldn't happen even if he ran again.

Ok, as it was with Biden.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,588
4,239
136
Bernie's time has past, but he ran a great campaign in 2016. Not sure why you'd say he lost badly when the entire weight of the party was behind Hillary Clinton. Sanders didn't bow out until mid July.

And IIRC, Sanders did pretty well in fictitious head to head polls against DJT. In 2020, Sanders was certainly "electable." In this regard, he's light years ahead of Kamala Harris or even Elizabeth Warren.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandorski

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,849
136
Bernie's time has past, but he ran a great campaign in 2016. Not sure why you'd say he lost badly when the entire weight of the party was behind Hillary Clinton. Sanders didn't bow out until mid July.

And IIRC, Sanders did pretty well in fictitious head to head polls against DJT. In 2020, Sanders was certainly "electable." In this regard, he's light years ahead of Kamala Harris or even Elizabeth Warren.
In terms of 'lost badly' I mean he lost by 12 points in terms of delegates. Maybe he overperformed his fundamentals but the race was not close.

I know he didn't bow out until mid-July, in fact this probably was a contributing factor to Clinton's defeat as it was obviously impossible for him to win since March, and the months of grievance baiting by his supporters made divisions in the party. Clinton, despite being much closer in delegate count, conceded a month earlier.

Once Super Tuesday happened in 2016 Sanders should have conceded as the race was over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,588
4,239
136
Considering Clinton was the anointed one, Sanders ran a fantastic campaign IMO. He got 46% of pledged delegates. I will concede to you that Clinton was never truly threatened in the delegates count, which is all that matters.

And unlike Clinton, Sanders probably would have defeated DJT in 2016 but we don't live in an alternate universe:
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,849
136
Considering Clinton was the anointed one, Sanders ran a fantastic campaign IMO. He got 46% of pledged delegates. I will concede to you that Clinton was never truly threatened in the delegates count, which is all that matters.

And unlike Clinton, Sanders probably would have defeated DJT in 2016 but we don't live in an alternate universe:
I'm skeptical of him outperforming Clinton for one primary (har) reason: he was never subject to significant, sustained attacks. Clinton, knowing she had won, was trying not to antagonize his supporters further, and Republicans of course were happy to see him stay in as long as possible. I personally think Sanders has significant vulnerabilities that would have become more prominent and dragged him down if he were the nominee. Sort of like how the most popular guy in town is the second string quarterback.

I like Bernie - I would have happily voted for him had he been the nominee. I am skeptical of his electoral strength in a nationwide election though, but as you mention this isn't Star Trek so there's no Goateed Bernie in a mirror universe to run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Considering Clinton was the anointed one, Sanders ran a fantastic campaign IMO. He got 46% of pledged delegates. I will concede to you that Clinton was never truly threatened in the delegates count, which is all that matters.

And unlike Clinton, Sanders probably would have defeated DJT in 2016 but we don't live in an alternate universe:
No, he would not have. Bernie would have been fucking McGoverned by Trump in a landslide. It would have been a complete catastrophe for the Dems (and America overall IMO).
I do not know exactly why Berniebros keep clinging to this idiotic notion that Bernie would have defeated Trump when he couldn't even come close to beating Hillary, but I assume it's to assuage their guilt for their involvement in helping get Trump elected.
 
Last edited:

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,337
31,414
136
Considering Clinton was the anointed one, Sanders ran a fantastic campaign IMO. He got 46% of pledged delegates. I will concede to you that Clinton was never truly threatened in the delegates count, which is all that matters.

And unlike Clinton, Sanders probably would have defeated DJT in 2016 but we don't live in an alternate universe:
Bless your heart
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,588
4,239
136
This is all hypothetical conjecture, but I'd bet Bernie would have done a lot better in the Rust Belt Blue Wall that lost Hillary the election. The voters that ditched Hillary are specifically the voters that Bernie appeals to (White, working class men). I'm not a Bernie bro, but the polling evidence we have is that he was very competitive with DJT. Considering Trump has never come close to winning 50% of any national election, how exactly does he destroy Bernie?

I've never personally cast a primary ballot for Bernie and although I like him, I don't know that he was ever amongst my top choices unless you count runner-up in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandorski

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
This is all hypothetical conjecture, but I'd bet Bernie would have done a lot better in the Rust Belt Blue Wall that lost Hillary the election. The voters that ditched Hillary are specifically the voters that Bernie appeals to (White, working class men). I'm not a Bernie bro, but the polling evidence we have is that he was very competitive with DJT. Considering Trump has never come close to winning 50% of any national election, how exactly does he destroy Bernie?

I've never personally cast a primary ballot for Bernie and although I like him, I don't know that he was ever amongst my top choices unless you count runner-up in 2016.
Dude, this is crazy out of touch. Those 'white working class men' stayed home in 2012 and let a black man get re-elected because their party nominated a Mormon. There was no way they were going to vote for the socialist Jew when they had their White Christian nationalist messiah in Trump.

White working class men in America, very generally speaking, are populist and conservative. They don't want socialism because that would mean all the people they don't like would get free healthcare too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,879
6,416
126
No, he would not have. Bernie would have been fucking McGoverned by Trump in a landslide. It would have been a complete catastrophe for the Dems (and America overall IMO).
I do not know exactly why Berniebros keep clinging to this idiotic notion that Bernie would have defeated Trump when he couldn't even come close to beating Hillary, but I assume it's to assuage their guilt for their involvement in helping get Trump elected.

What would Trump have done? Call him names?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,879
6,416
126
Dude, this is crazy out of touch. Those 'white working class men' stayed home in 2012 and let a black man get re-elected because their party nominated a Mormon. There was no way they were going to vote for the socialist Jew when they had their White Christian champion in Trump.

Bernie is widely respected and trusted.
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,537
2,424
136
Here's you in 2020 saying everything was different then right before Trump lost.


Even 2020 feels like a lifetime ago. Biden capitalized on COVID and general Trump dislike.

At this point, Trump isn't going to lose any voters no matter what else he does, additional indictments, convictions, etc.

But there's plenty of time to get just enough people to continue to sour on Biden. Trump has already hit his floor, Biden, well....he can dig himself deeper.

There's just this general "malaise" among voters with regards to Biden. And a lot of it isn't deserved. But sometimes perception is reality and he should be considered the underdog at this point.

See all you fellow vermin in the camps!