The Brits finally get it ...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
This group isn't banned, it's banned from protesting because of the rioting that ensues every single time. This is equal to yelling fire in a crowded theatre and has nothing to do with freedom nor rights.

No, it's not the same at all. I suspect that this is merely the first step towards a radical program of discrimination and eventual extermination. The masters haven't forgotten their techniques.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
No, it's not the same at all. I suspect that this is merely the first step towards a radical program of discrimination and eventual extermination. The masters haven't forgotten their techniques.

I'll bet you $1000 it won't work this time-- because when their very lives are threatened, and they WILL be by these terrorist Muslims, they will tuck tail and flee.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
No, it's not the same at all. I suspect that this is merely the first step towards a radical program of discrimination and eventual extermination. The masters haven't forgotten their techniques.

True, we haven't forgotten our techniques as Brits who did NOT turn away blacks nor arabs nor jews while the US did. Didn't even have internment camps to starve people to death and have not have torture camps in recent years where people have died...

Damn shame, isn't it?

We should be MORE FREE and torture MORE ARABS DAMMIT!

There are banns for protests and even banned groups (over 10 000 of them ) in the US, but that doesn't matter, if the UK will not allow one group who think they are above the law to protest in a place not designated for the march... well then we are nazists...

Do you understand how fucked in your head you are or do i have to repeat this post?
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Do you understand how fucked in your head you are or do i have to report this post?

See what I did there? (No, I haven't reported you).
If you can't avoid resorting to such personal retorts to make a point, then how strong is your point? It can't stand on its own...
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
I'll bet you $1000 it won't work this time-- because when their very lives are threatened, and they WILL be by these terrorist Muslims, they will tuck tail and flee.

Like the US did in WWII until you were attacked?

We have been attacked once, dealt with that and moved on, when will you do the same?
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
See what I did there? (No, I haven't reported you).

I assume you reported my post because you are so chickenshieit that you couldn't respond to it?

Is that it?

If you get into one of these discussions it's standard policy from the mods that you will have to take the abuse in it.

At least that is from what i have been told.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
True, we haven't forgotten our techniques as Brits who did NOT turn away blacks nor arabs nor jews while the US did. Didn't even have internment camps to starve people to death and have not have torture camps in recent years where people have died...

Damn shame, isn't it?

We should be MORE FREE and torture MORE ARABS DAMMIT!

There are banns for protests and even banned groups (over 10 000 of them ) in the US, but that doesn't matter, if the UK will not allow one group who think they are above the law to protest in a place not designated for the march... well then we are nazists...

Do you understand how fucked in your head you are or do i have to repeat this post?

You must be delusional. The UK is the leader in bloodthirst and genocide, throughout human history. It is quite clear from the political problems in the UK that things will get worse.

It is inevitable that the UK will perform mass genocide against a segment of its population. This country did it to the entire world for hundreds of years. Why stop now? They were the masters of it.
 
Last edited:

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Labour sucks arse, we went to war with I-fucking-raq because GW's ballsweat tasted so great Tony the honey couldn't resist licking it.

Anyway, as long as they are not Indians or Hindus they are probably ok to live in the UK, Hindus are just the worst of the worst, incest and acid burning along with honor killings...

Animals, the lot of them.

When it comes to who are going first, ask and Brit anywhere, the fucking Indians are going first, they are the worst of the worst, Islamics seem bland in comparison.

The caste system is a living bullsheit in the UK and we need to rid ourselves of that first, after that we can go after smaller things like the one in a million Muslim.

Rant all you want, dude. Rational people have figured out who pose the greatest threat to Britain and, indeed, the free world with their homicide bombings, using planes as missiles, sticking bombs in their underwear to bring down a plane etc. and take remedial steps, like mandatory airport searches of passengers from terrorist sympathizing countries like Pakistan. If you want to make yourself instantly radioactive, just introduce yourself as a UK Muslim. That says it all.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Rant all you want, dude. Rational people have figured out who pose the greatest threat to Britain and, indeed, the free world with their homicide bombings, using planes as missiles, sticking bombs in their underwear to bring down a plane etc. and take remedial steps, like mandatory airport searches of passengers from terrorist sympathizing countries like Pakistan. If you want to make yourself instantly radioactive, just introduce yourself as a UK Muslim. That says it all.

+1 well said.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Rant all you want, dude. Rational people have figured out who pose the greatest threat to Britain and, indeed, the free world with their homicide bombings, using planes as missiles, sticking bombs in their underwear to bring down a plane etc. and take remedial steps, like mandatory airport searches of passengers from terrorist sympathizing countries like Pakistan. If you want to make yourself instantly radioactive, just introduce yourself as a UK Muslim. That says it all.

Last terror attack we had was by RIRA and we don't give a sheit about Muslims, they don't bother us and we don't bother them.

Hinus OTOH are uncontrollable, they are just whackjobs... MY CASTE SAYS I MUST BURN MY WIFE ALIVE and all that sheit that happens on a daily basis is our real problem.

Muslims, not so much.

I'm Jewish by heritage, Captain of the TFB, SAS, currently in Afghanistan.

I don't think you have much more to come up with now and yeah, there are plenty on this forum alone who can tell you that i really am me.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
You must be delusional. The UK is the leader in bloodthirst and genocide, throughout human history. It is quite clear from the political problems in the UK that things will get worse.

It is inevitable that the UK will perform mass genocide against a segment of its population. This country did it to the entire world for hundreds of years. Why stop now? They were the masters of it.

No, that would be the Ottoman empire and after them the Romans and after them the Soviets and after them the French and THEN the Brits.

But stay cool knowing nothing, it's SOP for you twats anyway. ;)
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Looks like I shut John down with post #49 in this thread, waiting for you to deal with the facts of history buddy...how about you reply to that one and not just all the others...don't leave me out I want to have fun too...
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
...... we don't give a sheit about Muslims, they don't bother us and we don't bother them.
.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Sorry guys, couldn't resist. That's got to be the quote of the century.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
They won't get it, total chamberlain mode right now. We'll have to pull their asses out the fire a third time when blood starts flowing through their streets.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Except for Muslims, that is the constant yammering, terrorist attack here and terrorist attack there against other Muslims...

True, but that is political and I would argue that those yammering still don't give a shit they are just trying to further their own agenda.
 

grebe925

Member
Feb 22, 2008
88
0
0
Looks like I spoke too soon:

Senior member of extreme Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir teaches at LSE

The London School of Economics is a hotbed of jihadi politics and intervowen with the violence associated with it. Omar Saeed Sheik, the guy who had WSJ reporter Daniel Pearl beheaded, was involved in a rash of kidnapping of Western tourists and also was a money-runner in the 9/11 attacks was radicalized there.

Feel free to shake your head in disbelief.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
I'm also amused by people who have strong opinions from the hearsay they get about the goings-on in distant countries they've probably never even visited.
 

grebe925

Member
Feb 22, 2008
88
0
0
I'm also amused by people who have strong opinions from the hearsay they get about the goings-on in distant countries they've probably never even visited.

You would have thought that, after 9/11, people would have figured out that there are no such places as "distant countries". I mean, Afghanistan was about as distant as it gets, right?
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
They won't get it, total chamberlain mode right now. We'll have to pull their asses out the fire a third time when blood starts flowing through their streets.

A third time? Not in WW1 and not in WW2 or are you saying that not participating means that at least you didn't fight against us? Because when you were declared war upon and attacked you saved your own arses, not ours, not Europes and if they hadn't been stupid enough to declare war upon you never would have gotten involved.

Now tell me the great fable about how you saved millions by nuking Japan because they wouldn't agree to have their emperor step down, something they didn't agree to afterwards either but then it was ok.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Sorry guys, couldn't resist. That's got to be the quote of the century.

As long as you include what IS our biggest problem, you're free to make that quote, pulling it out of context as you have is SOP for you twats but it's never honest.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
You would have thought that, after 9/11, people would have figured out that there are no such places as "distant countries". I mean, Afghanistan was about as distant as it gets, right?

Afghanistan attacked us?!?!?! :eek:
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
True, but that is political and I would argue that those yammering still don't give a shit they are just trying to further their own agenda.

Aye, i can't wait for the upcoming election so we can get rid of the ballsweat licking politicians that are in charge of the UK today.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Afghanistan attacked us?!?!?! :eek:

Sure did, terrists rawr 9/11 Saddam Hussein rawr Osama Bin Laden rawr!

WITH US OR AGAINST US!

NK!

IRAQ!

IRAN!

SA is a-ok though, the good people of SA wouldn't attack the US and that Osama and every fucking member of the AQ at the time of 9/11 were Saudis is just an evil rumor, everyone knows they were Afghani-Iraqis!
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Nope, tens of thousands of NATO forces are currently there for a little R&R.

And here all along I thought they were there because we had tens of thousands of NATO forces sitting around elsewhere with nothing to do!