The Brits finally get it ...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Ignorance is rampant and as a Brit i'm extremely used to that on American forums. You read the headline and nothing else and that's good enough for you to base your opinions on.

Sharia courts settle civil matters as long as both parties agree, it cannot bypass UK law in any way shape or form. Think of it as a lawyers office, they can come to agreement or they can take it up in legal court, that is all that it is.

This group isn't banned, it's banned from protesting because of the rioting that ensues every single time. This is equal to yelling fire in a crowded theatre and has nothing to do with freedom nor rights.

Our biggest problem in the UK is and remains to be the Indians who follow the honor system, that is where you find fathers who burn their daughters with oil or throw them off balconies because they don't marry who they are supposed to, that is where you'll find men murdering their wives rather than granting them divorce, that is where you'll find men burning women with acid because they had the gall to turn them down.

99% if not more of all honor killings or abuses in the UK are Indians trying to follow an archaic rule of caste in the UK.

Of course, they just do it to their own so you don't hear much about it in the worldwide press.

Yup, few people give a shit as long as they are just killing their own people.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Yep, Indians are so pissed off with the British system that doesn't allow them to practice their traditions that they're preaching hatred in their temples, running off for jihad, sticking bombs in their underwear and trying to blow up planes. Sheesh! Talk about running off the rails when it comes to topic relevance.

The point was that Islamic opression against groups isn't common in Britain, Indian opression against other Indians IS.

THAT is our major problem, not Muslims. Of course, Blair wanting to lick GW ballsweat made it seem like we were in this together but we have never been in this together apart from UK forces being the first to go in in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

At least we got rid of Blair, now all we need is to isolate ourselves from the US completely becuase when it comes to foreign policy.

We need to get involved more with the EU and distance ourself from the complete nutjobs out there like the US, the ME and India/Pakistan. Fight your own wars, we're tired of doing the groundwork so you can send your sissy little twats in there.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
If anyone is showing intolerance it's the Islamic nutcases running around Britain claiming it's their right to insult, intimidate and terrorize. The non-Islamic British public has seen through the charade and wants it to be severely dealt with. It is a sign of progress that the feckless British Govt. that preached multi-culturism is taking the first step towards listening to the peoples' voice.

Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies

If you have the stomach, look at the pics of how sharia law is enforced in Afghanistan in that article. Rule of law based on individual rights is the ultimate evolution of a just society. Law based on religious gobbledygook from a bygone era is just retrograde.

*sigh*

If you can't comprehend what i write i can't discuss anything with you.

Either show that you can comprehend by readin my previous post about Sharia law in the UK or just reply like this again and i'll ignore you because you will not be worth the effort of responding to.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,765
10,071
136
We need to get involved more with the EU and distance ourself from the complete nutjobs out there like the US, the ME and India/Pakistan. Fight your own wars, we're tired of doing the groundwork so you can send your sissy little twats in there.

So when it comes down to a topic regarding an extremist group in the UK you dismiss the threat and yet spare the time to go on about anyone who'd oppose them? It's ass backwards.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Headscarf, burqas, minarets, organizations, etc. When will it all stop? Will it take the deaths of millions before people realize what is going on?
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
So when it comes down to a topic regarding an extremist group in the UK you dismiss the threat and yet spare the time to go on about anyone who'd oppose them? It's ass backwards.

No, son, i respond in kind to posts that i quote.

Are you using lynx or don't you comprehend how replies to quotes are replies to those quotes and not neccessarily to the OP?

It's not a threat to anyone either, it's just one sorry arsed group of nutters, i don't really give a sheit about them nor do i care about the banning of their protests.

I've got other things on my mind.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
This group isn't banned, it's banned from protesting because of the rioting that ensues every single time. This is equal to yelling fire in a crowded theatre and has nothing to do with freedom nor rights.

No, it's not. That is not even a close relationship. Yelling fire has a base, anti-social motive. A legitimate protest itself is not an anti-social activity.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Well, i'll call you a twat at any time because if i wrote what i really think of your holier than thou uneducated ignorant POS arse i'd be banned.

Oh look you have a British accent and you're an atheist, you must be enlightened. At least I have perfect teeth.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
No, it's not. That is not even a close relationship. Yelling fire has a base, anti-social motive. A legitimate protest itself is not an anti-social activity.

Yelling fire has a base anti social motive, so does this.

If you can't get that, i feel sorry for your parents and those close to you, you must be insanity without a lockbox to be around.

I kinda enjoyed your extreme fundamentalism against Europe because it's fun to see retards waving and chanting at times but with this one...

You're on my ignore list, it's you and Avocado confetti or whatever that twat was called, you're equally retarded and none of you ever make a proper argument, you just troll.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Oh look you have a British accent and you're an atheist, you must be enlightened. At least I have perfect teeth.

Son, i have a Brixton accent and while i am an atheist i am not a militant atheist, if you keep your faith out of the discussion, all is well.

I've never had a cavity in 40+ years, in the military you are not just supposed to take care of your teeth, you are ordered to.

Exactly how fat are you though? Morbidly obese or just extremely obese?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Yelling fire has a base anti social motive, so does this.

If you can't get that, i feel sorry for your parents and those close to you, you must be insanity without a lockbox to be around.

I kinda enjoyed your extreme fundamentalism against Europe because it's fun to see retards waving and chanting at times but with this one...

You're on my ignore list, it's you and Avocado confetti or whatever that twat was called, you're equally retarded and none of you ever make a proper argument, you just troll.

A protest does not have a base anti-social motive. Just because you oppose it does not instill such behavior.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
.....

99% if not more of all honor killings or abuses in the UK are Indians trying to follow an archaic rule of caste in the UK.

Of course, they just do it to their own so you don't hear much about it in the worldwide press.

From Wikepedia

Every year in the UK, a dozen women are victims of honor killings, occurring almost exclusively to date within Asian and Middle Eastern families[21] and often cases are unresolved due to the unwillingness of family, relatives and communities to testify. A 2006 BBC poll for the Asian network in the UK found that 1 in 10 of the 500 young Asians polled said that they could condone the murder of someone who dishonored their family[22] In the UK, in December 2005, Nazir Afzal, Director, West London, of Britain's Crown Prosecution Service, stated that the United Kingdom has seen "at least a dozen honour killings" between 2004 and 2005.[23] While precise figures do not exist for the perpetrators' cultural backgrounds, Diana Nammi of the UK's Iranian and Kurdish Women's Rights Organisation is reported to have said:"about two-thirds are Muslim. Yet they can also be Hindu, Sikh and even eastern European."[24]

What a maroon! Even here, it's Muslim misogynists that stink up the neighborhood.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
The point was that Islamic opression against groups isn't common in Britain, Indian opression against other Indians IS.

THAT is our major problem, not Muslims. Of course, Blair wanting to lick GW ballsweat made it seem like we were in this together but we have never been in this together apart from UK forces being the first to go in in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

Yep, these pesky Indians should be read the riot act. Here are a few of them that strapped on bombs and blew up scores of people in the Underground on July 7, 2005:

Mohammad Sidique Khan (30) - Edgware Road Tube 8:50 a.m. Lived in Dewsbury with his wife and young child. (Hasina Patel miscarried August 2005).
Shehzad Tanweer (22) - Aldgate Tube 8:50 a.m. Lived in Leeds with his mother and father working in a fish-and-chip shop.
Germaine Lindsay (19) - Russell Square 8:50 a.m. Lived in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire with his pregnant wife.
Hasib Hussain (18) - Tavistock Square 9:47 a.m. Lived in Leeds with his brother Imran and sister-in-law Shazia.

Of course, their Muslim names are fake and were all Indians whose real names were Phailwan Singh, Ramadorai Venkatswamy, Rohit Kanweshkar & Radhakrishna Iyengar. And so to are Bakri and Choudhery (whose Indian names are even more unpronounceable). The Brits so don't get it that Islam is a religion of peace.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Yep, these pesky Indians should be read the riot act. Here are a few of them that strapped on bombs and blew up scores of people in the Underground on July 7, 2005:

Mohammad Sidique Khan (30) - Edgware Road Tube 8:50 a.m. Lived in Dewsbury with his wife and young child. (Hasina Patel miscarried August 2005).
Shehzad Tanweer (22) - Aldgate Tube 8:50 a.m. Lived in Leeds with his mother and father working in a fish-and-chip shop.
Germaine Lindsay (19) - Russell Square 8:50 a.m. Lived in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire with his pregnant wife.
Hasib Hussain (18) - Tavistock Square 9:47 a.m. Lived in Leeds with his brother Imran and sister-in-law Shazia.

Of course, their Muslim names are fake and were all Indians whose real names were Phailwan Singh, Ramadorai Venkatswamy, Rohit Kanweshkar & Radhakrishna Iyengar. And so to are Bakri and Choudhery (whose Indian names are even more unpronounceable). The Brits so don't get it that Islam is a religion of peace.

No they should just be deported, and aside from the wiki article i haven't seen one incident of an honor killing that wasn't because of caste.

Hindus are really the worst of the worst, they think they will take over the world based on their upper castes being above everyone else.

They are without a doubt our biggest problem in the UK.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
From Wikepedia

Every year in the UK, a dozen women are victims of honor killings, occurring almost exclusively to date within Asian and Middle Eastern families[21] and often cases are unresolved due to the unwillingness of family, relatives and communities to testify. A 2006 BBC poll for the Asian network in the UK found that 1 in 10 of the 500 young Asians polled said that they could condone the murder of someone who dishonored their family[22] In the UK, in December 2005, Nazir Afzal, Director, West London, of Britain's Crown Prosecution Service, stated that the United Kingdom has seen "at least a dozen honour killings" between 2004 and 2005.[23] While precise figures do not exist for the perpetrators' cultural backgrounds, Diana Nammi of the UK's Iranian and Kurdish Women's Rights Organisation is reported to have said:"about two-thirds are Muslim. Yet they can also be Hindu, Sikh and even eastern European."[24]

What a maroon! Even here, it's Muslim misogynists that stink up the neighborhood.

LOL, precise figures don't exist, every single one of them were killed because of the caste system, it doesn't matter if they are muslims or christians or fucking vikings, if they are not hindus of an equal caste they will just kill them.

Hinduism is a shameful religion, more so than any abrahamic religion because it has no forgiveness what so ever. It's a disgusting archaic religion.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Eh? It sure does. I mean this is clearly a religiously sanctioned march through Europe invovling the French and Romans in an effort to take control of the Holy Land

They were reacting against the Islamic pressures-- leader Tariq Ben Ziad in 711AD crossed Straits of Gibraltor into Spain with 7,000 Berbers and 300 Arabs; and shortly afterwords Mousa Ben Nusayer with 10,000 Arabs and 8,000 Berbers.

In other words, it wasn't till they got as far as Spain with their Jihad that the Catholic church decided to do something about it-- and started the Crusades.
 
Last edited:
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
They were reacting against the Islamic pressures-- leader Tariq Ben Ziad in 711AD crossed Straits of Gibraltor into Spain with 7,000 Berbers and 300 Arabs; and shortly afterwords Mousa Ben Nusayer with 10,000 Arabs and 8,000 Berbers.

In other words, it wasn't till they got as far as Spain with their Jihad that the Catholic church decided to do something about it-- and started the Crusades.

WHOA, you don't have the beginning of a clue, do you?

Most of the world was involved in the crusades and it wasn't a defensive measure until later on.

They were not even united at the time because Islam wasn't a united religion, but what the fuck, let's make it up as we go along... tee fucking heee.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
No they should just be deported, and aside from the wiki article i haven't seen one incident of an honor killing that wasn't because of caste.

Hindus are really the worst of the worst, they think they will take over the world based on their upper castes being above everyone else.

They are without a doubt our biggest problem in the UK.

Being that the jihadi types are all muslim and mostly pakistani, they used to get a free pass in the press until now who used to refer to them as South Asian thus lumping them with Hindus, Sikhs, Christians and others from there who have absolutely no relationship with these murderous thugs (and in fact are as much victims there because of these criminals, like in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks). It is finally changing and these whackos are being called out for who they are: muslim terrorists who seek to reduce everyone else to dhimmi status in their own countries. No amount of you trying to change the subject will alter this fact.

Statistics show that, were it not for the feckless Labor Govt., the citizenry of the UK would overwhelmingly support putting restrictions on the Nazisque attempt at a putsch by these medieval Islamicists who see democracy as nothing but a rope to hang non-muslims with.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Being that the jihadi types are all muslim and mostly pakistani, they used to get a free pass in the press until now who used to refer to them as South Asian thus lumping them with Hindus, Sikhs, Christians and others from there who have absolutely no relationship with these murderous thugs (and in fact are as much victims there because of these criminals, like in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks). It is finally changing and these whackos are being called out for who they are: muslim terrorists who seek to reduce everyone else to dhimmi status in their own countries. No amount of you trying to change the subject will alter this fact.

Statistics show that, were it not for the feckless Labor Govt., the citizenry of the UK would overwhelmingly support putting restrictions on the Nazisque attempt at a putsch by these medieval Islamicists who see democracy as nothing but a rope to hang non-muslims with.

Labour sucks arse, we went to war with I-fucking-raq because GW's ballsweat tasted so great Tony the honey couldn't resist licking it.

Anyway, as long as they are not Indians or Hindus they are probably ok to live in the UK, Hindus are just the worst of the worst, incest and acid burning along with honor killings...

Animals, the lot of them.

When it comes to who are going first, ask and Brit anywhere, the fucking Indians are going first, they are the worst of the worst, Islamics seem bland in comparison.

The caste system is a living bullsheit in the UK and we need to rid ourselves of that first, after that we can go after smaller things like the one in a million Muslim.
 
Last edited:
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
WHOA, you don't have the beginning of a clue, do you?

Most of the world was involved in the crusades and it wasn't a defensive measure until later on.

They were not even united at the time because Islam wasn't a united religion, but what the fuck, let's make it up as we go along... tee fucking heee.

What part of "Battle of Tours"/Charles Martel/125 miles from Paris"
don't you understand? This was just the start of it. Muslim persecution of Christians began to take hold, Al-Hakim (sixth Fatimid caliph in Cairo) was a great example of this. He later declared himself to be the incarnation of God. This neurotic leader destroyed the Church of the Nativity and removed the Christians' freedom of worship.
First crusades were right on the tale of his leadership (he died in 1021).

I'll leave you with a quote from the Quran-- Surah Al-Nisa 4:34
Men are in charge of women because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other... So good women are then obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then, if they obey you, seek not a way against them.

Sahih Al-Bukhari vol. 3:826-- "Mohammed asked some women, 'Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?' The women said 'yes'. He said, 'This is because of the deficiency of the woman's mind'."
also--
Mohammed said, 'I was shown the Hell-fire and that the majority of its dwellers are women' (vol. 1:28, 301; vol. 2:161, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 7:124).

There you have it, from the Quran, ACTIVE commandments that make women worth 'half a man'. What kind of religion is this?
I'll answer-- the kind that starts Holy Wars necessitating the Catholic Church defend themselves.
 
Last edited:
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Being that the jihadi types are all muslim and mostly pakistani, they used to get a free pass in the press until now who used to refer to them as South Asian thus lumping them with Hindus, Sikhs, Christians and others from there who have absolutely no relationship with these murderous thugs (and in fact are as much victims there because of these criminals, like in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks). It is finally changing and these whackos are being called out for who they are: muslim terrorists who seek to reduce everyone else to dhimmi status in their own countries. No amount of you trying to change the subject will alter this fact.

Statistics show that, were it not for the feckless Labor Govt., the citizenry of the UK would overwhelmingly support putting restrictions on the Nazisque attempt at a putsch by these medieval Islamicists who see democracy as nothing but a rope to hang non-muslims with.

Don't forget the Muslims being elected into and holding office positions in the UK...I'm glad we don't have that problem...