The best city in the world?

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Aimster
You have failed to show that I hate this country. I simply point out facts.

See thats just it. You dont point out facts. You just spew out more anti-american hate speech. Much like that of my current sig. You have to proof of it. It is just your personal opinion.

Personal opinion?

U.S gave chemical weapons to a terrorist state to kill civilians.

Has Iran done such a thing? NO.

There you have it. Now go cry a river in the corner.

Wrong. The US gave weapons to a country who ended up USING them to kill innocent civilians which was not their inteded purpose. Try again.

Hey genius

Iraq was on the list of nations supporting terrorists.

Why would the U.S give them such weapons if they were on that list?

oh..
U.S also gave Iraq crop dusting helicopters .. . right after they sold them the chemical weapons

Yeah... OK

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Corbett

The only thing you have proven is that you will say anything online to win an argument.

I doubt you will join the Airforce, you hate the country too much.

I think its just another lie by Aimster to get attention and prove a point.

:laugh:

You saying I hate the U.S too?

I think he's chuckling because Corbett won't ever join the Military, but will bang the drum of War like his life depends on it.[/quote]

The funniest part is that Aimster says the US is a terrorist country and he wants to sign up for their military!

 

[Aimster]

So I am supposed to hate this country for the actions of Republicans in power?

I think not. I'll just continue to be a strong Democrat.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Aimster
So I am supposed to hate this country for the actions of Republicans in power?

I think not. I'll just continue to be a strong Democrat.

No, you called the U.S. a terrorist and now you say you want to serve in their military.

 

[Aimster]

what is your point? You want me to go serve in the Canadian air force and fly a single engine passenger aircraft? Cause Canada is the only nation on this planet who has never done anything "terrorist" related.

If you are going to call Iran a terrorist state you better show that they have committed more terrorism than you.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Aimster
what is your point? You want me to go serve in the Canadian air force and fly a single engine passenger aircraft? Cause Canada is the only nation on this planet who has never done anything "terrorist" related.

If you are going to call Iran a terrorist state you better show that they have committed more terrorism than you.

My point is you are nothing but a sensationalist who will say anything to win an argument online.

One day you have a girlfriend, the next day you are placing a personal ad.

One day you have already served the military, now you are planning on joining the military in a few years.

You say whatever is convenient at the time to make your point, but at the same time you are tangling yourself up so much with your own words, you cant find your way out of it so you throw out some lame offtopic rant to change the subject.

I would say 99% or anything you post online come from wikipedia and google, and 1% comes from you own real life.

You call yourself a Jew when it is conveninet to do so. And then play the "My dad is Mulim" card when that is convenient.

All of your facts about Iran have been learned through your favorite liberal blog or edited wikipedia source.

YOU are the one who brings no FACTS to the table, just whatever is convenient at the time.

 

[Aimster]

What argument?

You mean the one where you are trying to say I hate America?

Go ahead argue that all you want with yourself.

Ill present all the facts you want. You don't show any. You just ramble and cry like a little baby and say .. well well.. you are anti American.

If you got a problem with the information I post then dispute it with your own facts or stfu. Otherwise my information wins

 

[Aimster]

I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

Yet you fail to prove that the USA gave Iraq these two for use with each other. Not to mention you've failed to prove that the USA gave these items to Iraq with the intention of using them on Iraqi citizens.

 

[brandonbull]

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

Crop dusting helicopters not chemical weapon dusting helicopters

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: brandonbull

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

Crop dusting helicopters not chemical weapon dusting helicopters

Use common sense.

You have got to be kidding me if you actually believe the U.S sold crop dusting helicopters to Iraq for the purpose of crop dusting

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

Yet you fail to prove that the USA gave Iraq these two for use with each other. Not to mention you've failed to prove that the USA gave these items to Iraq with the intention of using them on Iraqi citizens.

Iraq was on the list of state sponsors of terror. It was obvious what they were going to be using the weapons for.

Iraq used them on Iran during the War.
Your history is lacking. You do not know wtf u r talking about.

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

You are misinformed. No country gave Iraq chemical weapons. They were provided with materials that could be used for chemical weapons though. The biggest culprit was Germany which has a long history with chemical weapons. There's a large UN report on it. Some victims are even suing the Germans.

 

[CanOWorms]

I guess they didn't include racism in their factors because if they did, Swiss cities would not make the top 1000.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

You are misinformed. No country gave Iraq chemical weapons. They were provided with materials that could be used for chemical weapons though. The biggest culprit was Germany which has a long history with chemical weapons. There's a large UN report on it. Some victims are even suing the Germans.

You sir are mistaken.

The reason Iraq got those chemical weapons was because

Regan without talking to Congress decided to remove Iraq off the list. This authorized Iraq the ability to legally get such weapons.

Soon afterwards Iraq was added back to the list when Congress met

Reports show the U.S knew about Iraq's chemical weapons use
If the U.S didn't remove Iraq from the List, none of it would have happened

Republican President

..nothing new here

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

You are misinformed. No country gave Iraq chemical weapons. They were provided with materials that could be used for chemical weapons though. The biggest culprit was Germany which has a long history with chemical weapons. There's a large UN report on it. Some victims are even suing the Germans.

You sir are mistaken.

The reason Iraq got those chemical weapons was because

Regan without talking to Congress decided to remove Iraq off the list. This authorized Iraq the ability to legally get such weapons.

Soon afterwards Iraq was added back to the list when Congress met

Reports show the U.S knew about Iraq's chemical weapons use
If the U.S didn't remove Iraq from the List, none of it would have happened

Republican President

..nothing new here

You should let the United Nations know your top-secret information that is missing from their 12000 page report that names everyone involved, of which something like 2/3 named were German.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Its all Hilary`s fault!!

 

[Mardeth]

What does this have to do with the best cities?

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

You are misinformed. No country gave Iraq chemical weapons. They were provided with materials that could be used for chemical weapons though. The biggest culprit was Germany which has a long history with chemical weapons. There's a large UN report on it. Some victims are even suing the Germans.

You sir are mistaken.

The reason Iraq got those chemical weapons was because

Regan without talking to Congress decided to remove Iraq off the list. This authorized Iraq the ability to legally get such weapons.

Soon afterwards Iraq was added back to the list when Congress met

Reports show the U.S knew about Iraq's chemical weapons use
If the U.S didn't remove Iraq from the List, none of it would have happened

Republican President

..nothing new here

You should let the United Nations know your top-secret information that is missing from their 12000 page report that names everyone involved, of which something like 2/3 named were German.

I never said Germany didn't do it.
I simply said the U.S made it possible and did their part as well.

You cannot deny that the U.S supplied weapons to terrorist during an illegal war that was an act of terror.
Can you deny it?

What Iraq did to Iran is far worse than what Hezbollah has ever done to Israel.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Aimster

What Iraq did to Iran is far worse than what Hezbollah has ever done to Israel.

I find it highly ironic that you say the US is a terrorist because it "gave weapons to a Iraq" yet you come up with every excuse you can to explain why Iran is NOT a terrorist state for doing the same if not more to help multiple terrorist organizations kill Americans and Iraqis in Iraq.

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: Aimster
I bring no facts to the table?

I just said the U.S gave Iraq a terrorist state chemical weapons
They also gave them crop dusting helicopters.

Those are facts. Now go on dispute it with "well well we.. "

Exactly.

You are misinformed. No country gave Iraq chemical weapons. They were provided with materials that could be used for chemical weapons though. The biggest culprit was Germany which has a long history with chemical weapons. There's a large UN report on it. Some victims are even suing the Germans.

You sir are mistaken.

The reason Iraq got those chemical weapons was because

Regan without talking to Congress decided to remove Iraq off the list. This authorized Iraq the ability to legally get such weapons.

Soon afterwards Iraq was added back to the list when Congress met

Reports show the U.S knew about Iraq's chemical weapons use
If the U.S didn't remove Iraq from the List, none of it would have happened

Republican President

..nothing new here

You should let the United Nations know your top-secret information that is missing from their 12000 page report that names everyone involved, of which something like 2/3 named were German.

I never said Germany didn't do it.
I simply said the U.S made it possible and did their part as well.

You cannot deny that the U.S supplied weapons to terrorist during an illegal war that was an act of terror.
Can you deny it?

What Iraq did to Iran is far worse than what Hezbollah has ever done to Israel.

You're now arguing something completely different. I'm disagreeing with your statement about providing chemical weapons.