- Jun 14, 2004
- 871
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: her209
XBox 360 is still a weaker product in my opinion.
Originally posted by: Zero Plasma
Originally posted by: her209
XBox 360 is still a weaker product in my opinion.
I'm not arguing which is better, I don't think you can tell when there has been close to no info on the PS3. It's just that guy has been saying some stupid stuff lately; how can anyone respect statements like that?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
What an idiotic statement. Change the type of entertainment? What type of entertainment can the PS3 do that an 'all-purpose computer' cannot? Furthermore, from a developer's perspective, nobody wants massive internal architectural change to take place. Relearning how to program for a console effectively every time one comes out is a bitch and a half, not to mention the cost.According to Kutaragi, Microsoft has only improved the graphic performance and increased the output resolution with the Xbox 360 and its multiple core architecture will only "increase the machine's capabilities as an all-purpose computer, but it won't change the type of entertainment."
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
Fanboi are we?
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
Fanboi are we?
Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
Fanboi are we?
nope just posting a fact.
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
Fanboi are we?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: RaiderJ
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
that simple fact that ATI is doing the graphics does not bode well for microsoft, seeing as ati has had 1 good design in its entire history, and has been recycling that design for 3 years now (radeon 9700).
Fanboi are we?
is that why i've gone through 3 of those core variants? 9600, 9800 and x800?