The Assassination of JFK

[IndyColtsFan]

Four. separate. tapes. all. blank. I guess your last remaining unfathomable excuse is all 4 tapes were being replaced at the exact same time. That's ok, you can still use my "magic emp bomb" excuse. That holds more than whatever bullshit you or the government can come up with hahahaha.

Are you able to read? Better yet, are you able to understand what you read? Let me spell it out VERY clearly. I'll type slow so you can understand:

NO ONE (are you keeping up with me?) DISPUTES THAT THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES ON THE TAPES. (got that? good!)

WHAT IS DISPUTED (with me?) IS WHAT CAUSED THE DISCREPANCIES.

We have the lawyer: government erased them!
We have the government: we ran out of tape!

Are you still with me? Good!

Now here is the part you don't seem to understand. Slow mode typing, ENGAGED:

WHAT HARM WOULD BE DONE (still with me?) BY HAVING AN INDEPENDENT FORENSIC FIRM EXAMINE THE TAPE TO CONFIRM WHOSE STORY IS RIGHT?

Quit dodging and answer the damn question. I have not said the lawyer is wrong. I have not said the government is right. What I HAVE said is that either story should be easy to prove/debunk, so let's do it and investigate.

LuLz. Sounds like Blangdodge alright! dodge dodge dodge dodge dodge.

The only person here who is dodging is you. You can't seem to answer a simple question and continue to divert.

 

[al981]

Seriously kyle, I might disagree with your theories but I will say you seem intelligent and should be able to see that logic. I have not said a single conspiracy (the OK City bombing, 9/11, or TWA 800) is completely bunk -- what I HAVE said is that if you have good, legitimate proof, please show me so I can read it. al981 has so far refused to do it and his usual dodge (and yes, it IS a dodge) is "do your own research." He has no good sources, he knows it, and he knows if he posts what links he does have that he'll get laughed off the forum.

I've given plenty of links and facts in various threads, only to have you completely dodge ones that you can't admit are true (such as the dallas doctors on NOVA, now, this is the 3rd time i'm calling you out to admit the dallas doctors have contradicted the us government. DODGE more, loser!). Or when confronted with a blantant cover-up such as the missing OKC bombing security footage in 4 cameras at the exact same time, you'll never admit something suspicious or a cover-up is in place. Another dodge You are a shill, a loser, and a gutless pussy.

Now son, go dodge the JFK facts again. Calling you out for the 4th time loser!

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Forensic experts for at least 4 tapes that are confirmed to have missing footage? That makes zero sense whatsoever.

Thanks, you have proven my point that you have ZERO clue about forensics. A forensics expert can tell if the tape was edited (as the lawyer claims) or if another glitch caused the disruption.

The only remaining question is what should've been shown during the time periods that the government edited out, er, that is what should've been shown while the (at least) 4 tapes were being "replaced" . Also, I never quoted "government", only "forensic expert", so you can stop lying, loser

Really? Oops!

no no no...

like blanghorst, i'm just waiting for a government "forensic expert" to confirm the oklahoma city tapes have not been edited... even though it was the government who released the edited tapes... then i can go back to my fantasy world

wat?

Again, a proven liar. Twice now.

Why is it you are deadly silent on the OP's links regarding "experts" contracting the government's lies? Deadly. Silent. Tell me blangDodge, how does that crow taste?

Keep up here, we're discussing OKC.

As for the crow, I'll let you know after you get done stuffing your mouth with it, since you have now been quoted -- twice -- lying.

 

[al981]

Are you able to read? Better yet, are you able to understand what you read? Let me spell it out VERY clearly. I'll type slow so you can understand:

NO ONE (are you keeping up with me?) DISPUTES THAT THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES ON THE TAPES. (got that? good!)

WHAT IS DISPUTED (with me?) IS WHAT CAUSED THE DISCREPANCIES.

We have the lawyer: government erased them!
We have the government: we ran out of tape!

Are you still with me? Good!

Now here is the part you don't seem to understand. Slow mode typing, ENGAGED:

WHAT HARM WOULD BE DONE (still with me?) BY HAVING AN INDEPENDENT FORENSIC FIRM EXAMINE THE TAPE TO CONFIRM WHOSE STORY IS RIGHT?

Quit dodging and answer the damn question. I have not said the lawyer is wrong. I have not said the government is right. What I HAVE said is that either story should be easy to prove/debunk, so let's do it and investigate.

Uh ok... a pointless examination of confirmed missing footage... sure..

No harm can come of it. Get to it, and start writing your letters The gutless pussy still won't admit there's a cover-up in place. Gutless dodging pussy.

The only person here who is dodging is you. You can't seem to answer a simple question and continue to divert.

That's funny, coming from the gutless dodging pussy who won't address the JFK facts in this thread that destroy the government lies Quit dodging and answer the damn facts, you gutless pussy!

 

[IndyColtsFan]

I've given plenty of links and facts in various threads, only to have you completely dodge ones that you can't admit are true (such as the dallas doctors on NOVA, now, this is the 3rd time i'm calling you out to admit the dallas doctors have contradicted the us government. DODGE more, loser!). Or when confronted with a blantant cover-up such as the missing OKC bombing security footage in 4 cameras at the exact same time, you'll never admit something suspicious or a cover-up is in place. Another dodge You are a shill, a loser, and a gutless pussy.

Nice diversion. I'm not disputing the Nova doctors. Where did I say I did dispute that? Please provide a quote where I said "the Nova doctors were wrong." Oops, you can't! Sucks to be you -- wrong yet again.

About OKC -- please quote where I said "Nothing suspicious is here, move along." Oops, you can't! Sucks to be you -- wrong yet AGAIN!

Now son, go dodge the JFK facts again. Calling you out for the 4th time loser!

Please, keep calling me out on claims I never made in the first place. That will get you far!

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Uh ok... a pointless examination of confirmed missing footage... sure..

No harm can come of it.

Get to it, and start writing your letters The gutless pussy still won't admit there's a cover-up in place. Gutless dodging pussy.

Do you know how logic works? Let me explain it to you.

1. Something odd occurs (in this case, tapes with missing information).
2. Party A offers one explanation, party B offers another.
3. There is an easy way to prove which party is correct. Follow procedure.

That's called the scientific method, something you probably don't understand.

Also, please quote where I said "There is no cover up in place" with regard to OKC and the information you posted. Oops, you can't! Wrong again!

Au contraire (that means on the contrary), I have said "this is interesting -- it should be investigated."

 

[al981]

Nice diversion. I'm not disputing the Nova doctors. Where did I say I did dispute that? Please provide a quote where I said "the Nova doctors were wrong." Oops, you can't! Sucks to be you -- wrong yet again.

About OKC -- please quote where I said "Nothing suspicious is here, move along." Oops, you can't! Sucks to be you -- wrong yet AGAIN!



Please, keep calling me out on claims I never made in the first place. That will get you far!

Ah, now we're getting somewhere. The pussy dodger Blankdodge is backed into a corner, so let's have a statement from the pussy dodger, so he can't claim someone misunderstood him later on Were JFK's wounds altered like the Dallas doctors on NOVA said they were? These are experts after all. Spell it out clearly, loser.

edit: Re OKC, let's have a final statement from the pussy little dodger. Is there anything suspicious about the OKC security tapes, with at least 4 security tapes all missing footage right before the blast? Spell it out cleary you gutless pussy.

 

[al981]

Thanks, you have proven my point that you have ZERO clue about forensics. A forensics expert can tell if the tape was edited (as the lawyer claims) or if another glitch caused the disruption.

Nope, fact of the matter is, no matter the conclusion of the independent examination, the footage will still be missing, and until you see the footage, eyewitness testimonies of multiple john does and the scene of OKC before the blast will never be confirmed Perhaps that's why they're edited or conveniently ran out of tape, ya think?

Really? Oops!



Again, a proven liar. Twice now.

Nope, I never quoted you on saying "government", but i did quote "forensic expert". Try again, loser edit: I inserted government, since you seem to be a bit slow at picking that up..

Keep up here, we're discussing OKC.

As for the crow, I'll let you know after you get done stuffing your mouth with it, since you have now been quoted -- twice -- lying.

I guess you want to focus on OKC because you continue to dodge the JFK issues.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Ah, now we're getting somewhere. The pussy dodger Blankdodge is backed into a corner, so let's have a statement from the pussy dodger, so he can't claim someone misunderstood him later on Were JFK's wounds altered like the Dallas doctors on NOVA said they were? These are experts after all. Spell it out clearly, loser.

I'd be happy to read the article -- please link it for me. I have a great deal of respect for Nova and again, if their experts said something is amiss, my suspicions would be aroused.

edit: Re OKC, let's have a final statement from the pussy little dodger. Is there anything suspicious about the OKC security tapes, with at least 4 security tapes all missing footage right before the blast? Spell it out cleary you gutless pussy.

Seriously, are you mentally retarded? Can you not read? How many times do I have to spell this out -- INVESTIGATE IT!!!! Why would I want it INVESTIGATED if I didn't think something was amiss?

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Nope, fact of the matter is, no matter the conclusion of the independent examination, the footage will still be missing, and until you see the footage, eyewitness testimonies of multiple john does and the scene of OKC before the blast will never be confirmed Perhaps that's why they're edited or conveniently ran out of tape, ya think?

So in other words, no matter what happens, you're going to stick to whatever story you want. That isn't surprising. I guess I'm not going to change your mind, and you definitely won't change my mind, so why are we discussing this again?

Nope, I never quoted you on saying "government", but i did quote "forensic expert". Try again, loser edit: I inserted government, since you seem to be a bit slow at picking that up..

Uh, no, try again. Here is the synopsis of the conversation:

Me: Let's get a forensic expert to look at them.
You: Government forensic expert.... (quoted)
Me: You know you there are independent experts and don't have to use a government one?
You: I never said "government forensic expert"

You did, it was quoted, you're wrong.

 

[al981]

I'd be happy to read the article -- please link it for me. I have a great deal of respect for Nova and again, if their experts said something is amiss, my suspicions would be aroused.

How about words straight from the doctors' mouth? Go do your homework and watch the OP's 10 minute video for how the government lied about JFK's neck entrance wound. Be sure to report back what you find.

Oh look Part 2, straight from the doctors themselves: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAW-bxxZfcM&feature=related

Wait, what's that? Part 3 with another doctor saying cover-up with ANOTHER one of JFK's wounds? Maybe Blankdodge will call him a liar, and then case closed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmMXfBgjsh0#t=1m20s

Another doctor? damn i'm losing count here. blankdodge must be crying now... nah, i think he's just coming up with another dodge. (NOVA footage at the 4 minute mark, linked footage starts at 2 minutes.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzeErwgoAVM#t=2m07s

Seriously, are you mentally retarded? Can you not read? FFS, you are really this dense! How many times do I have to spell this out -- INVESTIGATE IT!!!! Why would I want it INVESTIGATED if I didn't think something was amiss?

Oh how interesting. blanghorst, after weeks and tens of hours sticking up for his bullshit lying government, finally has the guts to admit something is suspicious with at least one event. ladies and gentleman, witness the power of what real facts and evidence (but really, just backing him into a corner) does to a sheep

now , let's see if he has the guts to call all of those dallas doctors liars hahahahaha.

what do i win!

edit: damn, this is fun, time for the mods to lock this thread because the truth just owned blankdodge..

 

[al981]

So in other words, no matter what happens, you're going to stick to whatever story you want. That isn't surprising. I guess I'm not going to change your mind, and you definitely won't change my mind, so why are we discussing this again?

No, I'll let the chips fall where they may. I love open investigations. Sticking to whatever fantasy fairy tale you want is your specialty.

Uh, no, try again. Here is the synopsis of the conversation:

Me: Let's get a forensic expert to look at them.
You: Government forensic expert.... (quoted)
Me: You know you there are independent experts and don't have to use a government one?
You: I never said "government forensic expert"

You did, it was quoted, you're wrong.

you should really drop such an insignificant issue. i only quoted "forensic expert" and inserted government.

now that you're forced to listen to the dallas doctors call bullshit on the jfk cover-up, let's hear what your dodge is. hahahaha.

 

[kylebisme]

And that's fine -- where is the credible evidence supported by experts and supported by peer review?

The credibility of evidence exists independent of any appeals to authority, and mounds of impeccable evidence is widely available to anyone who cares to dig his head out of the sand and Google for it, and of course there is plenty of nonsense too, but it's ultimately up to you to properly distinguish the two. That said, one can find a paper on the experimental confirmation I referred to here.

Peer-reviewed journals, articles, etc. proved Galileo right.

Rahter, the phases of Venus observed through Galileo's telescope proved him right decades before the first peer-review process in documented history, and it took far longer than that for much society for to come to terms with his findings. In fact, the Catholic Church has yet to formally rescind their excommunication of Galileo to this very day, despite Pope John Paul II having admitted he was right nearly two decades ago.

 

[LunarRay]

I voted 'No' but actually I'm of the opinion that Oswald was not even aware of what would occur that day. He, however, soon became aware that he was being set up.

Head shot is what did in JFK. There is not argument regarding that. The number of shots fired is in doubt regardless of who does the counting.

Since that day one thing has bothered me... Just like WTC7's 'Free Fall Drop' years later... Why would Oswald wait until JFK was in line with the tree that was in Oswald's LOS to fire...? He had a clear and perfect shot prior to that last turn... IF he was of a mind to commit the crime it seems to me he'd not wait for the vehicle to be in the least favorable position to commence his activity.

I've read and reread every interview, every bit of testimony from all of the inquiry events. It simply don't add up...

It has been about 47 years now and folks say 'move on already'... hehehehehe Why? Is that not exactly what the bad guy expects you to say... assuming there is a bad guy or guys...? You move on if you wish... I'll keep the events of my life time that don't add up.... Gulf of Tonkin for instance... among many others.. so that when some folks state .. "the air is clean to breathe".. I'll quick get a gas mask... cuz our leaders have said that before in the face of absolute evidence to the contrary... You trust who you wish... I'll trust me... I believe me... I'm hard pressed to accept anything that don't add up from anyone... WMD comes to mind..

 

[LunarRay]

Would someone point me to a "... 'peer reviewed' forensic evidence locker..." :+) that contains what ought to be the most important piece of evidence in the JFK issue.... Where is his brain... that portion that is left, of course. Even Quincy would first look to the 'cone of the particulates' to determine directionality... Wouldn't you?

Edit: When one seeks to have a battle of wits with the unarmed they accomplish as much as training a rock to speak Latin...

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Rahter, the phases of Venus observed through Galileo's telescope proved him right decades before the first peer-review process in documented history, and it took far longer than that for much society for to come to terms with his findings. In fact, the Catholic Church has yet to formally rescind their excommunication of Galileo to this very day, despite Pope John Paul II having admitted he was right nearly two decades ago.

Yes, I know how Galileo was proven right long ago, but you asked me if I was "upset" Pope JP II admitted he (Galileo) was right. My reply, basically, was no, because there was a huge body of scientific evidence from various sources (from the late 1500s to today) proving Galileo is right. That was my point and has always been my point and from your post, I think you do understand where I am coming from -- that position being that I am open to reviewing evidence but I am not taking unsubstantiated claims as gospel.

Also, thanks for the link. I will read it when I have some time. Was that so hard? Why can't your cohort answer questions reasonably like that? I will disagree with you on one point though (and maybe I misunderstood what you said) -- peer review is very important and critical to establishing the credibility of a theory.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Oh how interesting. blanghorst, after weeks and tens of hours sticking up for his bullshit lying government, finally has the guts to admit something is suspicious with at least one event.

Quote where I said "The government never lies" or has never lied, please. You won't, because you can't. What I HAVE said, which is obviously beyond your meager comprehension abilities, is that any claim must be substantiated beyond a reasonable doubt using the scientific method.

ladies and gentleman, witness the power of what real facts and evidence (but really, just backing him into a corner) does to a sheep

You can't back someone into a corner when they've taken no formal position and instead, say "Let's see the evidence." In other words, liar981, you have nothing -- as usual -- and want to deflect.

now , let's see if he has the guts to call all of those dallas doctors liars hahahahaha.

what do i win!

Let's hope you win an English book and a book on fundamental logic and scientific proof, for starters.

edit: damn, this is fun, time for the mods to lock this thread because the truth just owned blankdodge..

You want the mods to lock the thread because you've been proven a liar (twice), can't see the difference between someone saying "let's run some forensics tests" (me) as opposed to "there is nothing to see here" (your fantasy version of what I said), and have been made to look like a completely illiterate fool.

But you have shown me the light in one regard. From now on, I am going to start using the liar981 method when arguing. Things will be true because I say so simply because some unsubstantiated claims are made on the Huffington post. When I'm asked for proof from now on, I'll just say "Oh, I'm not spoon feeding you, research it yourself."

 

[IndyColtsFan]

No, I'll let the chips fall where they may. I love open investigations. Sticking to whatever fantasy fairy tale you want is your specialty.

The land of fairy tales is your domain, not mine. You don't "love" open investigations at all or with respect to the OKC article you linked, you'd say "bring on the analysis" rather than saying "there MUST be a conspiracy." You're too dense to see that though.

you should really drop such an insignificant issue. i only quoted "forensic expert" and inserted government.

It proves you lied. Very clearly. Thank you for that, and I may put that in my sig to expose the pathetic little simpleton that you are.

now that you're forced to listen to the dallas doctors call bullshit on the jfk cover-up, let's hear what your dodge is. hahahaha.

I'm done discussing this with you until *YOU* quit dodging and answer the numerous questions I've posed. Until you answer those questions (with exact quotes), you are doing nothing but diverting the issue and dodging. I don't care about the JFK assassination. Seriously, it has been nearly 50 years and this has been discussed repeatedly and beaten to death. The funniest part is when you guys post a link to a survey stating something like the majority of Americans think the official story is fishy, and then turn around and call the American people "sheeple" when they don't agree with you on other conspiracies such as 9/11. You can't have it both ways -- which is it?

You made claims about OKC in this thread and that is what I jumped on, and you're throwing a hissy fit (inexplicably, I might add, because I am potentially helping your case) simply because I pointed out (correctly) that a forensics expert could easily prove that the lawyer is right or he is wrong. Of course I don't know why I bother asking, because if the forensics expert says "power outage," "tape ran out," or whatever contradicts the lawyer, you'll just say the expert is in on the conspiracy. That's how conspiracy nuts work -- they are all for "open" investigation, as long as the results of the open investigation agrees with their views. Otherwise, it is a cover up.

For every "proof" you post, I can post something contradicting it. For every post I make, you can probably dig up something that in your mind, contradicts it. There are thousands of pages relating to JFK specifically, and thousands of web pages which contradict that doctors and thousands that support them. I'm not wasting my time on a little troll who isn't even smart enough to tell the difference between when someone says "Cool, let's have some tests run to verify a story" (which is what I said regarding OKC) versus "Nothing to see here! Move along!" (which is what you insist I am saying regarding OKC but can't quote me saying it).

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Would someone point me to a "... 'peer reviewed' forensic evidence locker..." :+) that contains what ought to be the most important piece of evidence in the JFK issue.... Where is his brain... that portion that is left, of course. Even Quincy would first look to the 'cone of the particulates' to determine directionality... Wouldn't you?

Edit: When one seeks to have a battle of wits with the unarmed they accomplish as much as training a rock to speak Latin...

Too bad modern day forensics didn't exist back then. We've seen in many cases through the years that botched handling of evidence, remains, etc. have left open the door to "conspiracy!" charges.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

nm

 

[Craig234]

Would someone point me to a "... 'peer reviewed' forensic evidence locker..." :+) that contains what ought to be the most important piece of evidence in the JFK issue.... Where is his brain... that portion that is left, of course. Even Quincy would first look to the 'cone of the particulates' to determine directionality... Wouldn't you?

It is suspected that Robert Kennedy disposed of it (illegally).

 

[Craig234]

I voted 'No' but actually I'm of the opinion that Oswald was not even aware of what would occur that day. He, however, soon became aware that he was being set up.

Head shot is what did in JFK. There is not argument regarding that. The number of shots fired is in doubt regardless of who does the counting.

Since that day one thing has bothered me... Just like WTC7's 'Free Fall Drop' years later... Why would Oswald wait until JFK was in line with the tree that was in Oswald's LOS to fire...? He had a clear and perfect shot prior to that last turn... IF he was of a mind to commit the crime it seems to me he'd not wait for the vehicle to be in the least favorable position to commence his activity.

I've read and reread every interview, every bit of testimony from all of the inquiry events. It simply don't add up...

The thing is, that issue doesn't prove any version - it can be consistent with conspiracy or not, even if not equally likely.

One error in looking at these issues is to expect no surprises, unlikey things to happen. So, if the first shot was better, then he *had* to have taken it. But he didn't.

There are any number of reasons he might not have. A hesitancy because he was about to kill the President, a noise that distracted him, a cough, a problem shooting in the face.

Of course that's also consistent with 'being in position for a 2nd shooter in the railroad area', but isn't proof of that.

Remember, the guy opening the big black unbrella 'made no sense either' and some said the only thing that made sense was signalling shooters - but no, the unlikely explanation was the right one, the coincidence that someone used that very unusual method of political protest. What are the odds - a protest so rare no one I've seen has heard of it, right with the assassination?

As I said, IMO, it makes a lot more sense to ask if there were people in a 'conspiracy' outside the shooting. For example, telling Oswald to meet them for a phony 'getaway'.

It has been about 47 years now and folks say 'move on already'... hehehehehe Why? Is that not exactly what the bad guy expects you to say... assuming there is a bad guy or guys...? You move on if you wish... I'll keep the events of my life time that don't add up.... Gulf of Tonkin for instance... among many others.. so that when some folks state .. "the air is clean to breathe".. I'll quick get a gas mask... cuz our leaders have said that before in the face of absolute evidence to the contrary... You trust who you wish... I'll trust me... I believe me... I'm hard pressed to accept anything that don't add up from anyone... WMD comes to mind..

Golf of Tonkin is pretty crazy. Of course it was just a cover for starting the war - and apparently involved in the one shooting that did happen, North Vietnam shooting at our destroyer in *their waters* as it was escorting a small boat of US-trained terrorists into North Vietnam, as our destroyers often did.

I've heard the audio of an admiral asking for answers at the time from a local officer, and it was very confused - while the President was apparently assured it happened.

Isn't it funny how often this 'who fired the first shot' issue has been the trigger for wars, to the point presidents have arranged for the other side to shoot it?

Lincoln did that at Fort Sumter; for the Mexican-American war, the president ordered a group of cavalry to sit around deep in Mexico on the 'new' border, until about four members of the unit were off riding when they ran into a big group of Mexican military who confronted them as the trigger for that war. Even in WWII, there's evidence of FDR trying to get the Japanese to attack first, even if he thought it would be minor, not Pearl Harbor.

And we we have a hard time getting the other side to shoot first, there are 'false flag' operations. Operation Northwood was one such proposal to justify invading Cuba; many accounts in the 60's of peaceful protest movements found government undercover infiltration where the government operatives were the ones advocating or committing violence, creating the chance for the government to use strong force 'in response'.

Remember the trigger used for the Panama invasion - the claim a few members of the Panamanian military had beaten a US serviceman and threatened his wife. Start the war!

 

[al981]

Quote where I said "The government never lies" or has never lied, please. You won't, because you can't. What I HAVE said, which is obviously beyond your meager comprehension abilities, is that any claim must be substantiated beyond a reasonable doubt using the scientific method.

You consistently name call those who challenge any official government account, and have only recently had the guts to admit at least one conspiracy theory was suspicious (and that only happened after i trashed you and backed you into a corner haha). You claim you stand behind the scientific method, yet when scientific method is shown to be 100% true (such as all the dallas doctors destroying the official bullshit cover-up of jfk, you continue to dodge and won't dare to address the doctors, even after the OP told you to, and I challenged you. Dodge more.

You can't back someone into a corner when they've taken no formal position and instead, say "Let's see the evidence." In other words, liar981, you have nothing -- as usual -- and want to deflect.

Look at this gutless pussy play his little game. You have taken a position by name calling the OP countless times in this thread We're still waiting for you to address the links I posted about the dallas doctors destroying all government accounts of jfk's body post parkland hospital. Dodge more hypocrite

Let's hope you win an English book and a book on fundamental logic and scientific proof, for starters.

You want the mods to lock the thread because you've been proven a liar (twice), can't see the difference between someone saying "let's run some forensics tests" (me) as opposed to "there is nothing to see here" (your fantasy version of what I said), and have been made to look like a completely illiterate fool.

Nah, I don't want the mods to lock the thread, but that's their track record in the past 10+ years when facts like the dallas doctors come out that chicken shits like you can't refute I've also addressed your claims of lying, and it is clear as day I didn't put the word government in quotation marks in post #65. You are full of it and a stalling liar

But you have shown me the light in one regard. From now on, I am going to start using the liar981 method when arguing. Things will be true because I say so simply because some unsubstantiated claims are made on the Huffington post. When I'm asked for proof from now on, I'll just say "Oh, I'm not spoon feeding you, research it yourself."

All dallas doctors claims are validated and corroborated to destroy the official lie You are dodging, hypocritical chicken shit

 

[Kirby]

Nah, I don't want the mods to lock the thread, but that's their track record in the past 10+ years when facts like the dallas doctors come out that chicken shits like you can't refute

So WWYBYWB?

al981
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 227

 

[IndyColtsFan]

So WWYBYWB?

I'd ignore him if I were you. I am. Read the thread and judge for yourself -- he is a lost cause full of half-truths and lacks the ability to comprehend simple English, and has been badly embarrassed by not being able to understand basic English. He was also shown to be a liar in this very thread and is trying to worm his way out.

Seriously, I have met some nuts in life, but this guy is completely lost. You can't argue with conspiracy guys because if you have contrary proof, they will claim it was planted, the government made it up, etc. I read a big article earlier disputing the Dallas doctor claims as well (and that was only one of many that debunked the claims), which he would selectively ignore. Who do you believe? Hard telling, but I do know that after 50 years, it is probably too late for anything definitive.